Howard Lutnick And His Trip To Congress (Part 3)
The transcripts from Howard Lutnick’s closed-door appearance before Congress painted a picture of a witness trying to minimize both the depth and duration of his relationship with Jeffrey Epstein while lawmakers confronted him with records suggesting far more contact than he had previously acknowledged. Lutnick repeatedly described his interactions with Epstein as “inconsequential,” insisting he only met with him a handful of times and claiming he cut ties after a disturbing 2005 interaction inside Epstein’s Manhattan townhouse. According to the testimony, Lutnick said Epstein made sexually suggestive comments about massages during that visit, which he claimed immediately disgusted both him and his wife. However, members of the House Oversight Committee confronted him with emails, schedules, and business records showing contact continuing years after Epstein’s 2008 conviction, including meetings at Epstein’s townhouse, discussions involving a shared business venture, and a 2012 lunch visit to Epstein’s private island alongside Lutnick’s family
The transcripts also showed lawmakers growing increasingly frustrated with what they viewed as evasive answers and shifting explanations from Lutnick as more documentation was placed in front of him. Democrats in particular accused him of misleading the public for years about the true extent of the relationship, especially after previously portraying Epstein as little more than a casual acquaintance. Lutnick attempted to explain away the continued contact by claiming the encounters were brief, social, or business-related and that he never witnessed any criminal behavior or saw underage girls around Epstein. He also reportedly walked back previous public comments suggesting Epstein blackmailed powerful people, telling lawmakers he had only been speculating and had no firsthand knowledge of such activity. Republicans on the committee largely defended Lutnick and argued Democrats were trying to weaponize the hearing politically, while critics argued the testimony further demonstrated how many powerful figures continued associating with Epstein long after his criminal conduct was already publicly known.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
source:
HGO126550 Lutnick Draft-pdf2_Redacted-Update_RedactedV3.pdf
Speaker 1: What's up, everyone, and welcome to another episode of the
Epstein Chronicles. In this episode, we're getting right back to
the Howard Lutnik transcripts from his interview with Congress mister Emmer.
Question did mister Epstein ever fly on one of our
of one of your private planes? Answer no? Question did
you ever fly with mister Epstein on any aircraft? Answer no,
I had no other personal interaction with them, just the three,
So I'm happy to say no, but there by definition no,
since I had no personal interaction with them. Question to
the best of your recollection, when was the last time
you communicated with mister Epstein. Answer It's the one email
exchange in twenty eighteen, and that's the only one that
I know of actually. Question, thank you, Secretary. The Committee
is also investigating Maxwell. Do you know Glenn Maxwell? Answer
from the newspapers. Question have you ever met Kallayne Maxwell? Answer?
I met her once? Question can you explain to me
and the committee when you met her? Answer to the
best of my recollection, I met her once. It was
at a Rockefeller Institute fundraiser in New York City. Question
and what was the nature of your conversation with miss Maxwell?
To the best of your recollection. Answer meaningless inconsequential. Mister
Grant pops in. Do you know roughly what year this
meeting would have occurred? Lutnick, I do not. Spector asked
a question, now, did you know where to be affiliated
with Jeffrey Epstein when you met her? Lutnick? No, question
by mister Emmer. Who else was present when you met her? Answer? Well,
it was a charity fundraiser for Rockefeller Institute, which is
the premier medical research institute in New York, which is
adjacent to New York Hospital. Question thank you, Secretary Lutnik.
In two thousand and five, police in Palm Beach, Florida
began investigating Epstein. In two thousand and six, Epstein was
arrested for the first time for soliciting prostitution for minors.
When did you first learn of Jeffrey Epstein's two thousand
and six arrest Answer, I don't recall whether when or
whether I knew that, so I just had no recollection
whether I knew that or not Spector. Mister Epstein reportedly
had to register as a sex offender after he was
convicted of that two thousand and six offense. Were you
ever notified by way of him being your neighbor. Will
you ever notified about his status? Secretary Lutnik, No spector.
Did you have children under the age of eighteen during
that time? Lutnik? Yeah, Emmer. And to be clear, did
you ever have any reason to suspect mister Epstein was
sexually abusing young women and girls? Answer no. Question did
anyone around you ever discuss mister Epstein's arrest in Florida?
Answer not that I can remember. Question Secretary Lutnik, You
touched on this in your opening statement, But to be clear,
you visit Did Little Saint James Epstein's island in December
of twenty twelve? Is that right? Answer? In around just
before Christmas twenty twelve, I visited the island for lunch
with my wife, my children, my friends, my friend, his wife,
their children, and my staff for an hour I did.
I'm not sure I knew the name of it either.
Question If I said that your visit was on December
twenty third of twenty twelve, would you dispute that statement? Answer?
I would not, Emmer. At this time, I would like
to introduce as majority exhibit one. This is EFTA two
one five one five three zero, and I'll give you
a moment to review question, so I'll read it into
the record. This is an email from Tuesday, November twentieth
of twenty twelve, sent by Leslie Groff. The subject line
reads Jeffrey Epstein. The email reads, how well mister Lutnik,
Jeffrey Epstein understands that you'll be down in Saint Thomas
over the holidays. Jeffrey requested I please pass along some
phone numbers to you so the two of you could
possibly get together. Any numbers you wanted to pass along
to Jeffrey would be great as well. I will say
it appears that you are the recipient of this email.
Do you recall receiving it? Answer? It may be helpful
for you to understand that if the email says how
are Lutnik or Lutnik Howard, those went to Matthew Gilbert,
they didn't go to me. They were not meaning I
would never see them. They went to Matthew Gilbert. You
know if they went to me, if they're listed as
HWL and because I received hundreds of emails sometimes thousands,
and they went to Matthew Gilbert and I would not
see them. So these would have gone to him and
I would not have seen them. Question. I understand, and
for the record, that's why Matthew Gilbert would have been
the individual who responded to this email. Is that right answer?
I mean he would respond sometimes in his name, but
he would also respond sometimes to the same email in
my name. Question. And you discuss the invite in your
opening statement, but I'm going to ask you again, how
did your visit did Little Saint James come about? Who
coordinated it? Answer? What I still cannot understand is this
November twentieth, How or why without any communication for years,
would you inexplicably know where I'm going. It's unsettling, actually,
but this is how it happened. You know, I don't
know why it happened, but this is you're actually literally
seeing it how it happened. But it's inexplicable that he
would and his staff would know where I was going
to be. I had no interactions with them. Question, So
to be clear, you didn't reach out yourself to tell
mister Epstein that you were going to be in the
US Virgin Islands over Christmas? Is that right answer? Yes, Yes,
that is correct. I did not in any way contact
or have any connection to them. Question, and it would
be safe to say that the invite surprised you. Answer,
I find it unsettling and inexplicable. Question who else was
involved in coordinating the trip to the island? Answer? I
have no recollection, so I can't give you more information.
I just have no recollection of it. Question. During our
review of the documents that have been released, it appeared
that your wife may have been in contact with mister
Epstein's team. Did she ever say anything to you about
the island visit? Answer? Not that I can recall now, no, specter,
do you know if anyone on your staff or anyone
else close to you had a connection with mister Epstein
or his staff. I'm just trying to understand how he
may have been aware of your travels. Lutnick, me too,
I find it inexplicable and unsettling, and just reading this
sort of it's bothersome. So no, I don't know. Emmer.
So you are live on the island on December twenty third,
to the best of your recollection, Can you describe the
events what happened when you arrived on the island. Lut Nick, sure,
so it's fourteen years ago. I went for lunch with
my wife, my four children, my friend, a couple with
their four children, and staff and boat staff. So it
was probably fifteen or sixteen people went for lunch. We
sat outside, had lunch. It was boring. We left. Spector,
did this friend and their family that was with you
have any prior connection with mister Epstein? Or were they
there as your guests and for your visit to your
neighbor Lutnick. They were there as my guests, but I
don't know, and I've never heard that they had any
contact with them whatsoever spector prior or subsequent to the
visit Lutnick, prior and subsequent Spector, thank you question by Emmer,
mister Epstein didn't offer you a tour of the island
while you were there? Answer no other than we walked.
I think like from where we had lunch, there was
like this, To the best of my recollection, it was
like a cliff, so we went to sort of look
at the water. Question what was the nature of your
conversation with mister Epstein during the visit? Answer meaningless and
in consequential. I was with my wife and my children
and my friends, another couple in their children who was
a big crowd, and we had lunch and we left. Question,
besides the group that you arrived with, who else was
present on the island? Answer just staff. You know we
were outside under sort of a cover outside area, that
was it. Question Did you see any young women or
girls on the island? Answer no? Question and I asked
this in the context of the New York town Home.
But did you notice any weird or unusual artwork when
you visited the island? Answer no, I wasn't inside any building.
I don't recall being inside any building. Question and you
never visited the island again? Is that right? Answer? That's correct? Never.
Question did you ever hear rumors about the island? Obviously
now it has the nickname Pedophile Island, Nothing of that
sort prior to or around the time you visited? Answer no,
of course not. In twenty nineteen, we all learned lots
of information, but nothing before then. Question there's a photo
that was released I believe in the Epstein File Transparency
Act and has been reported. Are you aware of the
photo of you on the island? Answer yes, question and
that was or what you were describing of looking over
the cliff. Would it be safe to assume that was
when the photo was taken. Answer yes, it's entirely confirmatory
that photo. Specter. Had you seen that photo before it
was released by the Department of Justice? Lutnick No question
by spector. Did you know what it existed? Lutnick, No,
mister Emmer. At this time, I would like to introduce
majority exhibit and these are photos that were released by
the Department of Justice as part of the Epstein Files
Transparency Act. Lutnick. Majority Exhibit number two was marked for identification. Emmer.
Question and for the record, these are images showing multiple
mass of different male faces hanging on the walls of
a room at mister Epstein's Island, with a aunt his
chair in the middle of the room. Secretary Lutnik, when
you visited Epstein's Island, did you see or enter this room?
Answer no question. Have you seen pictures of the mass before?
Answer no question. The reason that we introduce this is
many people online have speculated that one of the masks
resembles you, specifically the one on the first page in
the middle. What's your response to these claims? Answer, you
got to be kidding me. That's the most ridiculous and
absurd thing I've ever heard what a bald man I
have hair? Look, I mean I don't have many, but
at least I have some that is not remotely me.
That's nonsense. Question. Thank you. During your visit to the island,
did you discuss the company Adfin Solutions with mister Epstein? Answer?
No question. What was adfin Solutions? Answer? It was a
company that attempted to create an exchange for online ads.
They went out of business. Question Were you personally an
investor in Adfin Solutions? Answer? No question. Was Canter Fitzgerald
an investor and Adfin Solutions? Answer yes to this. Mister
Twellinger jumps in, mister Emmer, just so the record's clear.
I believe there's different redacted. We can't hear over here. Turwilger. Sure,
Just so the record's clear, Mister Emmer, I think you
may want to ask which part of counter Fitzgerald there's
multiple subsidiaries, or the secretary could offer a little bit
more information. Which part of Cantor was an investor? Emmer?
Which part of Canter Fitzgerald was an investor? Answer Canterer
Fitzgerald has a subsidiary that did venture capital investing with
small investments in many companies in sort of high risk investments,
and then those would then have subsidiary companies that might
be for each particular investment. It was called Canter Ventures,
and so the company would be called CV. So Canter
Ventures would be CV. But it was a venture capital
alarm of counter Fitzgerald, sort of multiple layers down the
subsidiary chain. Question. And the reason that we ask is
there was a stock purchase agreement that was released as
part of the Epstein File Transparency Act that you signed
on behalf of CV A FH and mister Epstein signed.
Did you know that mister Epstein was an investor in
this company adfin Answer no question. When did you learn
that he was an investor? Answer to the best of
my knowledge, when these documents were released, best to my recollection.
Question And would you have been aware of all the investors,
whether they were individuals or entities, in any of Kennter
Fitzgerald's portfolios. Answer no, of venture capital investments, no question.
And for the record, had you and mister Epstein ever
invested in the same company prior to this occurrence? Answer no,
not that I know of. Mister Grant jumps in the
signatory page from the investment to Advin Solutions. You said
you had not seen or I'm sorry that you let me.
You're a phrase. It's common for another investor in a
VC deal to have the page from another investor. Ludnik
no I found it inexplicable and unsettling that he had
that it was released, that my company's signature page would
be in someone else's files. It's unsettling, Emmer. And when
a stock purchase agreement is executed and the individuals are signing,
they're typically not in the same room. Is that right,
Ludnik That is correct, mister Grant. And do you have
any idea of how mister Epstein would have come across
that page? Answer from Ludnik no I find it inexplicable
and unsettling, mister Emmer. At this time, I'd like to
introduce majority Exhibit three. And this is an email that
you are not a recipient of, dated May fourth, twenty thirteen,
from Jeffrey Epstein to David Mitchell discussing ad Finn and
a potential meeting between you and mister Epstein. Question, mister secretary,
do you know who David Mitchell is? Answer yes, Question
how do you know him? Answer? He was the husband
of one of my wife's friends. Question were you in
contact with them during this period of spring twenty thirteen?
Answer I may have been. Question when did you understand
his relationship to be with Jeffrey Epstein? Answer I don't
recall knowing that he had any relationship with Jeffrey Epstein.
Question and what we're specifically interested in here? One it
says one of the line says, I think I'm seeing
h Lutnik later cool restaurant in Williamsburg. Do you recall
meeting Epstein at a restaurant in Williamsburg in May of
twenty thirteen? Answer? I did not. I mean this seems
to think that David Mitchell was planning on seeing me,
not mister Epstein. But as I testified, the only times
that I recall ever seeing him are the ones that
we've gone through already, Mister Emmer. At this time, I'd
like to introduce majority Exhibit four. And this is an
email chain dated May twenty eighth, twenty eighteen, between Jeffrey
Epstein and a redacted email labeled HWL it's Big bat
smart EFTA one zero five zero seven seven two Lutnik.
Majority Exhibit number four was marked for identification. All right,
we're going to wrap up right here and in the
next episode dealing with the topic, we're going to pick
up where we left off. All the information that goes
with this episode can be found in the description box.