JCS: Orlando Sentinel columnist Scott Maxwell 10/14/2026

Orlando Sentinel columnist Scott Maxwell talks about his most recent articles, including of the 4 Florida judges who want voters to keep them on the bench, 1 should go, along with actor RJ Mitte made helping kids in Orlando a mission.

See omnystudio.com/listener for privacy information.

Speaker 1: Good afternoon, morning, Colbert Cabrew. So yeah, owls have to

Speaker 1: be some of the coolest animals on the planet. I mean,

Speaker 1: I still remember fifth grade, they had a presentation at

Speaker 1: our school where they brought out a bunch of birds

Speaker 1: of prey, and one of them was a snow owl.

Speaker 1: I mean, damn near three feet tall, and the best

Speaker 1: part was Mr. Snowflakes, as he was called, loved to

Speaker 1: get hugs from the kids. That was so cool and

Speaker 1: so much fun. But Jimmy, speaking of owls, what's an

Speaker 1: owl's favorite band?

Speaker 2: I don't know.

Speaker 3: Well, it's The Who.

Speaker 2: Wow.

Speaker 3: You walked right into that.

Speaker 2: I expect better from you.

Speaker 3: Scott's very disappointed.

Speaker 2: Welcome back to the Jim Colbert Show. Real Radio 104.1.

Speaker 2: Four o'clock keyword is GRAND. G-R-A-N-D. Slide over to realradio.fm

Speaker 2: and send that off for your chance at a thousand bucks.

Speaker 2: I'm Jim. There's Deb.

Speaker 3: Hello.

Speaker 1: Jack.

Speaker 2: You. And Ross. I didn't get the joke. Every Wednesday

Speaker 2: around this time, we invite our good friend to drop by.

Speaker 2: He writes for the Orlando Sentinel Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Sundays.

Speaker 2: You can read his column. Guys, good and loud for

Speaker 2: Sweet Heat, Mr. Scott Maxwell.

Speaker 1: They call him Sweet Heat from his head to his feet,

Speaker 1: sizzling hot like an asphalt street, dripping.

Speaker 3: To the swag of an Orlando Sentinel beat, beat, beat.

Speaker 4: Ladies and gentlemen, columnist Scott Maxwell.

Speaker 5: There it is.

Speaker 2: Good luck for Scott Maxwell. I always forgot you demanded

Speaker 2: an intro, so we have this four and a half

Speaker 2: minute intro.

Speaker 5: I like your listeners, and I like their jokes, but

Speaker 5: I feel like a Cracker Jack prize rapper called and

Speaker 5: wants that joke back.

Speaker 3: For sure.

Speaker 2: Scott does write for The Sentinel. You can read his

Speaker 2: columns Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Sundays. He has a column in

Speaker 2: today's paper regarding choosing and voting for judges. And I

Speaker 2: think we have a couple other things as well.

Speaker 1: How you doing, buddy?

Speaker 2: How's your week been?

Speaker 3: Terrible.

Speaker 2: Why terrible? Why has your week been terrible? You do

Speaker 2: have a face of pain on today. You've got something

Speaker 2: taxing you.

Speaker 3: What's up?

Speaker 5: Our world went to stir-fried hell yesterday. You tell me

Speaker 5: if you've ever heard this before. Cindy and I are

Speaker 5: both working at the house during the day, and all

Speaker 5: of a sudden the power starts to go. Basically, our

Speaker 5: power lines to our house decided after 50 years they'd

Speaker 5: done enough.

Speaker 3: They were calling it quits.

Speaker 5: So we are sitting in the house, and the air

Speaker 5: conditioning goes down, and we're like, that don't look good.

Speaker 5: And about 10 minutes later, the fridge goes down and

Speaker 5: then the microwave and the TV. And then we get

Speaker 5: to about an hour into this thing. And the only

Speaker 5: thing we got left is lights and Internet left in

Speaker 5: our house. And we call, you know, oh, you see.

Speaker 5: And they're like, oh, yeah, you got a problem.

Speaker 3: You know what?

Speaker 5: And we're checking with all the neighbors, you know, neighbors like, hey,

Speaker 5: everybody got a power outage. And they're like, hell no,

Speaker 5: everything's cool and comfy over here. Apparently, after a while,

Speaker 5: power lines to your house just decide they're done. And

Speaker 5: when you have live in a house like I do

Speaker 5: built in the 70s, they can't find those lines anymore.

Speaker 5: So they just say, yeah.

Speaker 3: You don't have power anymore.

Speaker 5: Now, what they're going to do and bless their hearts

Speaker 5: is they just run a power temporary power line.

Speaker 3: My house looks like a hobo holiday in right now.

Speaker 5: It's like just got a giant Fred Flintstone like cord.

Speaker 5: running from the street into the side duct tape and everything.

Speaker 5: And that's what's powering our house right now.

Speaker 2: Like you're plugged into the county?

Speaker 3: Yeah, that's right.

Speaker 5: It looks like something you'd see on a Saturday morning

Speaker 5: cartoon where somebody's like, now the house is going to run.

Speaker 3: It looks like you're stealing a lot of cable. Hold on.

Speaker 2: Dude, didn't you just get struck by lightning last year?

Speaker 2: Didn't you just have to replace all your appliances and

Speaker 2: televisions just not even 18 months ago?

Speaker 5: We sure did, Jim. And we were sort of wondering,

Speaker 5: how can this happen again? Fortunately, it wasn't that. Unfortunately,

Speaker 5: this is the power company. And they will ultimately dig

Speaker 5: up our entire yard and put new power lines in it.

Speaker 3: But I just never heard of the power lines deciding

Speaker 3: they were done. Wow. That's all they do.

Speaker 2: It's so wild to have those things check out one

Speaker 2: after the other. It goes down like domino effect of

Speaker 2: just checking out completely. That's crazy.

Speaker 5: Yeah, it was very strange, and also a nice 90-degree

Speaker 5: day to not have heat for eight hours.

Speaker 3: I mean, not have power for eight hours yesterday. You

Speaker 3: know what?

Speaker 5: These are all first-world problems, but when you asked me

Speaker 5: how it was going, it was a day yesterday.

Speaker 2: It was one.

Speaker 3: One of them. Yeah.

Speaker 4: Yeah, very good.

Speaker 2: Let's get to the column. Of course, Scott does write

Speaker 2: for the Orlando Sentinel, like I said, Wednesdays, Thursdays, and Sundays.

Speaker 2: Today's column was about choosing judges, and it was interesting

Speaker 2: that I read that today because my wife has a

Speaker 2: theory on voting for judges. She says vote them out

Speaker 2: every time. Vote them out every time. They've had a run.

Speaker 2: Let's get new judges in there. Vote them out every

Speaker 2: single time. Now, of course, your column doesn't agree with that.

Speaker 2: I think there's four up for grabs, and you say

Speaker 2: that three are worth retaining and one doesn't necessarily have

Speaker 2: the best record.

Speaker 3: That's basically what I said, though.

Speaker 5: Admittedly, I don't even feel strongly about those three. I

Speaker 5: was recapping the editorial board. But one of the things

Speaker 5: I was writing about, the reasons I was writing about

Speaker 5: this is because if your wife says vote him out,

Speaker 5: I can tell you that she is in the distinct

Speaker 5: minority because there are two kinds of judges elections.

Speaker 3: There are the traditional elections that most people are familiar with.

Speaker 5: Two people, you know, Jane Doe and John Doe or

Speaker 5: John Schmoe, they run against each other and everybody decides

Speaker 5: who wants to be a judge. But after a judge

Speaker 5: gets appointed to a big court, like the Supreme Court

Speaker 5: or the Court of Appeals, Florida theoretically has a checks

Speaker 5: and balance. It's called merit retention. And voters in Florida

Speaker 5: get to decide whether these high court justices get to

Speaker 5: keep their seats. It doesn't work that way in the

Speaker 5: United States Supreme Court. But never in the history of

Speaker 5: Florida have voters ever decided to vote out a sitting

Speaker 5: judge on one of these things.

Speaker 3: Zero times in, I don't think it's been a half

Speaker 3: century or something like that.

Speaker 5: And I can't claim to be an expert on all

Speaker 5: of the appellate judges, but our editorial board studies a

Speaker 5: lot of these things. And they looked at four that

Speaker 5: are on the ballots this year and all were appointed

Speaker 5: by Republicans. And they said three of these have done

Speaker 5: fine jobs. They should go. But one Supreme Court justice

Speaker 5: named Carlos Muniz needs to go. And that is a

Speaker 5: guy who I heartily recommended does need to go. And

Speaker 5: I can say that because I watched him long before

Speaker 5: he was a Supreme Court justice. back when he was

Speaker 5: basically sort of a bag man for Pam Bondi. You

Speaker 5: may remember the Trump University scandal.

Speaker 3: Oh, yeah, yeah.

Speaker 5: When the short version of that was people felt like

Speaker 5: they got swindled. People in two states mainly complained to

Speaker 5: their state's prosecutors, people in Florida and in New York.

Speaker 3: In Florida, they complained to Pam Bondi.

Speaker 5: Donald Trump made a $ 50, 000 donation to Pam Bondi, and

Speaker 5: then Pam Bondi's office decided not to investigate.

Speaker 3: Carlos Muniz.

Speaker 5: As her deputy chief of staff and I mean, deputy

Speaker 5: attorney general and chief of staff was one of those

Speaker 5: who justified, you know, this was this was an OK

Speaker 5: thing we did. Meanwhile, up in Florida, they ran with

Speaker 5: it and they got all kinds of remuneration for remuneration

Speaker 5: for people up there who'd been scammed. So same complaints,

Speaker 5: two different states. People once got justice and the other

Speaker 5: did not. And another thing I watched him on is

Speaker 5: there was a story. This was like 15 years ago.

Speaker 5: 60 Minutes did this story on mortgage fraud and investigators

Speaker 5: in the state. You may remember back in the 2010s,

Speaker 5: people were getting booted out of their house for no

Speaker 5: good reason.

Speaker 1: Yeah, yeah.

Speaker 5: For all sorts of technicalities. And there were these two

Speaker 5: hard-nosed investigators in the attorney general's office that were doing

Speaker 5: such a good job.

Speaker 3: Standing up for taxpayers. that 60 Minutes profiled.

Speaker 5: And they were basically like, these are the only two

Speaker 5: women who are standing between people unfairly losing their homes

Speaker 5: and standing up to the mortgage industry.

Speaker 3: Well, Pam Bondi fired him.

Speaker 5: And the reason she fired him was because her chief

Speaker 5: of staff slash deputy attorney.

Speaker 3: General, Carlos Muniz, heard complaints. from the mortgage industry, the

Speaker 3: office did.

Speaker 5: And then Muniz sort of justified their ousting and they

Speaker 5: were fired. So like these two celebrated people for standing

Speaker 5: up for consumers were gotten rid of. And that's all

Speaker 5: I need to know that that's not a guy I

Speaker 5: want at the top court when companies are asking for

Speaker 5: the rights to sort of take advantage of consumers. I

Speaker 5: don't want him passing judgment. So anyway, I'm voting no

Speaker 5: on that.

Speaker 3: I do not suffer any delusions.

Speaker 5: That he will be tossed out of office because, like

Speaker 5: I say, no Supreme Court justice has ever been tossed

Speaker 5: out of office in Florida.

Speaker 3: But if they're going to ask me, I know what

Speaker 3: I think.

Speaker 2: Sure thing. That's crazy. Like I said, I read the

Speaker 2: story today, and that's just the start of it, right?

Speaker 2: There's more with this guy, is there not?

Speaker 5: Well, he's also part of the– the Ed Board also

Speaker 5: made the case that this Supreme Court has just gone

Speaker 5: off the rails and they say he's part of that.

Speaker 5: And I think you could debate some of the decisions

Speaker 5: are debatable. I think one where they're really right is

Speaker 5: the gerrymandering. You may remember DeSantis called this special session.

Speaker 5: He wanted to rush to gerrymandering. I don't think anybody,

Speaker 5: I mean, it was you. In fact, Jim, you talked,

Speaker 5: I think you may have been talking about this before

Speaker 5: anybody else put it on my radar. It was like

Speaker 5: Texas and California were like, we are going to intentionally force,

Speaker 5: you know, designed the state to benefit our party unabashedly.

Speaker 3: Well, that's not OK by the Florida Constitution.

Speaker 2: That's not Florida.

Speaker 4: Yeah.

Speaker 5: You can debate whether it's OK in life, but it's

Speaker 5: not legal in Florida because voters said we don't we

Speaker 5: don't want to allow that.

Speaker 3: Yet the Supreme Court gave a green.

Speaker 2: Light when that was initially offered up by Governor DeSantis.

Speaker 2: Didn't that get didn't that get some pushback even from

Speaker 2: Republicans in the House here in Florida as well or no?

Speaker 2: Was that green lit from the very beginning? I thought

Speaker 2: for some reason I mentioned that when they mentioned that

Speaker 2: that they they got some pushback because, of course, they've

Speaker 2: had a contentious relationship since. the entire time, not the

Speaker 2: entire time, but many years he's been in office, how

Speaker 2: has always had a little weird thing with him. But

Speaker 2: do you remember that or no?

Speaker 3: I think there was originally.

Speaker 5: But sort of the story in Tallahassee has been some

Speaker 5: pushback to sort of irritate him a little bit and

Speaker 5: then ultimately give him what he wants. Same thing with

Speaker 5: Amendment 3. They said, we're not going to do this,

Speaker 5: and then they did this.

Speaker 2: Right, yeah, yeah. Crazy. What else is out there, buddy?

Speaker 2: What you got going?

Speaker 5: Well, I also just posted something I shared. I think

Speaker 5: it was probably part of your news earlier this week.

Speaker 3: But R.J.

Speaker 5: Mitty, you may know him as the Walter White Jr.

Speaker 5: from Breaking Bad.

Speaker 4: Yeah.

Speaker 5: And it was a terribly tragic story that he passed

Speaker 5: away on Monday as a result of his family says suicide.

Speaker 3: And there's been a lot written about that.

Speaker 5: But what thing I did not think most people here

Speaker 5: know is that he was big time plugged in to

Speaker 5: United Cerebral Palsy. Like, it was his number one charity.

Speaker 5: He lived in Brownsville, Texas. Obviously, he worked in Hollywood,

Speaker 5: other places like that. But when he died on Monday, yesterday,

Speaker 5: his family came out and told millions of fans that

Speaker 5: They said, if you want to do anything to honor RJ,

Speaker 5: please make a donation to United Cerebral Palsy. And RJ,

Speaker 5: as you may know, he played a kid with cerebral

Speaker 5: palsy on Breaking Bad. He had cerebral palsy in real life.

Speaker 5: And he was just a big believer in telling kids

Speaker 5: that your disease or your disability should not define you.

Speaker 5: And he'd been coming out here every year, sometimes twice

Speaker 5: a year, just to inspire these kids and volunteer. And

Speaker 5: at this past year's big fundraiser, He and his fiance

Speaker 5: and my wife and I actually spent some time together

Speaker 5: at the same table and got to know him a

Speaker 5: little bit. And one of the things that struck both

Speaker 5: of us was that he didn't want to talk about celebrity.

Speaker 5: He's still making movies. He's still doing things like that.

Speaker 5: But he wasn't interested in talking about typical Hollywood stuff.

Speaker 5: All he wanted to talk about was helping these kids,

Speaker 5: some of whom can't lift up their own.

Speaker 3: Heads, some of whom use feeding tubes.

Speaker 5: And he was saying those kids deserve every opportunity ever.

Speaker 5: that your kids deserve and they get a hard row

Speaker 5: in life. And so I'm here to help an organization

Speaker 5: that did. So it was, it was pretty devastating to

Speaker 5: fans of his that he took his life.

Speaker 3: And that's a complicated thing.

Speaker 5: I would never presume to understand what was going on there,

Speaker 5: but I did think it was worth people. I didn't

Speaker 5: think it was worth knowing for people around here that

Speaker 5: this is a guy who committed a lot of time

Speaker 5: to helping disabled children here in Orlando.

Speaker 2: And even kind of even again, you will never understand

Speaker 2: when somebody is in the throes of that and they

Speaker 2: consider taking their own life. But I'd even read that

Speaker 2: he was doing events up until like a couple of

Speaker 2: days before this before it happened.

Speaker 3: Like he was.

Speaker 2: Doing charity events and hosting stuff like literally the day before.

Speaker 6: There's a couple of heartbreaking podcast appearances. That's one of

Speaker 6: the worst parts is that whenever something like this happens,

Speaker 6: then you look at the quick recent memory of things

Speaker 6: that he's been a part of, and there's some just

Speaker 6: really heart-wrenching interviews that are now being resurfaced, and.

Speaker 3: They're tough to watch.

Speaker 5: Yeah, and one of the ones Ross mentioned I think

Speaker 5: was I mean, I don't remember when it was recorded,

Speaker 5: but I think it aired the day before he died.

Speaker 5: And you've seen actors like Bryan Cranston, the star, say

Speaker 5: he and RJ had been making plans to have lunch

Speaker 5: last week, and it was going to come soon.

Speaker 3: And so people don't understand it.

Speaker 5: I think it can be a fool's errand to try

Speaker 5: to understand that there's something not working a lot of time.

Speaker 5: But I think the reason this one hit pretty hard

Speaker 5: is this was a guy who– just made it his life.

Speaker 5: He felt like he had so much to give. He

Speaker 5: loved to stand in front of kids and say, uh,

Speaker 5: You know, I was diagnosed at age three and people

Speaker 5: thought you're never going to do what all the other

Speaker 5: kids and grownups do. And every year he wanted to

Speaker 5: go and say, you can do this and don't let

Speaker 5: anybody else set your definition, your boundaries.

Speaker 2: So puzzling. So puzzling, Scott, because he had already accomplished

Speaker 2: so much. He'd already, you know, he kind of persevered

Speaker 2: through the idea of having this debilitating disease, had a

Speaker 2: film career, had a television career, was part of what

Speaker 2: most people consider the best TV show that's ever been made. Um,

Speaker 2: and you could never understand, like, how could somebody with that,

Speaker 2: that going, you know, have, and then be engaged up

Speaker 2: until the moment of, you know, what led to that?

Speaker 2: And you're, I agree. It is a fool's errand. No

Speaker 2: way possible to know.

Speaker 3: But yeah, uh, 34, he's eight years old. So way

Speaker 3: too young, uh, now gone.

Speaker 5: But I know that, uh, UCP, which was originally United

Speaker 5: Cerebral Palsy here in Orlando, uh, is going to get

Speaker 5: a lot of support based on his family saying, if

Speaker 5: you loved his work, if you care about the things

Speaker 5: he did, this is the organization he would.

Speaker 3: Want you to donate to. So I thought his work

Speaker 3: was worth recognizing.

Speaker 2: Well, also a little internally here, I know that tomorrow

Speaker 2: you are going to appear on the News Junkie to

Speaker 2: debate the Amendment 3 with Sean. Is that true?

Speaker 3: That's what I understood.

Speaker 5: Debate, a friendly discussion, an exchange of ideas, whatever you

Speaker 5: want to call it. I think Jack, as program director,

Speaker 5: is hoping for blood, blood seeping through the speakers coming out.

Speaker 2: No, no, no, no, no, no, no, no, no.

Speaker 4: I'm too bad at my job for that. I just

Speaker 4: want to see people get educated on what the true

Speaker 4: effects of Amendment 3 could bring for our communities.

Speaker 2: I saw a thing on Facebook today that I responded to,

Speaker 2: and it was somebody put up the salaries of some

Speaker 2: of these people who who lead counties. And one of

Speaker 2: the big complaints was like, how did you see that

Speaker 2: the person who runs a orange County public schools makes

Speaker 2: like 350 grand a year. So I did a little

Speaker 2: research going back there. And I said, well, I said, well,

Speaker 2: how much, what do you think the, or I'll just

Speaker 2: ask you guys, what do you think the budget is

Speaker 2: for orange County public schools?

Speaker 1: Yep.

Speaker 2: What do you think the budget is for Orange County

Speaker 2: Public Schools for one year?

Speaker 3: $ 1. 2 billion. That's what I was going to say.

Speaker 2: $ 1.

Speaker 3: 5 billion.

Speaker 2: Billion?

Speaker 3: I'll go $ 200 million.

Speaker 2: $ 200 million. How many people do you think the person

Speaker 2: who manages Orange County Public Schools, how many employees is that?

Speaker 3: I know the answer to that one.

Speaker 6: $ 3, 500.

Speaker 2: Okay, let me give you an idea. So how much

Speaker 2: do you think an executive makes at a company that

Speaker 2: could make maybe $ 20 or $ 30 million a year and

Speaker 2: has maybe 300 employees? You think they've got to make

Speaker 2: $ 350, 000 a year? Let me help.

Speaker 3: They do.

Speaker 2: And that much more. This person manages $ 8. 5 billion and

Speaker 2: 24,500 employees. Wow. For $ 350, 000. It's a deal.

Speaker 3: The dude probably should be making a million.

Speaker 2: Running an organization like that, like I've said a thousand

Speaker 2: times before, and like I said during that post, I

Speaker 2: find it unbelievably odd. that somebody could condemn someone's salary

Speaker 2: and have zero idea of what it takes to do

Speaker 2: that job. Zero. But yet they do it over and

Speaker 2: over trying to prove that Amendment 3 is wasteful because

Speaker 2: they pay people who run gigantic budgets, manage unmanageable situations,

Speaker 2: and they pay them salaries that they themselves don't see

Speaker 2: themselves making so they don't think anybody else should make

Speaker 2: it if they don't think the job equals it, which

Speaker 2: is amazing to me. That is an interesting psychosis to me.

Speaker 2: How you could look at somebody and go, well, that

Speaker 2: person shouldn't make that much money because I don't think

Speaker 2: the job requires that much to make it when you

Speaker 2: don't have any idea what the job requires.

Speaker 6: Unbelievable.

Speaker 2: But it's happening over and over online.

Speaker 3: Well, I think it stems from a different thing.

Speaker 6: It's from I think it comes from a place of

Speaker 6: frustration because if they feel that way with the lack

Speaker 6: of context, well, it's because they're not happy about how

Speaker 6: things are going.

Speaker 1: Right.

Speaker 2: Understood, but why take it out on somebody who's doing

Speaker 2: a job for– Couldn't agree more. Yeah, you shouldn't take

Speaker 2: it out on them. They're not doing anything wrong. They

Speaker 2: just see the number 350 and are like, well, that

Speaker 2: person doesn't deserve that. How hard could that job be?

Speaker 2: Not knowing how hard the job is at all.

Speaker 5: I got into this business to combat government waste. Like

Speaker 5: that's a lot of what we do is when there's

Speaker 5: misspending 300, I've looked at the same numbers.

Speaker 3: Jim, $ 350, 000.

Speaker 5: For managing a workforce of, it varies between 23,000 and 25,000.

Speaker 3: That seems actually low, way low.

Speaker 5: You're going to have a tough time finding a private

Speaker 5: sector company with a, who CEO oversees that many people

Speaker 5: making maybe even a third, you know, three times that much.

Speaker 5: But on top of that, Let's say you're outraged about

Speaker 5: all those salaries. Do you know what percentage of a

Speaker 5: budget executive salaries constitute?

Speaker 3: I mean, it's a fraction of a percent.

Speaker 5: If you're pissed off, let's fire every one of the

Speaker 5: top 10 people at Orange County.

Speaker 3: And guess what?

Speaker 5: You ain't done squat to change the way the budget

Speaker 5: runs because the trash has still got to get picked up.

Speaker 5: The streets have still got to get sweeped. The library's

Speaker 5: still got to be open. Everything else goes on. And

Speaker 5: the way that it works in this state is we've

Speaker 5: decided that we want to fund local government with property taxes.

Speaker 3: We don't have income tax. That's a big deal here.

Speaker 3: We do not have income tax. We've decided.

Speaker 5: And so if you want to tell a county or

Speaker 5: a city that more than half, more than half of

Speaker 5: the homeowners no longer have to pay anything whatsoever for

Speaker 5: local government taxes, Who do you think is going to

Speaker 5: pay for it?

Speaker 6: Yeah.

Speaker 3: How do you think it's going to operate?

Speaker 2: Well, like I said during my comments, Scott, it's not

Speaker 2: stopping and it's shifting it. I mean, we'll get ready

Speaker 2: to pay more for everything else because the money has

Speaker 2: to come from somewhere. They're cutting budgets like crazy and

Speaker 2: they're still finding shortfalls. So it is a math problem

Speaker 2: that doesn't math.

Speaker 5: Yeah.

Speaker 3: I'm going to get a break. I would get a

Speaker 3: break under this thing. Absolutely. I'll take it right to

Speaker 3: the bank.

Speaker 5: My kids– who are renters, are going to see their

Speaker 5: monthly costs skyrocket. I realize there are some people who

Speaker 5: are fine with that math.

Speaker 2: You're right, exactly.

Speaker 1: I'm not.

Speaker 2: Yeah, always good seeing you, Scott. Guys, good to laugh

Speaker 2: for Scott Maxwell.

Speaker 3: What do you say? Yay!

Speaker 2: What time is the Blood Fest tomorrow? What time is

Speaker 2: that happening?

Speaker 3: 2 p.m.

Speaker 2: 2 p.m., right? All right, very good. So tune in

Speaker 2: to News Junkie tomorrow at 2 o'clock. Scott Maxwell and

Speaker 2: Sean Wasson will debate Amendment 3. Always good seeing you, buddy.

Speaker 3: Like gentlemen.

Speaker 2: Yes, like gentlemen for sure. All right, 407-916-1041. Text us 77031.

Speaker 2: Back in one sec with more of the Jim Colbert Show.