Clippers Bring Back Jordan and Kobe, Still Have a Hole at the Four
Lucas, Rob, and Shap get together to talk about the new look Clippers, the haul received for Kawhi, bringing back Kobe/Jordan for reasonable deals, and how to fill the huge hole at the 4 with some hopeful upside options. Clippers feel like they have some questions before a very fun Summer League, when they can get a look at what the future may hold particularly in one Keaton Wagler.
Speaker 1: Hi, this is Ralph Lawler.
Speaker 2: Welcome to the Lab, the Jam pod JA.
Speaker 3: What's up everyone, It's the Lab, the Jam casquond come
to is always with Rob as a going rob.
Speaker 1: It is going well shop. The Sunday scaries are creeping
in like they do every Sunday, like a metronome. But
outside of that, I'm excited for Summer League. Real basketball's back.
Forget the playoffs, forget the finals. We need things that
the Clippers can actually compete in, like Summer League. So
I'm excited.
Speaker 3: I am genuinely excited for Summer League, as I am
often want to do, even when the Clippers don't have
a fun roster, and they do kind of have a
fun roster. We're also here with Lucas, someone who is
not shy about covering summer League. Lucas, you remember how
many episodes we did on Jason Preston. I still remember
that sometimes, Like, man, we talked about Jason Preston a
lot for two weeks.
Speaker 4: Well, I mean, what are we supposed to talk about it?
Speaker 2: Right? Like, sure, yeah, they're playing games.
Speaker 4: It's you know, I don't think any of us ever
thought that, like Jason Preston was, uh, you know, I
think maybe going into the second year, there are some
noise that like, oh the Clippers sink Preston might be
able to be the backupoint guard this year. I think
all of us were like, Nope, Nope, not happening, and
then it didn't happen. But no waggler or waggler. I
think comparable to, like, not in terms of the career trajectory,
but just from a Clipper Summer League fun perspective, I
think more comparable to like a shake Gilles Alexander, like
really getting the sense that you are seeing a lottery
pickpoint guard who.
Speaker 2: Could be the future of the franchise.
Speaker 4: Right, So a lot more to sort of sink our
teeth into this time, and I think, like Boba Miller
is going to be a really interesting guy to watch
in this summer League as well. So yeah, I'm looking
forward to it.
Speaker 2: And how are you, Lucas, How are you? In general?
It's been a minute since we've done.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it's been a minute. I I think I did
get a pod in after the draft, but I'm like
in between trips and just got back from the second
trip and I'm pretty sick after traveling for two weeks.
But yeah, I mean a whole ton has been happening
with the Clippers while I've been gone.
Speaker 3: Yeah, shout out to the Clippers, always keeping us on
our toes. The Clippers, I mean, Lucas, We're gonna get
your take on KWI. But since we me and Rob
lested a pod, not too much has happened now. Jordan
Miller signed a three year, fifteen million dollar deal with
the first year guaranteed. Kobe Sander's four years for eleven
point two with the first two years guaranteed. Deals that
we sort of expected getting these two guys for cheap
young guys cost control deals, great deals for rotation players.
I like Miller's deal, especially because I think Miller is
just a clear cut rotation guy. Sanders I also consider
him a rotation guy, but he also had a bit
of a hot shriek. You always get a little bit
wary when an inconsistent shooter so only shoots forty percent
from deep in a small sample size of games. But
I think he did enough overall to make you think that, oh,
this guy is a rotation steal that the Clippers got
in the second round. John Collins is a Detroit Piston
and We're still waiting to find out about Bended mactherin.
There's been some rumors swirling about Payton Watson and maybe
the Clippers looking around for a young athletic type of
player that I'm hoping that they're looking for and not
just Benedict Mathren rob I might as well start with
you before I kind of also get Lucas's takes on
Kawhi Leonard.
Speaker 2: Have you felt.
Speaker 3: Maybe with the Clippers kind of being a little quiet here,
you know, doing things we expected them to do. It's,
you know, just the beginning of July. It's a long game.
I'd never get, you know, two worked up about things
not happening before the moratoriums even over. But how are
you feeling about the Clippers now in this new era
of Clipper basketball?
Speaker 1: I mean, I'm excited to watch Keaton Woggler. I'm excited
for a new era. I think we all agreed that,
even though with some reservations about not just dumping Kawhi
Leonard and you know, to some extent or another missing
watching him play basketball for the Clippers, that the Clippers
really needed a new start. It was time to move
past the Kawhi era into something else, and I'm excited
for that. I will say, there are you know, I've
seen fans say that the Clippers will be competitive, that
they'll you know, not to underestimate them the roster right now. Again,
you said it's still quite early in free agency. That
is true. Their current roster is not a competitive roster,
and there are things that they can do to remedy
that a Peyton Watson signing would help. But their front
court is would probably be the worst in the entire
nbas I if the roster is you know, if the
seasons were to start tomorrow, I would have to look
through and maybe like one of the really tanking teams
would have a worse front court. But I think the
Clippers would probably have the worst front court in the
NBA right now. They do not rostery power forward, and
none of their centers are starting caliber, and the center
situationrobably will not be fixed in free agency. But I imagine
there will be a couple forward signings or trades in
the coming weeks to round out the roster. Even if
the Clippers aren't like really actively trying to win, it's
just not a complete roster right now. So yeah, I
would anticipate more moves. I've been happy with all the
moves they have made. I will also note Shap that
when we potted, it was immediately after the Kauhi trade
in the details of the trade were unclear, and the
picks we talked about were not the picks that were
actually the ones that were being traded, So we talked
about a package that included much more, you know, near
future picks. The Clippers got much for their outpicks, twenty
thirty one and twenty thirty three, firsts and seconds in
I think thirty and thirty three, and then I believe
a thirty or thirty two swap, I can't remember. But
the swap year.
Speaker 4: They also got the they got the swap for next year.
Speaker 1: Yes, that's what I'm thinking of. Yes, they got the
swap for next year.
Speaker 4: Is important because they're allowed to swap with Toronto after
Oklahoma City swaps with them. Yes, So whatever pick the
Clippers get, Oklahoma City is going to take it and
give the Clippers probably like twenty eight, twenty nine or thirty.
Toronto is going to be good next year, so it's
still going to be a pick in the twenties. But
the Clippers should if Oklahoma City is better than Toronto
next year, the Clippers will have a slightly higher pick
next season.
Speaker 1: Though, yes, what have the swamp is for next year?
That's yes, that's correct, which is, you know, again not amazing.
It's probably not as useful as the swamp would be
in like the twenty thirties, but it is still helpful
because the Thunder, as you said, are going to be
one of the three best teams then bea quite possibly
have the best record again, and so the Clippers will
move up a little bit in the in the late
first round, which is nice. Yeah, So, like that trade
looks even better than we thought it did when we
talked about it. When we talked about we were like,
this is the minimum possible package. Now that we know
the picks are further out, that package looks from just
palatable to being actually very good. And you combine that
with the Sanders and Miller signings, and I think it's
been quite a good offseason for the Clippers so far,
even again, if the roster is incomplete for next season.
Speaker 3: So look, it's just to get that straight. Like, let's
say the Raptors have the twenty second pick, the Clippers
have the sixteenth pick, and then Oklahoma City has like
the thirtieth pick. So do the Clippers end up with
that Raptors pick and that whole swap trio scenario there
the twenty second pick. Theoretically, if that was the case,
it's a little it's.
Speaker 4: A little more complicated than that. I'm not I'm not
sure how interesting this is for our audience. But Oklahoma City,
it has swap rights with the Clippers or Denver next year.
Oh and their swap rights with Denver are top five protected.
Obviously they can only swap with one of those two teams.
So like, there's a world where if Denver is worse
than the Clippers next year, which is not going to happen,
but you know, whatever, right things can happen. If Denver
is worse than the Clippers next year but not in
a top five draft selection, Oklahoma City will swap with Denver,
and the Clippers will either keep their pick or swap
with Toronto if the Clippers are better than Toronto. But
what is most likely going to happen shap is this,
the Clippers will be worse than Denver, so Oklahoma City
will choose to swap with the Clippers. Toronto will be
worse than Oklahoma City, so the Clippers will then swap
back with It's kind of like a white elephant head Christmas.
But yeah, so I think the Clippers like probably what
we're talking about, right, They got the future picks, and
they got brandon Ingram, They got all this stuff in
this trade, and this piece of it probably is something
like moving up from pick thirty to pick twenty four
in next year's draft.
Speaker 3: Okay, that makes sense, Lucas, I'm gonna give you a
whole next segment to talk about Kawhi Leonard. How do
you feel about what the Clippers need to do to
plug in their roster? I mean, I think all of
us are gravitating towards that four spot to me, the
center position. I think Brook Lopez is a bit of
a stop gap here to hopefully what lends it's a Yanick.
I believe it was Justin Roussou who mentioned November December
being the timeline per Yanick as far as when he
believes he's coming back. So that's the case, you know.
I do think the Clippers have a big center, a
bit of a center problem here. I think they have
a bit of faith in maybe Yanick at least getting
our runway here to start hopefully the rest of the year.
Speaker 2: And what's a bit of a transition year.
Speaker 3: The four situation here, I just I mean, to me
feels kind of brutal and feels like what they should
be working on. But how exactly could they work on that? Lucas,
I mean, I know you have a lot of the
cap scenarios mapped out.
Speaker 2: In a bit. Yeah.
Speaker 4: Well, so I'll say first of all that when they
picked up Brook Lopez's option, that was a huge indication
to me that that the center position was going to
be Lopez, Jackson and Yanick again next season. And that's
not ideal. It's a bad center rotation. But I think
when you look at like there were some rumors that
the Clippers had poked around at some other sort of
of band aid center options besides Lopez, Jock Landale got
fourteen million dollars in free agency, Nimas Kida got fourteen
million dollars a year in free agency. Like so, you know,
I had said this, I think on the pod previously,
but you come out of last season and you think, okay, well,
first and foremost, the Clippers need to upgrade the starting
center spot they traded Zoo Brook Lopez doesn't have it.
They need to figure that out. And then you look
down the list of potentially available mid level exception free
agent centers and you go, oh, maybe they need to
just bring Brook back. Maybe that's like, maybe that's just
is what it is. I think, what's the thing about
the center position?
Speaker 2: For me?
Speaker 4: With the clip is right now? Is Yonick like, when
does he get back? What does he look like? What
is his sort of development trajectory on? Because I was
not shy in March about saying that I really thought
that Yanick could have taken the starting job by the
end of the season. So what does this rehab period
look like? Is there a lot of athleticism or does
it take a longer period of time to regain all
of the athleticism. This obviously stunts his development because he
misses an offseason, he misses a training camp, important stuff
for a raw young player. So really have no clue
how this plays out for Yanick. But I think if
the Clippers are going to be sort of transitioning, I
think almost leaving a little bit of space open at
center to figure out what happens with Youanick makes sense
because I do think that Yanick could be a good
starting center in the NBA based on what we saw
from him last season. We saw flashes. We didn't see
him playing at that level consistently. We saw flashes that
were really enticing from a rookie. So yeah, I hope
that he is back early in the season, and I
hope that he ends up being the starter by the
end of the season, and that would be a really
phenomenal trajectory there. Power forward, they got to do something.
I think that Peyton Watson almost is like by default,
feels like they have to go for Peyton Watson. The
Clippers have left themselves in a position where they have
right around the cap number that you would think you
might need to deter Denver from matching for Peyton Watson.
They can get to about twenty five million. I think
thirty probably would be safer, but the Clippers could do
a couple of other things to free up a little
bit of money here and there as well, and the
order of operations is gonna matter. I think one telltale
sign is keep an eye on Jordan Miller. Right, Jordan
Miller has agreed to a new contract, but he has
not signed that new contract.
Speaker 2: Yet that new.
Speaker 4: Contract is worth over two million dollars more than his
cap hold, which is the amount that's on the books
for him for the Clippers until he signs. So once
he signs that, once he puts his name on that
piece of paper, the Clippers lose two million dollars of
cap space. As long as he does not put his
name on a piece of paper, they are keeping that
flexibility open for some options. If he officially signs, then
they don't see themselves using that room. And Dick Mathern
thing is interesting. I think there's some questions about if
the Clippers might be able to get a sign and
trade out for Mathurine and get something back in return.
The Clippers could also try.
Speaker 2: To keep mathriin.
Speaker 4: I mean they extended the qualifying offer to him, which
means that he is capable, you know of they could
still bring him back. But yeah, I think you really
look you look at guy like Trey Murphy. There's a
lot of trade smoke around. The Clippers now have gotten
a bunch of draft picks in these Kawhi Leonard and
Vitza subat Steels. Maybe they maybe they make a play
for a guy like Trey Murphy right. But the Clippers
I think undoubtedly need to land a like quality starting
forward in the next week. And we're talking about the
four position, but like the two, the three position is
is Derrek Jones Junior. I think he's probably a fine
enough fit for this team, especially if Woggler is going
to start next to Garland, because then Derrek Jones Junior
can do the point of attack defense stuff. But you know,
ultimately he's a thirty year old on a team that
is going nowhere, and he's a good thirty year old
who has a lot of value to a playoff team,
So I should he's twenty nine, he's turning thirty next season,
but he's a guy that I think really by the deadline,
should be moved in the last year of his deal,
providing value to a potential playoff team when the Clippers
are not that, I think they could get real value
back for him. So the forward positions are really wide
open for the Clippers right now, and unless they're going
to start Jordan Miller at small forward and Kobe Sanders
at power forward, they are going to have to bring
some bodies in, some real talent, and I think definitely
looking at that sort of like mid twenties range where
Darius Garland is and Watson and Murphy both fall into
that range.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's take a quick break, come right back and
maybe evaluate the Kwi Linard deal a little bit more
after this.
Speaker 2: All right, we're back. So Rob, you were correct.
Speaker 3: We were not sure about the particulars on the draft compensation,
and we thought that the trade then was just, you know,
pretty good before finding out that it was great. And
shout out Kawhi able to bring back you know that
twenty thirty one and protective person.
Speaker 1: You're going to shout out to Lawrence Frank.
Speaker 3: Shout out, I mean, shout out to Lawrence Frank. He's
he's done a pretty good job post Paul George, all
things considered, we talked about it a little bit. You know,
I've had my gripes about Lawrence Frank, particularly drafting wise.
We just spent some time talking about Yannick Kobe and
you know, Jordan Miller. Are both these nice picks that
are now on friendly deals that are going to give
the Clippers some youth, you know, Woggler, we'll see. I
also agree, you know with Lucas. I think this is
the first time since say that I was this excited
about a single prospect going into Summer League, and I
will say, you know, Shae was so obviously a real
player in Summer League, and I really hope to see
that from Woggler. I have not felt that like you
know afterwards, and Jordan Miller had a great Summer League,
but still there were questions about his shot and what
he could do, and he had a real period when
teams scattered for him and he did not feel totally
like an NBA player. But Shae, immediately, I think, particularly
because of his ability with both his hands in Summer League,
could tell right away his feel for the game was there.
And everybody keeps talking about Woggler's feel and I want
to see that in Summer League. That's something I hope
really pops. Even though I don't know if he'll have
a great Summer League, but if he has that great
feel for the game, particularly, I want to see him
create for himself a bit and particularly work pick and
roll a bit. With an athlete like Miller, I'm hoping
you can see some of that in some league. Anyways,
back to Kawhi, you know, twenty thirty three Unprotected first
twenty thirty one unprotected first A twenty thirty second, twenty
thirty three second, the first round swamp which Lucas talked
about a little bit here what a deal for Kawhi Leonard.
Speaker 1: I do like how when Lucas was discussing the Clippers
starting lineup, he did not mention Brandon Ingram. I also
would like to forget that brand is on.
Speaker 4: I'm gonna be honest, yeah, I'm I have been like
since that trade, I have been texting everyone I know
in every market, like, do you think the Clippers could
flip Ingram?
Speaker 2: Do you think the Clippers could flipping Room?
Speaker 4: And no, no, no, no was the answer I've gotten.
Some the like most optimistic that I've heard is like,
Brandon Ingram is the guy who is probably at his
best scoring empty calorie points on a bad team, and
that is what he will get to do in the
first half of the season. They might be able to
flip him at the deadline. But yeah, you're right, Rob,
I did he so Ingram probably will as the team
is currently constructed, probably would be the starting for But
I do think that those two guys that I mentioned,
and then the also Ruy Hatchie Mura and Jonathan Kaminga
are also sort of the free agent power forward two
are out there, Like the.
Speaker 1: Shiver went down my spine.
Speaker 4: Yeah, but I'm but those two, you know, Watson, and
then throw Murphy out there, because he's in a lot
of trade rumors, Like one of those four guys is
probably gonna end up on the Clippers this week. I mean,
if nothing else, the Clippers have put themselves in a
position where they're gonna end up with extra money under
the salary cap because they did not resign John Collins.
I will also say, just thrown it out there. If
the Clippers don't get any of those power forwards and
they just let John Collins walk instead of resigning him,
it's going to look pretty bad for much of next season.
I know that he is also a guy who probably
age timeline doesn't line up with his team anymore. He
may have wanted to go to a more competitive situation,
so maybe they didn't. Maybe retaining him wasn't as possible
as it seems. But yeah, I mean that I think
he's a guy that they are gonna miss if they
do not get like a Watson into that role.
Speaker 3: I'll say, man, I mean Jonathan Kaminga was a guy
not too long ago who was a real talking point
in Paul George deal's and it sounds like the Golden
State Warriors were not willing to give him up as
like the centerpiece of a Paul George deal. And you
know what, those years ago, I wanted Jonathan Kaminga. I
thought that he was a worthwhile swing. And you know what,
I still think that. I still think.
Speaker 1: Don't but but that price rob for a couple of
years for this team. I you can't have him in
Benedict Matherne if I agree? Yeah, yes, there have been
no reports about Mattherine. I would be a little surprised
if he was still on the Clippers. I like, I know,
like Jordan Miller and Kobe Sanders are not you know,
future tenth polls of this team, you know those guys
and Ingram and Woggler, like Chris Dunn is still around.
Where's the room for Matherne on this team?
Speaker 2: I I don't.
Speaker 1: I think it might be a sign and trade. Maybe
they just let him walk. Yeah, I think it's him
or Kaminga. Like if you bring in Kaminga, fine whatever.
I do not think he's good. I think there are
severe limitations to his game, but like, if nothing else,
that Key is a power forward sized player who can
play with some force and has some athleticism, can get
to the line some downhill scoring. I think him and
Mathurn on the same team would be completely redundant, even
though they're positionally a little different.
Speaker 4: So yeah, scenarios. Like to add, I guess Murphy could
be a trade, but like to to find the money
for one of those guys, presumably the Clippers will have
to renounce math Rooms qualifying offer anyway, because I when
you start like looking at at starting to get like,
you know, both at mid level exception money or below
for those guys, I think it's gonna be a little
tricky for the Kaminga and Hachi Murrit's here. I think
probably Kaminga is a guy who I would be less
excited about than Peyton Watson, but I'm also a little
hesitant on Peyton Watson and Kaminga. I think the Clippers
could probably use the cap room that they can have
this summer to make a like kind of balloon contract
for Kaminga that then has team friendly guarantee option stuff
in future years. And it's a chance to take a swing,
and I Kaminga is not. I know, he's not a
guy that you're high on. Robbie's a guy that I
am iffy on. But what I will say is the
talent is obviously there. He was a top ten pick.
He's been a double digit scorer in the NBA for
the last three years. He is still twenty three years old. Like,
if you can get that guy for basically free, for
like your extra cap room and you need someone to
play a bunch of forward minutes and you know you're
not gonna be good next year, and you can sort
of be the team that gambles on that upside. It's
not like I think if you took his name off
of his profile and just looked at everything else there
probably would be like a, yeah, that that's a reasonable
guy for the Clippers to take a chance on in
this free agency period.
Speaker 3: Brashaffa DIDs is against the NBA champions where he guarded
uh the X factor on that team.
Speaker 2: Cal Anthony Towns, I agree with.
Speaker 3: You a lot of your skepticism, rob but I think
that this is the kind of guy you live in
this transition period seeing if he can one, you know,
reach a bit of his upside, and two, if he does,
you can make him a role player on the next
iteration of a contending type team. I think that's exactly
the type of guy that Lawrence Frank will literally use
those phrases when he's talking about the presser for Jonathan
Kaminga and I get it for him more so than honestly,
maybe even more so than Mathurin.
Speaker 2: And I've the go ahead, Lucas.
Speaker 4: Raymond Green is still fregent and powerful also.
Speaker 3: Exactly, that's your upside athlete. We all why, Lucas, I'm
gonna give you the floor a little bit. How did
you feel with the Kawhi Leonard deal.
Speaker 4: Yeah, well, when you know you guys are talking about
the pick reporting when it was originally reported that the
two first round picks they gone from Toronto twenty twenty
seven and twenty twenty nine, my honest feeling was they
should not have made that trade. That they should have
just rolled it with Kawhi for another. Like, you know,
Toronto's twenty twenty seven first round pick after you've given
the Kahi Leonard is not a terribly valuable asset. The
twenty twenty nine first round pick is going to be
in range of his extension. Scotty Barnes is still young.
Like it, just it doesn't feel like you're really giving
yourself a shot at lottery picks with Toronto's twenty twenty
seven and twenty twenty nine. Twenty thirty one is far
enough away. None of us knows what the NBA is
going to look like in twenty thirty one. No, Scotty
Barnes might not be there anymore. Kawhi Leonard will probably
be retired twenty thirty three, even more so, right, I
think Scotty Barnes is going to be you know, he's
going to be in his thirties when these picks are
conveying to the Clippers, and he might be in his
thirties playing somewhere else when these picks are conveyed to
the Clippers. So yeah, immediately, the difference between the twenty
seven and twenty nine picks and the thirty one and
thirty three picks is the difference between a deal that
the Clippers should have walked away from and an absolute win,
like for the Clippers to turn Kawhi Leonard at this
stage with one year left on his contract. I've been
talking since the season ended, It's time they need to
turn that page. They needed to get value now while
they could, and they got real value. They got real
first round equity in distant years unprotected both that could.
You know, the Clippers are going to be in this
three year phase now where they still don't control their
own draft and they don't have superstars. They will try
to develop and acquire superstars during this time, but really
I think look at twenty thirty as the year when
the Clippers, you know, start to get drafts, their own
draft stuff back, and then to have that plus Toronto stuff.
If they hold on to those picks that long, really
gives you the chance to build something. But also it
gives the Clippers flexibility to start trading picks to go
get guys that they want to build the team around.
Speaker 2: Keaton Woggler.
Speaker 4: I would probably, I would prefer to be a little
patient here. I want to know who Keaton Woggler is
in the NBA before you start making big moves to
acquire talent now, because I think the Clippers are like
miles away from competitive with their current roster.
Speaker 2: And.
Speaker 4: I want to see if Keaton Woggler has a great
year next season and the Clippers like.
Speaker 2: Steal the eight seed somehow. Then we're ready to start putting.
Speaker 4: Some chips into the table and getting some talent to
put around him, and thinking, you know, who's the new
center that we need, and what complimentary wing do we
need and all of that and his garland the right
guy next to Woggler long term, and all these questions
are things that you can ask once Keaton Woggler gets
on the floor and performs at a level that warrants
building the team around him. Yeah, I really hesitant to
push chips into the table when we have no clue
who this guy is at the NBA level. Yet, I
think it's a great year for patients for the Clippers,
a great year to let Yani get healthy, see what
you have with him, Let Woggler run out his rookie year,
and see how he starts and eat. He could have
a mediocre rookie year and still end up being a
superstar player long term. He's nineteen, he's a point guard.
Speaker 2: It happens.
Speaker 4: But the Clippers don't need to be in a rush
right now. There's nowhere to rush towards. There's no way
for them to leverage the assets that they have into
contention in the short term, So sit on them, keep
accumulating them, learn about the players that you have in
the program right now, and let them develop. And then
I think probably if things start looking really good, like
let's say you gamble on a Watson or a kaminga, Well,
if Woggler looks really good and Watson or Comingo look
really good and Yon it comes back healthy and takes
the starting job, now you're starting to think, Okay, can
we go get another big piece using this draft capital
that we have to really have a solid team. But
the Clippers are still just several steps away from really
being in a position to be buyers in my opinion.
Speaker 3: Yeah, let's take a quick break, Robo and hear your
take after this. All right, we're back. Where were you
gonna say?
Speaker 2: Yes?
Speaker 1: I think it depends on how the Clippers you Darius
Garland and I think we all are maybe a tad
skeptical in terms of him being like a true franchise player,
Like he's made two All Star teams, he's never made
All NBA. He's heading into his late twenties, he's had
some injury issues. He's a smaller guard who plays a
lot based on quickness. Those guys generally do not age
super great, and I think the Tray Murphy like rumors,
I don't necessarily believe them, and I do think like
based on the current asking price by the Pelicans, which
seems to be three first round picks, I think the
Clippers would be absolutely insane to make that trade for
Trey Murphy, who's never sniffed an All Star game and
is a guy who seems like it will be a
good starter for a while but probably never a star.
And I just don't think you trade three first round
picks in today's NBA for that type of player unless
you feel like you're one piece away. The Magic did
that with Desmond bain has not worked out so far.
Desmond baind also I think, better than Trey Murphy. The
Knicks made that deal with Michael Bridges, again, also a
better player than Trey Murphy, and that did work because
they were a real playoff team and the Magic, even
though they had a pretty disappointing year, again also like
an actual playoff team with youngish All star talent. So yeah,
like I mean to me, the Trey Murphy thing, I
don't think it makes sense. I would not do that trade.
It only makes sense if the Clippers view Darius Garland
as the guy and Keaton Woggler maybe not of secondary importance,
but like will this guy develop into the guy? Will
he be a supporting piece to Garland, etc. And we
just don't know how highly the Clippers view Garland. And
to me, that's kind of the missing piece to all this,
you know, because all the reporting is that they really
like him, they view him as the guy. Again, that
could be very much just pr or spin to boost
his trade value, whatever the case may be. But something
we've talked about in our own you know, Chaps, is
how little the NBA values small guards who are not
good defensively. You know, we've seen Trey Young, who is
a better player than Darius Garland, get dumped for basically
no value. John Morant, who has had a really bad
couple of years but like at his peak, was better
than Darius Garland also get dumped for no value, maybe
negative value. Honestly decent guards, like you know, backup guards,
like a Colin Sexon. I mean, Darius Garland much better
than him, but like Colin Sexton got a two year,
you know, nineteen million dollar deal, And for me, Simons, Yeah,
two year, twelve million, and as Simon's is better than Sexton,
maybe Simon should Fire's agent. But like, like how much
trade value does Darius Garland have. I don't think that much, So,
like I think that's kind of the piece we don't know.
But to me, like, I just don't think the Trey
Murphy trade unless you can get him for like two
first round picks, and maybe not even two good first
round picks, maybe you consider it, but like I wouldn't
even trade too good first for him because I just
don't think he's that level of player. And as you said, Lucas,
I don't think this team is close to competit enough
to push in like real assets for this iteration of
the team. So I'm in full agreement. Like I'm not
really even a big Peyton Watson fan, but like, if
you sign him to a three year, like eighty million
dollar deal, chances are won't bite the Clippers that much
because chances are they're not going to be good enough
as a team for a bad contract to really weigh
them down in the next three years, and there is
a swing it upside again. Even though like I really
am not a fan of Kaminga. I would be fine
with a two or three year deal for him at
a reasonably high salary because the Clippers can afford to
take swings and they need like a forward. Really, even
though like you think he's a good fit in terms
of like actual on core because of the shooting, he's
like in his late twenties, he might even be early
thirties at this point, I don't see much a point
in signing him if it's not like a one year
maybe a two year like team friendly deal. So yeah,
like I think taking stabs on guys in their early
to mid twenties is good, giving up real value for them,
like for Tree Murphy, I don't think makes sense unless again,
the Clippers are convinced Darius Garland as the guy, and
I would be very skeptical of that, but you know,
who knows.
Speaker 3: They'd be so silly to be convinced that even just
from what we saw small sample size and how he
kind of wore down a little bit even in even
in the playing game, he was really targeted, couldn't stay
on the court because of his the fact that he
was targeted defensively over and over again. Had a good
box score, but was kind of given it all back.
Speaker 2: Defensively. I agree with.
Speaker 3: You Rob on this, Like I think if you're gonna
get Trey Murphy, like Trey Murphy and John Collins are
kind of ready made. We know who they are, late
twenties guys, last piece on a maybe contender type of team.
Speaker 4: You mean when you say late twenties, did you mean Ruby?
Speaker 2: How old is Trey?
Speaker 4: Like?
Speaker 3: I think, yeah, I mean I think I think Trey.
I think Trey has more like upside, But I do
think we know to a degree who Trey Murphy, who
trained Murphy is on like a contending team. These are
the kind of players that you add to like push
you over the edge, like as a role as a very.
Speaker 2: Good role player. Even Collins.
Speaker 3: I might be giving him a little bit too much credit,
but still, if you let a guy like Collins walk
like you might as well use that space for an
upside guy and not a guy you kind of know
who he is. Same thing with Ruby and Ruby I
think we know he's like a pretty decently high you know,
could be a high level role player on a contender
like he was with the Lakers when he was making
all his threes. And why would the Clippers invest with
that kind of money and a guy like that invest
with draft equity for a guy like Trey, I just
don't think it's aligned with the moves they've been making.
You don't want to live in that middle purgatory era
and give away draft picks to be like a play
a higher play in team.
Speaker 2: I don't know.
Speaker 3: Doesn't feel like the move to me, doesn't feel consistent
with what they could use, which I think consistently you
would for Watson or Kaminga. Honestly, those are the guys really.
To me, I don't know. I don't see much upside
left in his game. Maybe he feels like he has that,
but I see upside, and Watson I see upside and cominga.
I also see big downfalls in both of them.
Speaker 2: COMINGA.
Speaker 3: You could be giving money to this guy that was
player of the month, didn't play many games, couldn't stay healthy,
missed the playoffs. You know, Kaminga, we all, we know
all about Steve Kurr not playing him because it didn't
feel like a winning player, had a good playoff series.
But that team doesn't want to it doesn't seem eager
to keep him. There are lots of question marks on
those guys. But I think giving those guys the space
to see if they can tap into their upside is good. Really,
I don't feel like has much upside, and Trey, I
think is just going to be a lot of equity
to kind of get him. I rather would keep it
like you both have been kind of mentioning Summerlely's coming up,
Rob excited about Summer League. Who are you looking at
for Summer League? Maybe we'll have an episode before kind
of detailing a bit of Summer League guys and our
excitement for them. I'm excited. I'm close. I was close
to going to Vegas, but I'm not sure if I'm
going to. Uh yeah, I think I'll just happily watch
it at home.
Speaker 1: It's so much more expensive than you used to be.
To sound like an old person, it's Vegas in general.
And I don't even like Vegas, but like Summer League,
Vegas isn't is a fun interesting time, but like Vegas
is so much more expensive than it was like seven
years ago, pre pre pandemic, and it's so hot and miserable,
and I, yeah, I if I loved Closer, I would
justify going, But going across the country for it is
just not definitely not worth it. I mean, I think
just it's it's extremely basic. The only guy who really
truly matters to me is how Woggler looks. Like if
Baba Miller looks great, amazing, if Nick Martinelli looks great, awesome.
Cam Christie is kind of the guy who I think
I'm writing an article for. We actually don't have the
full roster yet. I'm sure that will be dropped tomorrow.
I think Cam Christi is the guy for whom it
is most important, like not for Clippers fans, but in
terms of like which player doesn't matter most for it's
Christie because his guarantee date was pushed back until after
summer league. If he looks great, the Clippers will probably
keep him as like a depth, like again shot guy.
If he does not look very good, they might just
cut him, and you know, they wouldn't eat anything for it. It
would open up a roster spot. They might cut him regardless,
but you know it could help get him a deal
with another team. So like he's a guy who like
this is his third summer league. He's you know, hasn't
played a ton in the NBA, but he's had like
NBA practices and conditioning and nutrition and all that sort
of stuff, Like he should be quite good at Summer League,
and if he's not, that will be kind of a
red flag. But yeah, wagg literally, you know, I really
just want like one great game. Like you know, in
summer League, it's a small, single size. The shops might
not fall, there might be some ugly moments. These guys
haven't practiced together much. Can he have like one game
where like it just looks like he's really running the
team and control the separation or creation pops, that playmaking pops,
whatever the case may be. Can you give me like
one game where it's like really exciting. If not, it's
still fine. It's like, you know, it's a rookie point
guard who's a teenagers. It's fine if he doesn't look amazing,
But yeah, just rooting for one game and outside of that,
like you know, everything else is kind of just gravy.
Speaker 2: With this.
Speaker 1: The roster is like really mostly full. Like I you know,
maybe they make trades, maybe they trade Dune or Jones
or whoever flip ingram and create more spots, but like
they really only have like a couple of roster spots.
So like, you know, they do have two way spots open,
assuming Nick Martinelli gets one. Maybe these you know guys
are competing for a two way spot. But like, I'm
really just watching Gualkler until a much much lesser extent,
you know, Boba Miller and Cam Christy.
Speaker 3: Yeah, Martinelli, I definitely I'm guilty of watching a bunch
of highlights of a guy who is a high scorer
who also I understand why he was drafted so late,
but it would be fun to see him kind of
do a lot of his checks in summer league. Lucas,
I mean, you've talked a little bit about summer league.
We're gonna be talking more about summer league. I am
excited for Wiggler invested in this team a bit as
far as the summer league team goes.
Speaker 2: I can, I like throw a curveball out there, please?
Would it?
Speaker 4: What would it? What would it look like to ask
Grady Dick to come to summer league? And I mean
he's a guy who got worked out of Toronto's rotation,
He's thrown in a salary filler in the Kawhi trade.
I think he's a guy who could potentially be like
a bounce back candidate. He's still only twenty two. He
was much better in the twenty four to twenty five
season than he was this past season. But also, I mean,
I think when we're talking about the Clippers, like trying
to create cap room to make an offer sheet for
a guy like Peyton Watson and Grady Dick makes seven
million dollars season if he's not going to be a
rotation guy, if he's not a guy they're interested in
long term, if he really was just the money throw in,
they could wave and stretch his salary to create like
over four million dollars in additional space to work the
angles they want to work. They could also do that
with Cam Christy has a non guaranteed deal worth almost
three million dollars. I think that they could release him
and that would allow them to create extra wiggle room
from that perspective as well. Two point three million dollars
for Cam Christy. So yeah, I almost wonder like it
doesn't feel like there's necessarily space for both Grady Dick
and Cam Christy.
Speaker 2: On this team, like very very similar. You know, a.
Speaker 4: Developmental shooter, backup guard wing type who isn't really good
enough to be in the ten man right now, maybe
they do carry both of them, But yeah, I think
that's that's something to look at for too. I don't know,
rupt do you have any I don't really have like
a great read on Grady Dick. I know he had
a better season the previous year and that he ended
up kind of on the fringes and eventually out of
Toronto's rotation.
Speaker 1: I know rappers like Raptors, people who I follow think
that there's something in there suck. That is true, and
Raptors fans are notoriously guilty about that. They do seem
to think that there's something in there like that there's
some like slashing off ball, like secondary tertiary kind of
stuff that like he could still bring. I'm a little skeptical.
I didn't particularly like him as a prospect, and he
really has been not very good in the NBA. I
think he's been just good enough and shown just enough
that like I would probably if it's between him or Christie,
I'd probably take Greedy Dick just because he's played a
lot more and like he has some more like NBA
proven skills came Christie's younger, and because he hasn't played much,
it's more of a mystery box. But yeah, I mean
if you add in those guys, I mean, I don't
think the Clippers are making big decisions based on them.
But if you have those guys on top of Miller
and Sanders and Ingram and Woggler and Garland, it's like again,
like I just don't know how Mathurn fits onto this
team unless maybe again some of these guys are flipped
or moved in other deals. But like, the Clippers are
just very very guard and small wing. Have you right now?
Grady Dick, I mean, he was a wattery pick. This
is his fourth season. I don't think he'll play in
some Like I don't think it would be crazy for
the Clippers to ask him to, but like I don't
I don't think he'll play there.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I don't think it's I don't think it's a
crazy ass Objectively speaking, I mean it feels a bit reasonable.
These players all have their egos. Grady Dick, of course,
had a good stretch of play a couple of seasons
ago in the NBA, offensively at least. But I think
it's a great question, like when thinking about the future
of this team, you know, Cam Chrissy or Grady Dick
is sort of a question here because they're so similar.
I think Cam is trying to be, you know, seen
as a point of attack guy. They've given him a
lot of point of attack reps defensively, just like his brother,
and he at least has that going for him as
being the real classic three and D type. And I
do think Cam Chrissy is going to be an NBA player.
It's just a matter if it's going to be here
or for another team, if he needs another year to
find it. You know, Grady Dick, I don't know, you know,
I definitely watched him a bit a few years ago
when he was the runner type that seemed like it
just seemed like that would have a role. And he's
a bigger body than I realized when we when we
brought him in, and feels like he would be a
guy that positionally defensively you could at least get away
with because he's a bigger body, and you know, he's
a kind of motion guy that if TYLERU is really
talking about pace and kind of moving, that sort of
runner would be important for an offense that way too,
And you would imagine he would create a lot of
that Paul George, you know, tertiary stuff that we saw
the Clippers running with George back when, and just having
a guy capable of doing that on the NBA level,
just feel it was like a lot of things that
would make sense. But of course he was out of
the rotation last year. He wasn't in the playoff rotation
last year. Does he just need a season to get
it back. We'll see. I think this is a huge
year for him, and I think the Clippers will see
what he's got left in those cobwebs, if he's a
guy that he could really plan for in the coming
years or not.
Speaker 2: Yeah, it's really interesting to me, But yeah.
Speaker 4: I think they're I mean, the reason I asked about
about Dick in Summer League is because I'm like, looking
at the roster, I'm looking at the cap sheit. I'm
kind of looking at him as I'm wondering, is he
a cut candidate? And I think there is some like
you know, he's he's twenty two, and there's obviously some
upside there. I'm not saying that they should cut him,
but I think when you when you look at the
roster from a neutral lens and you look at that
contract and you look at them trying to create cap
room to go after a guy like Watson. You know,
do you want to miss out on Peyton Watson because
you're paying Grady Dick seven million dollars to be a
third stringer next year? Are you planning on playing him
next year? Does he going to have an opportunity to
compete for minutes? I think are you bringing Benedict Matherin
back is a huge question as a part of that
equation for Dick as well. So but of course in
a scenario where you got Watson, you wouldn't be bringing
mather In back, so then maybe Dick would be the
backup shooting guard. But regardless, you know, I think there's
a lot in the mix there. I don't think we
will see him a summer weeks, So sorry if that
gave anyone a false hope, But yeah, there's I just
wanted to talk about him for a little bit because
I think he's an interesting piece of this trying to
figure out like is he is he viewed as an
asset that the team wants to take an upside swing
on or was he just salary filler? Do they think
he's in the rotation next year?
Speaker 2: I'm I would like to.
Speaker 4: Sort of be a fly on the wall on some
Grady Dick conversations in the Clippers front office and try
to understand where what they're thinking with that young player
that they've acquired.
Speaker 3: Yeah, any any closing thoughts, Rob before we wrap this
one up.
Speaker 1: Yeah, in terms of just pure roster crunch, I know
Lucas mentioned trading Derek Jhonesior. I would honestly see and
I like Derek Jones Junior. He's been a good Clipper,
he's a good player. He's wasted on this team, and
maybe the Clippers are doing this. I would try to
see if you could trade him this summer. Maybe you
get more fro him at the deadline when a you know,
contending team you know, maybe not Panics but really needs
like that last piece or just needs an upgrade on
the wing or something, and you're able to get more.
But like, I think he could probably get some decent
stuff for him now. And like again, if you're talking
about a roster crunch, like he's the guy who again
is a good NBA player, is a good you know,
rotation spot on like a contending team. The Clippers are
not close to that, and like he's much It's extremely
unlikely Cam Christio Grady Dick will ever be as good
as Derek Jones. Honestly, it's unlikely Benedict Mathern will be
as good as Derek Jones. But like for this particular roster,
like I'd want as many upside bets as possible kind
of stored. And like again, if you're talking just purely
like roster fit, like they're a little bit different, especially
on offense, but like Chris Dunn is cheaper and has
less value to other teams, and like, if you just
need a point of attack defender to play twenty five minutes,
like I think you can kind of just use Chris
Dunn there. So I would be trying to trade Derek Jones.
And I do wonder again if you flip them just
to a team with space that opens up more space,
maybe you bring a forward back from a team that's
as a little bit you know, you know, just fix
each other's roster imbalance issues. So yeah, that's something I
will keep an eye on, in addition to maybe some
of the free agents, because I do think he doesn't
really make sense on this roster, and that would ease
the roster crunch a little.
Speaker 3: Bit, and he's definitely their most desirable asset right now,
I would.
Speaker 1: Say, outside of Walkler obviously, who they're not traded.
Speaker 4: H yeah, yeah, he's Derek John Junior is a guy
again has been a good Clipper. I really like him
since the season ended, very clearly a guy that they
should be moving on for a guy who has real
value to a playoff team rotation. I thought that they
could potentially get like a late first in this year's
draft for him. I was really hoping to see a
draft day trade of Derek Jones Junior. Not that I
like want him gone right, but I think everyone hopefully
understands the gist here of he's like in his prime,
ready to be a great role player on a good
playoff team and the Clippers are going to be wallowing
a little lower down for a while, and maybe he
can be the adult in the room and help the
defense out Right now, he certainly seems to be like
you know, Rob corrected me earlier that him and Ingram
would be the starting forwards, but like god, Darius Garland
and then either Chris Dunn or Woggler and then Jones,
Ingram Brook Lopez, Like I don't know if that team
wins thirty games. So I think the Clippers are in
a position where like, if you get a Peyton Watson,
then you absolutely move on from a Derek Jones junior,
especially if you can get value for him. And I
think that probably is what that would be the type
of move I would think that would push the Clippers
maybe back towards like if they have some good you know,
woggler as good as a rookie, and you know, they
don't lose one of their key players for the whole
season and things like that, maybe they could start scrapping
towards that five hundred mark and that play in tournament.
Speaker 2: Again.
Speaker 4: I also will say, just very quickly because of the
new tanking incentivization structure, where teams outside of the play
in tournament, like the team that finishes, you know with
like the ninth worst record in the league will have
as like tied for the best lottery odds. I do
think we will see a lot of teams that own
their own first round picks, you know, politely ducking out
of the play in tournament because they would rather have
the lottery odds from being seventh or eighth or ninth
worst than being stuck in the play in tournament. So
I think that may may have actually made the road
to the play in tournament a little easier for the
Clippers this lottery reform. But they still have to be
competitive and win enough games to be in the conversation
when you get to February. And I think even a
guy like Hatchi Mura, who I don't like particularly as
a player, and I don't think is long term fit
for this team, he could be a guy who adds
a few wins to your regular season compared to the
other rotation options that you have, maybe gets you into
the play and tournament. Maybe means you're sending a worst
pick to Oklahoma Siddy, you know the Clippers. That's the
spot the Clippers are in right now.
Speaker 3: Yeah, I'm excited to see what they do with it.
I'm just excited that the Clippers are finally moved on
from this era, have some future to look forward to.
It's probably going to be a lean year or two,
but I hope that they are able to acquire some
more upside to make it something worth looking forward to.
And they could be scrappy, you know, maybe they could
have a scrappy Shaye type of year next year. I
think that's the upside hope with this team. Enough that
a superstar looks at their team and is angry and
thinks twice about maybe coming to a sunny state and
hanging out with the Clippers. That'll do it for this
episode of the Objttion on the podcast, leave us a
nice five star review. Whatever platformance is on, five stars
five stars really helps. Some nice words too, We'll read
them on the air, and as always, go Clippers.