Purgatory
Lucas Hann and Robert Flom discuss the Clippers remaining in Kawhi Leonard purgatory, as well as some minor roster additions.
Speaker 1: What's up? Everyone?
Speaker 2: Welcome back to another episode the Lob Jam the Podcast.
I'm luc San joined today as always big Shot Bob himself,
Robert Flahm.
Speaker 1: How's it going, Rob?
Speaker 3: You know, Lucas, things are actually good. We're recording on
a Saturday afternoon instead of our Sunday afternoon, and because
of that, my mood is much better, because Saturdays are great,
and usually Sunday by this time, as everybody knows, I
head towards the Sunday scaries.
Speaker 4: But right now life is chill so nice.
Speaker 1: Well, I'm glad you wore that.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Saturday August first here on the lobby GM of
the podcast, and just here we will wrap up some
stuff that has been going on around the Clippers in
recent days and weeks. Of course, I don't know how
much new there is to cover on the Quid Leonard front,
but we'll spend a little time there. We'll talk about
a small trade the Clippers made and look ahead at
what could be left on the margins for them this offseason. Rob,
you want to kick us off with some Kawhi Leonard
talk and to let us know, you know, are the
Clippers gonna get in trouble?
Speaker 1: What do you think.
Speaker 4: Yeah, so we haven't.
Speaker 3: We've kind of danced around this because none of us
really wants to talk about it for a variety of reasons.
As we've mentioned throughout this entire Sokka it's not really
basketball related and that's what we actually care about, and
that's what's interesting for us to talk about. And also
like the investigation is just gonna happen, and so there's
really not a ton of point in speculating on stuff
when like we just don't know.
Speaker 2: That.
Speaker 3: Being said, I will speculate for a little bit. There's
been like a very very slight drip in content about
the Kawhi Leonard thing for the past couple of weeks.
And I'm sure most people who are listening to this podcast,
who are very big Clippers fans, pay attention to that
sort of stuff and are pretty up to date. But
Baxter Holmes of ESPN, who's one of the few I
would say, like investigative sports journalists we have left outside
of the notorious pablotry, of course, did publish an article,
I believe this past week where he mentioned the investigation
or the results or the follow up from the investigation
could carry into twenty seven, if the Clippers and or
the Players Association decide to fight any of the punishments
that are levied against them by the NBA and whatever
arbiter they go to, and then there's been some other stuff.
Some raptors, people who are somewhat connected, have noted that
they think the trade will go through, but that they
their hunt or what they want, and it's they're coming
obviously from a raptor's perspective, is that if the Clippers
would take back a little bit less assets, you know,
maybe one fewer swamp and one fewer second or whatever,
maybe at first, whatever it is, the raptors would just
go ahead and pull the trigger on the trade, and
at least from a Clippers perspective, a lot of the
kind of be over with Becausekawhi would efficially be off
the team, et cetera. I think there are really a
few different options as to what happens. The most raadforward
is that the trade goes through exactly as is, because
the charges like there are not many punishments levied against
the Clippers or such as they are, that they're not
directly related to Qui's contract and therefore have nothing to
do with the trade, there is a possibility that there
might be some sort of suspension, and therefore the Clippers
have to you know, lighten the you know, whatever offer
they the trade, they agreed upon trade. So maybe it's
like one fewer first or a swap or seconds, depending
on how big the suspension is. Three Kauhi's contract gets
voided or he has a season long suspension or something
like that, and the whole trade is is probably called off.
And four the Raptors get cold feet, and this this
drags on. I guess this would be the prerequisite. Is
this drags on and on and on, and it'smer and
we don't know yet and they're still mulling things over
whatever on earth they're doing with this, and the Raptors
get cold feet and decide, you know what, we're not
going to do. This training camp is coming up. We're
gonna prep with the guys we have on the roster.
Brandon ingram Grady Dick, Welcome back, Kawhi, Leonard, you're back
in LA. I did think it was also notable Ramona
Shelbourne went on TV at some point this week. Who's
pretty plugged into the Clippers. I would say Lucas I
mean maybe not like the most plugged in, but pretty
plugged in, and said that if the trade was canceled
or like the Raptors called it off, whatever, the Clippers
would welcome back why and kind of left open that
unsaid that Kawhi would probably be okay with coming back
for a year, which I also thought was notable because
that was kind of an indication that maybe that might
be on the table one way or another. And that's
kind of where we stand. I can speculate a little
bit on like what I think is most likely and
just give some overall thoughts on this complete disaster and
farce that this has been. But I didn't know if
you wanted to chime in, because I've been talking for
five minutes.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think I don't know.
Speaker 2: I the thing that I just come back to with this,
and it's not necessarily like super productive, but it just
is so embarrassing for the NBA two like to launch
this huge investigation into one of its teams because of
allegations that are made on a podcast.
Speaker 1: And I'm not.
Speaker 2: Saying that like because something happens on a podcast that
it's not legitimate or whatever, right, but fine, they're gonna
they're gonna investigate this thing. It's embarrassing. First of all,
if there is something here, it's embarrassing to the NBA
in the first place that they had to find out
about it from Pablo Torre. And that's not a slight
against Pablo and his you know, investigation, but the NBA
should have a handle on their own business, and so
it is I think inherently and uncontroversially embarrassing when your
organization or your league is scandalized and you don't know
what's going going on in your own league, I think.
Speaker 1: That's a bad sign.
Speaker 2: Uh.
Speaker 1: I also think it's a bad sign.
Speaker 2: I think it's embarrassing for the NBA that they've been
doing this for a year now and they still can't
figure out if something happened or not, or what punishment
there should or shouldn't be.
Speaker 3: I mean that it's been eleven months. We're at eleven
months now.
Speaker 2: They have unfettered access to everything that they want. The
Clippers are a franchise of the NBA. They have to
participate in interviews. They can be punished for not participating
in the investigation. So there's no there's none of the
like pulling teeth here. That should be happening. And the
Clippers have said all along that they're cooperating fully, and
we haven't heard any report or allegation or sanctions taken
against them for not cooperating fully.
Speaker 1: So what has taken eleven months to find out?
Speaker 2: Right? And you know, you see some of these reports
about you know, staff and other teams are confused because
the investigation has been going on for months and some
Clippers staff still haven't been interviewed, and blah blah blah. Right,
and like all these reports coming in these different times,
we don't know what's going on. And then Adam Silver
has absolutely no accountability for any of it. He just
abdicates the whole process and says, we hired it out.
Speaker 1: It's not my problem. So you have a commissioner who's.
Speaker 2: Like a sleep at the wheel in so far as
misconduct could be occurring that he's not aware of and
is finding out.
Speaker 1: Through the news.
Speaker 2: He's asleep at the wheel in so far as the
league isn't going to do its own disciplinary process for
one of its teams. He's a sleep at the wheel
in so far as he has no or claims ignorance
and no oversight to the external process that is dragged
on for over a year now, and I just want
to say, you know, this is what I talked about
the last time we talked about quiring the pod too.
Maybe the Clippers cheated. Maybe they did something they shouldn't
have done. They funneled money in a direction that was
wrong to funnel. Maybe it's not against the rules, but
they probably shouldn't have done it. Maybe it is against
the rules and they're going to get punished. Maybe they
broke laws. I don't know the answer to these questions.
But what I will say is, at this point, right now,
August first, twenty twenty six, the Clippers are being punished
for something that they have not been found to have done,
because not allowing them to complete this Kawhi Leonard trade
is a punishment. He's a thirty five year old All
NBA player All NBA last season, not like All NBA
six years ago. He was an All NBA player last season.
He's thirty five. The Clippers are a lottery team. He
has one year left on his contract. Any logic dictates
that the Clippers need to trade him for whatever return
they can get so that they can turn the page.
Any team that is in the lottery with an all
NBA guy in their mid thirties on an expiring deal
is going to be looking to do this. The Clippers
are doing the most rational self preservation move.
Speaker 1: That an organization in their situation can do.
Speaker 2: They're not allowed to do it despite the NBA not
having found that they did anything wrong yet. And if
the NBA comes.
Speaker 1: Out tomorrow or tomorrow's a Sunday, so it won't be tomorrow.
Speaker 2: But if the NBA comes out next week or at
some point in August, even with this huge portfolio of
findings against the Clippers, and they're like, yeah, we've known
for months that we were going to drop the hammer
on them, but we needed to dot our eyes and
cross our te's.
Speaker 1: Okay, fine, but why all this?
Speaker 2: Why no transparency, why no accountability, why all the secrecy whatever?
But if they come out with something that is a
little half asked or circumstantial and try to do some
halfway punishments, I mean, let me ask you, like, do
you think the Clippers would let do you think the
NBA would let the Clippers sign Kwhin Leonard to an extension?
Speaker 1: Right now? Probably not couldagine how that would look.
Speaker 4: Yeah, it would be bad.
Speaker 3: I mean, I think that's where we're at, right I
think you described at the very end, so this is
a good segue into me talking about this and then
hopefully we can move on to other things. But like again,
based on like what you alluded to, if there was
really a obvious evidence about this, this thing would be
over right. Like you can say all you want, like
the league needs to write up an official dossier and
as you said, like to square things way before levying
all these punishments. If they had hard proof of the
Clippers doing this stuff, this investigation would not be taking
this long ipso facto.
Speaker 4: They don't.
Speaker 3: And maybe they found a little bit more than publatory.
Maybe they found some stuff that answers all of the
things publatory brought up. So I think we're at right
now is that the NBA. There have been some reports
that the investigation, such it is as it is by
the law firm, has concluded, or it is basically concluded,
And it's like in the discussion phase, which might have
to do with the law firm, might be entirely internal
to the NBA.
Speaker 4: Who knows.
Speaker 3: And I think where we're at is that the Court
of Public opinion, which does matter to the league in
terms of reputation and just pr however you want to
phrase it, has decided against the Clippers and Kawhi Leonard
because of pabulatory and for whatever other reason. Like by
and large, when you talk with non Clippers fans, they
think the Clippers did this and that, you know, some
punishment should be levied against them, and arguing with them
is just that you just cannot convince them that the
court of public opinion has been pretty firmly decided.
Speaker 4: And I think the.
Speaker 3: NBA, you know, does not think that they can just
let the Clippers off without any punishment, even if there's
no hard evidence. And I'm not even sure that that's
a bad thing, Like I think they could be like,
we don't have any hard evidence, but there's a lot
of circumstantial stuff, and you know, we think something fishy
went on here, and therefore we're going to try to
make some sort of punishments. And I think where they're
at is trying to figure out what those punishments are
and what happens if the Clippers, who as you said,
have maintained innocence this entire time, are like, even if
we're getting out of this with only like a fine
and maybe you know, Balmer can't appear at games for
half a year or whatever. It ends up being kind
of a stop on the wrist. Maybe the Clippers are like,
we are completely innocent. You guys didn't find anything. This
is not acceptable. We're fighting this, and then it becomes
a further embarrassment. So I think right now, and again
this purely speculation, with zero inside sources of this at all,
is that we're somewhere in that ballpark where the investigation
has not found anything concrete. The NBA, because of public
pressure and maybe because of some internal pressure from other
teams and owners or whatever, wants to levy some kind
of punishment, but they are worried about how it will
play with the Clippers and Steve Baumer, who's the most powerful,
single or richest owner in the league, and what he
might do to fight this, and kind of the spiraling
effect of that. And I think that's where we're at
right now. Again, I don't know, and it's just a
mess like the NBA, Like ultimately Adam Silver, as you said,
has been ineffectual, Like he can make a decision regardless,
and that's what people have said all along. It's like
when I've argued with them about like Pubulatory's thing is
just not conclusive, Like you might be decided by it,
but it is simply not conclusive. Of aps are convention.
You might think that, but it's not. And therefore, like
the NBA, just levying this huge punishment would set a
precedent and could look really bad if there's no hard evidence.
But like they it's just it's it's a rock and
a hard place, I think. But like Adam Silver could
make a decision. He could be you know what, we
think the Clippers did it. There's no hard evidence, it
doesn't matter. We're going to do it and risk an
awe war with Steve Walmer.
Speaker 4: Or he could go complete the other.
Speaker 3: Way and say, like there was a lot of circumstantial stuff,
we did not find any hard evidence. We're letting this
go without anything. But they're afraate of afraid of the
blowback there and as you said, are settling for kind
of like a half assed thing. And I think that's
why this is taking so long, because that's even though
it's the less the worst, it's the best for them
in terms of pr but it's the one that's kind
of the hardest you know, needle to thread and the
one with kind of the most logical room.
Speaker 4: And I think that's where we're at.
Speaker 3: And I would expect some kind of punishment, but I
would not expect avoided contractor the hammer to fall again.
If they had hard evidence, this would be over.
Speaker 2: Yeah, And I think Rob but even what you're describing
as another embarrassment, right, like, yeah, we like I understand
the NBA's beholden to public opinion to an extent. But
part of the reason why this is the thing that
it is is because the NBA, this has been asleep
at the wheel for the last eleven months and so
this narrative has has run wild in the media without
any type of counter or without any official word. It's
all of this speculation and all of these allegations, and
the NBA goes in external firms investigating.
Speaker 1: We don't know. So they've made their own bed a
little bit.
Speaker 2: And you know, I'm not a I'm not gonna cry
for justice for Steve Balmer, Like Steve Balmer will be fine.
But when we talk about the way that this trade
will be affected by this, Right, on the one hand,
if Kawhi Leonard as an individual player is punished, like
something is done to his contract, or he is suspended
for a certain amount of games, like if Kwhi Leonard
is suspended for twenty five games to start next season,
Toronto may want to revisit the compensation in that deal, right,
But also what you talked about is when the NBA
makes a decision on a punishment here, they can't just
unilaterally implement that punishment. The way that the collective bargaining
agreement works, it has to go through arbitration, and so
that process is going to take a while, Like going
through arbitration is going to be another lengthy legal step
of this process. You alluded to this idea of a settlement,
like they could avoid arbitration if they settle. Well, if
the NBA finds no wrongdoing, there's no need for a settlement,
there's no need for arbitration.
Speaker 1: But if the NBA comes with some type of.
Speaker 2: Half measure, not a hammer, but some type of punishment,
do the Clippers accept that punishment in exchange for being
able to get this trade done? And my stance is,
and I said this in the discord this week, if
it doesn't affect basketball, the Clippers should take the settlement.
Speaker 4: Yes, I fully agree.
Speaker 2: If it's like Steve Ballmer can't sit and in his
seats this year, and Lawrence Frank is suspended from basketball
operations for a year and there's a five hundred thousand
dollars fine or whatever, they should just take the settlement
because the opportunity cost of going to arbitration and not
getting this package back for Kawhi Leonard is more harmful
to the long term future of the franchise than these
types of short term non basketball sanctions.
Speaker 1: Again, though it.
Speaker 2: Puts I think it's I think anyone who's concerned, like
anyone who cares about things like do process right, should
be really concerned that the league is in a position
where they can put a team through a year long investigation,
not come out and say that they found anything, and
then say, well, you have to accept this punishment even
though we didn't find anything, because fighting it is going
to cost you too much. I mean, this is how
the legal system works for normal people all the time, right,
and it's a problem. So it's again, I'm not here
to like to cry for justice for Steve Balmer, but
I think you really, like anyone who understands how these
types of processes work. Anyone who has experience with due process,
with disciplinary and legal proceedings can tell you that this
has been a disaster. It's just been so poorly managed
by Adam Silver. From the frankly, like the Clippers could
have broken all the rules, they could be found to
have broken all the rules and the hammer could be
dropped on them.
Speaker 1: And if it took Adam Silver this.
Speaker 2: Long through this process to drop that hammer and find
out that those rule violations had occurred, that like the
NBA should look for a new commissioner, because there's no
way that it should take this long to do that
if that is indeed what occurred. So, you know, whatever happens,
I just think it's this whole thing has been a
huge black mark on the NBA. I think that Adam Silver,
especially in the last two years or so, has really
lost the plot. You know, you see these lines about
first of all, all the tanking stuff that I know.
Speaker 1: We've talked about on a pod before, rob but also.
Speaker 2: Like fans access games through highlights on social media, and
we don't need to make full games accessible to watch
live for fans and all these things right, like just
completely anti basketball and anti sport, the gambling stuff that's
happening in the game right now. I mean the NBA
is you know, the NBA is not financially unhealthy. The
NBA is financially extremely healthy. But it is so that
the financial health of the league is so unchecked that
the corruption and integrity of the league are in you know,
pretty bad places right now. Like NBA players, you know,
we don't talk about it. It's crazy how little we
talk about that. The head coach of the Portland Trailblazers
was arrested for throwing games because of gambling debts.
Speaker 1: Like, this is where the league is right now.
Speaker 2: NBA players arrested for not for the pension health insurance scheme,
right That's that's one thing that's its own tragedy. NBA
players arrested for betting on their own games. I mean,
this is where we are as a as a sport
and a league right now, and as a sort of
broader sporting culture because it's not just a pro basketball thing.
Speaker 1: But yeah, I just I.
Speaker 2: Really I've been I think about as I found the
NBA about as distasteful in the last month or so,
as like as I can think of in a month
in in my time doing this.
Speaker 1: And again, I mean, like I said, I don't know
that the Clippers are innocent. I have no idea.
Speaker 2: They could have broken the rules, they could get in trouble,
they could deserve to Maybe I'll read of the report
when it comes out and go, yeah, I'm as they're
idiots who have done this and they deserve the punishment.
But this process for it, this side show that has
been running for the last year, is just really embarrassing
for everyone involved. And you know, it caps off for me,
Rob what has been, like I said, the last month
in the NBA has really been, you know, disinteresting to me.
And maybe this is a moment to switch gears a
little bit and talk about that, because the Clippers got
involved in some of the recent news in a very
minor way, with Lebron James finally after a month of suspense,
choosing to join the Philadelphia seventy six ers in free agency,
and then the Clippers stepping in and doing their part
to take on Jeni Broom's contract from the Sixers, as
well as a second round draft pick from the Sixers.
So let's go away for a prickwick. When we come back,
we can talk about some of the small moves.
Speaker 1: Around the edge the Clippers have made recently.
Speaker 2: All right back here on the lob of the jam
the podcast. So Rob, Yeah, Jenni Broom. Yeah, Like most
most players who are young and come to the Clippers
without much experience, you are convinced that he has no
hope of an NBA future.
Speaker 4: Tell us why that's correct.
Speaker 3: So, Jane I Broom was the thirty fifth pick in
last year's draft. He was the National Player of the
Year in college that season and at Auburn he led
Auburn to a top seed and nca tournament. He led
the team in points, rebounds, and assists. Pretty impressive. He
was also old. He was twenty three when he was drafted.
He's twenty four now. He's not a young player. He
was spent five years in college, and he's a power forward.
And he's played eleven games in the NBA. He played
a good amount in the G League, not like a ton,
but a good amount some some form of a sample size.
And his played in summer league. And you know, training camp, preseason,
all that, and every Sixers fan I know, and I
know I know more Sixers fans than probably any other
fan based outside of the Clippers, every Sixers fan thinks
he's hopeless and terrible. And again you can point to
the eleven NBA games, not very much. I don't know
how many of them Mutch and the G League maybe
a little bit, but I guess between Summer league and
preseason and just the few times they maybe have seen him,
he has not appeared remotely like an NBA player. And
I think, really, the reason why, the reason why a
player of his like you know, pedigree in college right
like national player of the Year at like a school
like Auburn, top seeing the NCAA tournament, like real results,
why he fell so far? You need to look no
further than the NBA combine stats from that year. There's
five different stats here. There's seventy nine players in listed
who went through the draft combine. He is second worst
max vertical leap. The rest of the bottom guys are
all centers.
Speaker 1: He was.
Speaker 3: Seventh, yeah, seventh worst standing vertical leap. He was fifth
worst shuttle run and like ninth or tenth worst in
terms of three quarter sprint. Basically everything I think lay
in agility. He was like in the bottom third, but
not like one of the very bottom and everything else.
He's one of the very worst athletes in the draft.
And sometimes you see guys who are bad athletes who
it's like, oh, they're able to make stuff happen, But
apparently he just looks incredibly slow, incredibly unathletic, and he's
a power forward who, like, because of those limitations, is
not really a rim protector. He can't really break people
down off the dribble. He was a high usage guy
in college, so he's not great at like role player stuff. Really,
he's like a score who doesn't really do very much else,
And that's like the worst position to have, that archetype,
because the modern power forwards are kind of the most stereotypical.
Speaker 4: Usually role player types.
Speaker 3: You think of Aaron Gordon, you think of og Anna Nobi,
you know all these other you know, Jalen Williams on
the Thunder, Like these guys who kind of do a
little bit of everything are usually not like superstars, kind
of play defense, can shoot, can handle all that sort
of stuff. To my really offers very little that he
can score, but he did not score very efficiently in
the G League, and he's only like an okay rebounder
and everything else. That's kind of bad, so like he's
not old right like, and he's barely played in the NBA.
The NBA sample size is basically non existent. Like it's
not impossible he's an NBA player, but it's it's pretty
unlikely at his age, and like only OKG League performance
and his really truly pretty abysmal draft combine measurements. It's
it's really hard to see much of an NBA future.
But the Clippers did this for the pick, Like they
got a decent second round pick out of this. And
you know, at the very least, Broom, who guaranteed contract
for this year, is a power forward and the Clippers
need a depth of power forward. They only had one
true power forward on the roster in Riach Mura. I
guess Baba Miller is kind of going to be a
power forward. We have yet to see really what position
he's going to be. I think he kind of slots
in it power forward.
Speaker 1: Kobe Sanders is kind of the backup power forward.
Speaker 2: I think, yeah, which he's like he's not a power forward,
but he kind of does do the Niko Batouma thing.
Speaker 3: So yes, but like he's not a power forward in
today's NBA, and so Jenni Burn provides like some depth
at a position of need. He is a flyer who
the Clippers got an asset and like a decent second
round pick to take on. And his contract is only
guaranteed this year and then it's non guaranteed next year
and team option the year after, which is basically non guaranteed,
so if he's really bad or doesn't play, the Clippers
can either easily trade him or cut him or whatever
later on in the season. So it was it was
a totally fine trade. They got an asset for basically nothing,
just a roster spot. And the other piece of news
we hadn't really mentioned but kind of discussed in our
Summer league wrap up last week me and Shop was
that Cam Christy was really bad in summer League. They
pushed its guaranteed it day back to after training camp,
and this just makes it even more likely it was
already pretty likely, even more likely that the Clippers just
wave Cam Christi and jan I Broom kind of takes
the spot as the last player on the roster just
because he's even though he's older, he's at more of
a position of need.
Speaker 4: And I think that's really all this trade was.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I think, just to be clear, Rob, when we
talked about the last spot on the roster, I think
that the Clippers have I think that right now I
would say that Broom is like in spot fourteen and
Christy is in spot fifteen.
Speaker 1: So if they do wave Christy, they will have an
open spot.
Speaker 2: Of course, there's there's a couple loose ends out there
right as far as I mean the Peyton Watson thing,
I don't really know what to say about it at
this point, but technically the quiet Leonard trade isn't done
so that something could still be folded into it.
Speaker 1: But also, like Benedict.
Speaker 2: Mathrin's restrict free agency is what comes to my most
immediately as kind of like, well, maybe if the Clippers
don't keep Mathine, then they do keep Christy for the
year as an extra guard on a cheap deal. But
if Mathurin resigns, he takes Christie's spot. I think the
Clippers actually are probably likely to waive Christy and try
to resign him to a two way contract. That kind
of seems like par for the course for me, with
the way that that his career is gone and how
they tend to manage those sort of edge guys. I
don't see him getting a contract with another team, so
it probably makes the most sense for him to just
resign on a two way and play for San Diego
for the year. But yeah, this Jenni Broom deal, I mean,
I don't I guess I don't care to just absolutely
trash young you know, I know you say twenty four
isn't young, But I don't care to just to absolutely
trash guys, maybe as much as you do. But but
I think that, Yeah, you missed the part where you
said you're sure he's a very nice guy and a
good teammate.
Speaker 4: I didn't even say that because I don't know that yet.
But he needs to work his way up to that.
Speaker 2: No, the most important thing is that someone you follow
on Twitter watched him play garbage time in January last.
Speaker 3: Year and summer LYE can't forget something most important thing.
Speaker 2: But but yeah, I mean, I think, look if if
the sixer spot that Jani Broom was going to be
a good NBA player on the contract that he is
on right, which is a cheap deal next year guaranteed,
a cheap deal the year after not guaranteed, and then
I believe a team option for the year after that,
So potentially three cheap.
Speaker 1: Years of Jani Broom if the Sixers thought he was good.
Speaker 2: As they're navigating the like we brought in the massive
Jalen Brown contract and we're still trying to see if
Joel Embiad's ere gonna get healthy, and we have to
pay Tyree s Maxy and we have to pay Vjang
right Like, if they thought that he was going to
be like a useful player at two million dollars a
year for the next few years, they absolutely would have
kept him.
Speaker 1: So this was a cut. Basically, the Sixers needed to
cut Jennie Broom. They did not think he was.
Speaker 2: Worth rostering at two million dollars. But they also couldn't
just cut him because they didn't want the money to
be dead on their salary books. So instead they traded
that money to the Clippers, and they compensate the Clippers
with the second round pick. I will very briefly tell
you all what that second round pick is. The Sixers
have or prior to this trade, the Sixers had three
second round picks for twenty twenty seven. The first is
their own pick. The second is the better of either
Golden State or Phoenix's and the third is the best
of oklah Sahoma City, Houston, Indiana, and Miami.
Speaker 1: So these are the three picks.
Speaker 2: Pick number one is Philly, pick number two is better
of Golden State and Phoenix. Pick number three is best
out of Oklahoma City, Houston, in Dana, Miami. Whichever those
three picks end up being next year, the Clippers will
get the middle of the three. So Philadelphia's pick presumably
is going to be very late in the draft because
Tyre Spacks, Jlen Brown, Lebron James Joel Embiid, Golden State,
Phoenix pick should be a decent Whichever is the better
of Golden State or Phoenix should be a decent pick.
I would imagine that one of those teams gives the
Sixers a pick in the.
Speaker 1: Top ten of the second round next year.
Speaker 2: So then I think from the Clippers perspective, you're really
looking at that third pick.
Speaker 1: Is it going to where's that going to land?
Speaker 2: Oklahoma City is obviously going to be good, Houston we
expect to be good, Indiana we expect to be good,
Miami we expect to be good. So but how good
are each of these teams going to be? They're not
all going to be some of the top five teams
in the NBA may that maybe if one of them
has a probably best case scenario is one of those
teams has a disappointing year, right, and the Clippers put
themselves in a position where they can get a pick,
you know, maybe in the late thirties or early forties.
The Clippers don't have their own second round pick next year,
so you know, nice to get a pick in the
middle of the second round. It's not a big deal
asset wise for the team, but it's not nothing. And
I think you look at like, what are what are
they going to do with that last respart? Honestly, Rob,
even if they cut Broom in training camp, this trade
was worth it because the Clippers have so much space
right now between where they are and where the luxury
tax threshold is that really they could cut Jeni Broom
in training camp and what they would have done is
bought you know, let's say the forty second pick in
next year's draft or the forty sixth pick in next
year's draft.
Speaker 1: For two point two million dollars.
Speaker 2: So if you start looking at it like that, right,
and they didn't even have to pay you know, teams
have a limited amount of cash they can use each.
Speaker 1: Year in trades.
Speaker 2: The Clippers didn't even need to touch their like designated
trade cash because they didn't actually trade the Sixers money.
They just took on a debt from the Sixers in
exchange for getting that draft pick from them, and they
just can cut him a check for the two point
two million and send him home and take the pick.
So yeah, I mean, it's it's a very small little
piece of business for the Clippers, but it's not a
bad little piece of business.
Speaker 1: It's a it's a it.
Speaker 2: Is a very small but unambiguously positive is how I would.
Just like. It's a good move, but it's very minuscule.
It's not necessarily a needle mover in any way. But hey,
if that draft pick becomes sweetener that you attach to
contract to get something done mid season, or if that
draft pick becomes you know, you package that with the
late first that the Clippers will have next year to
move up into the early twenties, or whatever combination of.
Speaker 1: Things you can do.
Speaker 2: Right, It's a little margin victory, and the Clippers need
these little margin victories.
Speaker 1: They also.
Speaker 2: Signed a another big man to a two way contract
Jamari and Sharp. Now, Rob, I know I was giving
you a little bit, a little bit of trash talk
for how eager you are to rip these prospects apart
with your teeth when the Clippers acquire them.
Speaker 1: But Jamari and Sharp might be you.
Speaker 4: Know, he's a nice guy.
Speaker 1: I might not have to I might not be able
to defend him as much. What do you want to
tell Clippers fans about Jamari and Sharp?
Speaker 3: Yeah, shape, and I very very briefly mentioned him last week.
He's huge, He's like seven foot five. I think he
can kind of move, Okay, I just I don't think
there's really much of any basketball skill there. He really
can't score, he's not a great rebounder. Those are two
things you'd hope for for a guy who's seven foot five. Really,
it's just kind of like Janni Broom. It's just emergency
front court depth. Jannakoenniederhauser apparently is like doing well in
his rehab in his recovery, he's still probably not gonna
be ready at the start of the season. Even if
he is, the Clippers will almost certainly want to bring
him along slowly. Outside of that, they're big men are
an ancient Brook Lopez and Isaiah Jackson, who's a backup,
and you know, if one of them is in foul
trouble or one of them gets injured and Yanick is
still out, Like having a guy who you can throw
out there for eight to ten minutes of center play
is helpful, especially on a team that now like does
not have small ball center options right Like Nick Patoum
is gone, Kawhi Leonard presumably is gone, John Collins is gone.
The power forward they have on the roster is Rui Hachimura,
and he's not nearly a good enough defender to go
small ball five with. So I think it was you know,
I don't think Sharp is good. He won the G
League Defensive Player of the Year last year, but that's
basically just for his room protection. I don't think it
will have that impact in the NBA, and like he
just does not do basically anything else on the court.
But yeah, I mean, you know, you could probably throw
him out there for six eight minutes and he'd be
so huge and provide like a little bit of defense
at the rim that he you escape his minutes unscathed
just because of that those factors. So yeah, like again,
it's a two way deal. It's like basically a risk
freet move. And again it was at a position kind
of need, like once Gionic is healthy, it won't be
And honestly, my guess would be they probably cut him
and sign someone else, but just as emergency depth, without
having to sign a guy to an actual roster spot,
it's totally fine. So, yeah, like him and Broom shore
up the front court, which is pretty thin. And you know,
if either of them actually turns into anything big win,
I would find either of them doing that unlikely, but
like it's not impossible, and if they contribute even like
a single good game or two, then it's just a
win because the Clippers basically gave them nothing to get
either of them.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and I think the like the odds of either
of these guys being you know, I mean, maybe one
of them has at some point, like a game where
they come in in the third quarter because someone is
in foul trouble and someone.
Speaker 1: Else is hurt and they have a good little shift
or whatever.
Speaker 2: But you know, the Clippers, I think, from the perspective
of not having not knowing what's going on at center
post Zubats, right, I think they are kind of doing
what you would want them to do, which is they're
just taking some flyers on. You know, I know that
these guys aren't nineteen, right, but like they're both twenty four,
they are earlier in their careers, right, they there may
be some type of growth or fit or trajectory for them,
and neither of them are really exciting as individual prospects.
But when you look at like, hey, Brook Lopez is
your starting center, Jannik Coneniederhauser is the guy who you're
probably most invested in in the position, but he had
a major injury in the spring and won't be ready
for the start of the year. I thought the Clippers
were really in a position this summer where investing resources
into getting a center was not wise, both because I
think the Clippers are going to be you know, bad
next year anyway, frankly, I mean mediocre at best year anyway.
Speaker 1: So you don't invest long.
Speaker 2: Term resources into short term improvements when you're not going
to be competitive anyway. And by competitive I mean competitive,
you know, like in a postseason meaning not like I
hope the Clippers are competitive, you know, night tonight. But
I also think that you know, so you don't want
to make this big investment. You don't want to make
a big investment to go get someone because you don't
want to stunt Yanick. But also Yanick isn't a sure
thing and he's hurt right now.
Speaker 1: So you go and you get some guys, right and
who knows, probably both of them are going to end
up stinking.
Speaker 2: I think Boba Miller is another guy who you kind
of go and get, And I don't know if Boba
Miller is like maybe the Clipper's best small ball five
option at this point, although again he's a second round rookie.
So to your point about not having an option, that
if your only option for something is a second round rookie,
then you don't have it. It's the way that I
think about it in the In the NBA, anything you
get from a second round rookie should should be gravy.
It should never be expected as a feature of the
team going into the year. So yeah, I mean, I
think I'm just reminded of Moses Brown and going to
watch the Clippers play a preseason game in Seattle and
take driving my dad up there and watching He's like, WHOA,
who is that guy?
Speaker 1: And I'm like he's very tall, but he's very bad.
Speaker 2: And then throughout the game he just you know, Moses
Brown was so active as a player. He's like always
always the center, like everything was revolving around him, and
he was like, Wow, he's like the most influential player
on the court right now, and.
Speaker 1: He's the worst player on the court right now. It
was kind of like.
Speaker 2: Russell Westbrook so often the most like he had the
most influence on the game that was unfolding around him,
and he was the worst of the ten players on
the court Clippers Russell Westbrook, of course not thunder Russell Westbrook,
but yeah, that's kind of what I'm expecting from the
Sharp experience as well.
Speaker 1: It's like, man, that guy's tall. Man, that guy's bad.
Jan I Broom, Jani Broom.
Speaker 2: You know, if he's taking over as the Kobe Brown,
you know, power forward who can't shoot at you know,
at least he's actually tall, which Kobe Brown was like
probably six or five.
Speaker 3: So Kobe Brown getting a two ideal look at Kobe Brown.
Speaker 2: Yeah, Kobe Brown, you know, another guy like yeah, getting
a two radial is exactly the encapsulation of that pick
for the Clippers as well.
Speaker 1: So yeah, I don't know.
Speaker 2: You Let's let's go for one. Let's let's go for
one more quick break, Rob, we'll come back. We'll talk
about if we think there's anything coming up for the
Clippers in August. All right, back here for the lot
of the gym in the podcast. I don't know if
we have a full segment here for you folks, but Rob,
let's talk. Let's talk about what's next, what's coming for
the Clippers. What are you it's August first, what are
you looking out for in the next week or two?
Speaker 3: I mean, I think it's really just Benedict Mathrin. I
the Clippers have not been linked strongly to Peyton Watson
in a couple of weeks, and I just I they
could get him, but I think it would be pretty difficult.
They'd have to make at least one, if honestly, maybe
multiple other trades just to get in a position to
I think sign and trade for him properly.
Speaker 4: But I just don't think they're gonna do it.
Speaker 3: Denver is asking for one rotation player and a first
round pick, and I just I personally do not think
Peyton Watson is worth that, plus giving him the actual
contract that he and his agent want, because that's a
risk in and of itself, and then giving up like
an actual rotation player. Presumably it would be Derek Jones
Junior and a pick, a first round pick. I know, thanks,
and I like Peyton Watson. Like if it was strictly
just like a sign and trade just for the salary,
I would even be a little wary of that. I
think it's a track record of being like a truly
impactful player is pretty small, but like the age, his
archetype is a rare one in the NBA, there's some
track record, you know, of productivity, but like if you
add in like what the Nuggets are asking for in
a sign and trade, I just don't think it's feasible
for the clib and I think other teams make more
sense for him. So I am kind of ruling out
the Peyton Watson thing I've been ruling out as strong.
I would find it pretty unlikely. I have zero idea
what they do with Matherin. I just if they really
liked him, I think they would have resigned him already.
So I think the fact that it's dragging this late
tells you that he's not really a priority for them.
Speaker 4: There have been rumors.
Speaker 3: It's funny because when Chap and I did the podcast
last week, I was like, there's been no teams connected
with Mathurin and literally, I think, like thirty minutes later,
mark Stein mentioned the Pelicans and a mystery team which
was later revealed to be a Bulls I think one
other team and maybe the Nets that might have been
another team.
Speaker 2: Yes, I think there was a Bulls reporter who said
that their interest was overstated.
Speaker 3: Correct, it's probably agent propaganda.
Speaker 4: I have no idea.
Speaker 3: I have no idea. I would expect it to get
resolved before training camp one way or another, whether it's
him take the qualifying offer, whether it's him coming back
on some sort of like a two or three year
deal to the Clippers, whether it's a sign and trade.
Like I expect it will happen in the next like
two months, whether it happens in the next two weeks,
could not possibly tell you. It's it's possible. It's not
like I don't think it'll happen.
Speaker 4: As to what.
Speaker 3: Actually happens, no clue, but I would be pretty surprised
if he came back to the Clippers on like a
real sizeable deal, because I if that was available to him,
it would have happened already.
Speaker 2: Yeah, and you know, the qualifying offer can uh like,
if he was going to take the qualifying offer, he
would take like a two year deal or something like.
Speaker 1: It's it's not going to play that way. I don't
think so.
Speaker 2: Yeah, I mean, I think I don't know what's gonna
happen with Matherin. I do agree with you if the Clippers,
I'll put it this way there because I know there
are fans out there who think that, like Matherin is
a starting shooting guard. He's gonna, you know, can score
thirty points, right, we know the talent. If the Clippers
thought that he was like a guy for them, they
would have given him like a four year, sixty million
dollar deal. He would have taken it because he doesn't
have a market in that range. It would be a
bargain for a starter. But the Clippers don't think of
him that way, and other NBA teams don't think of
him that way either. I mean, he's not efficient, he's
not He doesn't read the game at a high level
in terms of his decision making with the basketball. He
does have a lot of talent. He has some tools
he's a guy who I think, really, you know, we're
talking about, like, you know, twenty four year olds and
if they can ever learn anything new at.
Speaker 1: That point or if their life is over right.
Speaker 2: And I think that Matherin is a guy who I
look at at twenty four and think, yeah, two years
from now, I think he could be a good starter
in the NBA.
Speaker 1: I think he has the talent and the tools.
Speaker 2: I don't know that I think he will be because
I think that there are decision making and mentality pieces
that aren't there for that, which is why I think
the Pacers were ready to move on from him when
they did, and why I think the Clippers if the
Pelicans want to give him an offer sheet that the
Clippers are unwilling to match. I don't know that there's
a lot of space there in terms of like what
the Pelicans can give him with the mid level exception
that the Clippers would be categorically unwilling to match to
keep him and then try to trade him later. So
the Pelicans probably would, you know, could be motivated to
pursue a sign and trade, and I don't know that
the Clippers would be particularly demanding in a sign and
trade for Matherine because I don't think they really want
him or his contract on their books going forward. But also,
if all you're going to get is like a second
round pick and a trade exception, maybe you do just
keep the guy who you know can score to thirty points.
I mean this team, frankly, this is a Clippers team
that has more offensive talent than defensive talent. Yes, but
it's also a Clippers team that is low enough on talent.
Speaker 1: It's low enough on.
Speaker 2: Talent generally that I don't think they're in a position
to just say no to Benedict Matherne. Because Benedict Mathrine
can score the ball and win you basketball games as
much as he can you know, hurt you at other
times with some of the decision making. So yeah, I
don't know. I'm not super eager to see mathin back.
I didn't love the Benedict Mathrine experience as a Clipper.
I think for me, the best case scenario would be
if the Clippers sign and trade him out and get
some type of actual positive return for him. I don't
know that it won't be whatever it is, it won't
be a substantial one, but could they get, like, you know,
I don't I would have to look at at the
Pelicans draft see in the situation, but you know, or like,
can they get like the you know, the worst of
whatever pick in whatever year, or the you know, the
right to swap but not into the lottery one year
or something, you know, some type of thing that's like, hey,
maybe the Clippers, you know, maybe in the twenty thirty
two NBA Draft, the Clippers have a chance to move
up from pick twenty three to pick sixteen because they
got a future swap as part of this math and
sign and trade like some some type of capital like
that would I think be enough for me to sort
of be like, well, you know, it was thanks for
thanks for those few good games that.
Speaker 1: You're out of March, and you know, good luck in
New Orleans.
Speaker 2: But if they if it's just gonna be like a
second round pick and a trade exception or something, then
I think I would roll with bringing Benedict Mathern back,
you know, let him, let him have the floor to
audition a little bit for the coming year. The Clippers
are going to need, you know, some games where he
can score in bunches. It's not going to hurt their
prospect of being competitive on a night tonight basis, and.
Speaker 1: Yeah, so we'll see how that plays.
Speaker 2: I think the ideal, like the real perfect version of
this would be if they can get whatever they get
from the Pelicans and reroute it into somehow satisfying Denver
for Peyton Watson. I think I will also say Denver
talked about they want two first round picks for Peyton Watson.
Now they're saying they want a first round pick and
a quality player. If they were getting these offers, there
would be deals. So you know, I don't think we
need to say, oh, the Clippers need to find a
way to get Denver Derek Jones Junior and a first
round pick if they want Peyton Watson. Well, if the
Clippers were willing to do that, they would have Peyton Watson.
So whatever price Peyton Watson, if he is traded, whatever
the trade package is, and whichever team that goes to,
will be less than Derek Jones Junior in a first
round pick, because I'm pretty sure if the Nuggets could
get Derek Jones Junior a first round pick, they would
now taking in Jones's contract with their second a print situation.
I don't need to get into all of that for
everyone right now to explain why it's not just that simple.
But all of that is to say, when you see
stuff about Denver's asking price, just remind yourself, no one
has met that asking price yet, including the Clippers, and
they will end up trading him for less than that
asking price, because that's just kind of the nature of negotiations.
Any closing thoughts there, Rob.
Speaker 3: No, I think we kind of covered everything, and yeah,
I mean I we might take a little bit off.
August is the single quietest month of the NBA calendar.
I would say September is also pretty quiet, but you
start getting close to the season, you know, players start
to organize many camps and all that sort of stuff.
August is usually completely dead unless there's some sort of
international tournament.
Speaker 4: So we will.
Speaker 3: We will be If there's any news, we'll be back.
If not, it might be it might be a couple
of weeks, and then we'll probably slowly start uh to
work together previews of the coming season.
Speaker 1: Yeah, I think we will.
Speaker 2: We will be keeping our eyes on, first of all,
any actual Kawai news and not like Pablo Torre is
plugging a new episode where he's going to drop some
bombshell two days from now, and then doesn't actually say
anything new or interesting, right, Like, we're actual Kawhi Leonard news.
Maybe schedule news, Rob, I know that you love schedule
release in the NBA that should be coming sometime in August.
Speaker 1: Although I heard, I can't remember.
Speaker 2: I want to give credit to whichever national reporter it was,
and I can't remember who it was.
Speaker 1: With confidence, I.
Speaker 2: Think in the Athletic said that the NBA's schedule might
be delayed this year because of how long Lebron James
took to choose a team, and they like don't know,
you know, they want to put him primetime on Christmas,
but they don't know which team he's going to be
playing for, so they had to wait. But we'll see
that sometime in August, you know, So anything with Kawhi,
anything with Peyton Watson and.
Speaker 1: Some schedule stuff maybe. But yeah, we are we are
into the.
Speaker 2: Dead zone of the NBA calendar and time to get
ready for some college football.
Speaker 4: I think, yeah, go Blue Gorge.
Speaker 2: All right, that'll do it for this episode of the
Lob Jam the podcast. Thank you all for listening to us.
We're you listen to us from if you like the
show please leave us a five star review on whatever
platform you're listening to, it really helps, and as always,
of course go Clippers.