Mega Edition: Alex Acosta, The 2011 Statement About Epstein And The Missing Emails (7/11/26)
The missing Acosta emails refer to a nearly year-long gap in the inbox of Alexander Acosta, then the U.S. Attorney in Miami, during the most critical stretch of the Jeffrey Epstein negotiations. According to reporting on a court filing by attorneys for Epstein survivor Courtney Wild, the DOJ had not turned over significant documents tied to the 2007 non-prosecution agreement and had not clearly disclosed that Acosta’s inbox had a “data gap.” That gap reportedly ran from May 2007, when a draft federal indictment had been prepared, to April 2008, just before Epstein’s state plea effectively ended the federal case. That timing matters because it overlapped with Epstein’s legal team aggressively lobbying Acosta’s office and senior DOJ officials to avoid a federal indictment and secure the state-based resolution instead.
The DOJ’s Office of Professional Responsibility said the gap did not affect Acosta’s sent mail, found no evidence of intentional deletion, and attributed it most likely to a technological error. But that explanation has never erased the larger problem: the missing inbox material landed exactly where the historical record needed to be strongest. OPR later concluded that Acosta exercised “poor judgment” in resolving the case through the NPA and failing to ensure victims were properly notified, but the missing emails left survivors’ attorneys arguing that the government’s record was incomplete at the very moment the most consequential decisions were being made. In plain terms, the emails matter because they could have shown what Acosta was receiving, who was influencing him, what pressure was being applied, and how much of the Epstein deal was driven by internal DOJ judgment versus external lobbying by Epstein’s powerful defense machine.
to contact me:
bobbycapucci@protonmail.com
Speaker 1: And welcome back to the Epstein Chronicles. One of the
things I like to do when we're discussing this case
is go back in time and look at news articles
from years gone by, and you can see how this
story has changed over time, how it's transformed over time,
and how the legacy media loves to use revisionist history
talking about how nobody knew what was going on with
Jeffrey Epstein. Well, I say, that's a bunch of bs.
And the proof of that is all of these articles
that you can still find if you just do a
simple search that we're telling the story about who Jeffrey
Epstein was.
Speaker 2: Here's the truth.
Speaker 1: The people that were still associating with them, the people
that were still hanging out with them, they didn't care.
Speaker 2: That's the truth.
Speaker 1: So today we're going to go back in time once
again and go all the way back to twenty and
eleven to an article from The Daily Beast. This article
was authored by Conchetah Sarnoff and Lee Aiken. Headline, Jeffrey
Epstein how the hedge fund mogul pedophile got off easy.
So at least they call him a pedophile in the headline, right,
And this was in twenty eleven. Nowadays, you can't even
get the legacy media to admit that he committed crimes
right oh, his alleged victims, his alleged trafficking survivors, No,
nothing alleged about it. Documents obtained by The Daily Beast
reveal how pedophile hedge fund mogul Jeffrey Epstein escaped tefty
jail sentence despite overwhelming evidence of sex crimes with dozens,
that's dozens folks of young girls. Kancheatah Sarnov and Lee
Aiken on how the fear and intimidation experienced by survivors
during pre trial proceedings, combined with a ferocious, protracted campaign
to undermine the prosecution, culminated in a set of charges
that became a virtue will slap on the wrist. Now
we all know that twenty twenty two, we all know
the story well, but remember this is twenty eleven when
this story was published. So for all the people out
there that act like they had no idea what was
going on, that's a lie. This was out in the
Daily Beast, this was out in other publications, So I
don't want to hear we had no idea who Epstein
was Why is Prince Andrew palling around with this dude?
It is proving difficult for Hedge fung Hedge fund manager
and registered sex offender Jeffrey Epstein to avoid the glare
of media scrutiny. British tabloids most recently cried foul over
the shabby royal comportment of Prince Andrew in agreeing to
be the guest of acknowledgment of the pedophile, but the
larger mystery surrounding Epstein, who completed a thirteen month sentence
for soliciting prostitution from a minor in twenty ten, has
remained unsolved. How did the hedge fund mogul manage to
finesse the kind of sex crimes allegations typically associated with
a hefty prison sentence, And that's really what it comes
down to, right, How does someone like Jeffrey Epstein avoid
serious jail time for these obviously very very serious crimes
that usually carry a very long time in jail twenty thirty,
forty fifty years, But he gets thirteen months in a
county stockade, a county lockup, and nobody's supposed to have
any questions about that? Huh? For the first time, the
US attorney who oversaw the Epstein prosecution in Florida's Southern District,
is commenting publicly on the case in a letter released
exclusively to The Daily Beast. This letter, along with other
correspondents on Earth and R reporting, sheds new light on
the no holds barred battle waged by Epistein's lawyers to
evade the full exercise of prosecutorial power. So remember this
is twenty eleven, before Alexander Acosta was even considered for
a role in a presidential administration. Why would anyone, and
I ask this honestly, why would anyone have alex Acosta
as part of their administration? Are you kidding me? Right now?
You don't have people that are vetting people like Acosta
for these positions. All it would take is a simple
Google search or a Duck Duck Go search or whatever
browser you use, and you could come up with this information.
So why would anyone want this guy to be part
of their administration. Some of the most shocking allegations against
Epstein surfaced only after the conclusion of an FBI probe
in civil suits brought by the survivors. For example, the
claim that three twelve year old French girls were delivered
to him as a birthday present, but the FEDS did
identify roughly forty young women, most of them under age
at the time, who described being lured to Epstein's Palm
Beach home on the pretense of giving a massage for money,
then pressured into various sex acts, as well as the
Balkan sex slave. Epstein allegedly boasted of purchasing from her
family when she was just fourteen. So that's Nadi al
Marsonkva obviously right again, now that we have hindsight to
guide us, we know what that is. And we also
know that it was Jean Luke Brunel who allegedly provided
these twelve year old triplets to Jeffrey Epstein for his
birthday for him to abuse. We heard that right from Virginia.
We've heard it from other sources. And that's why I
am so adamant at this point that Nadia marson Cova
should be looked at in a different manner than these
other women because she was brought in at such a
young age. You're purchased from about it for a minute, okay,
your parents sell you to some disgustoid and then you
end up in their atmosphere, in their orbit, and your
whole life, this kind of abuse is normalized, so of
course you're going to think that this is the right
way to go, like this is how normal people live.
So when we're talking about Nadia marson Cova, it's a
whole different ball of wax for me, and my opinion
on her and her involvement here has evolved over time.
When I first started looking at this, I just lumped
her in with the other core four members. But when
you get down into it and you get into the
weeds and you follow the evidence, to me, anyway, it's
rather obvious that Natio marson Cova was somebody who was
groomed and was dragged along into this. More recently, a
big cash payment from Mail on Sunday coached one of
Epstein's main survivors out of anonymity to describe what she
claims her years as a teenage sex toy. This survivor,
Virginia Roberts, produced a photo of herself with Prince Andrew
in two thousand and one and reported that Epstein paid
her fifteen thousand dollars to meet the prince, then seventeen
years old. She claims that she was abused by Epstein
and loaned to his friends from the age of fifteen.
Now again another girl who was brought into his orbit
when she was young. And you see, there's the issue
for me. If you're brought in when you're malleable, right,
a young teenage girl a little bit younger than that,
maybe even it's a lot easier for these sick bastards
to manipulate you mentally and for them to create this
sort of picture in your brain that what you're doing
is okay. And Jeffrey Epstein and Glenn Maxwell were professionals
at that Sex crimes of the kind Robert's alleges took
place typically carry a term of ten to twenty years
in federal prison. Yet when all was said and done,
Epstein served his scant year plus one month in a
private wing of the Palm Beach Jail and was granted
a sixteen hour per day free pass to leave the
premises for work. Now, how many of you out there
have friends who have been to prison or maybe yourself,
were you ever afforded that kind of those kind of privileges,
you could leave jail, go to work.
Speaker 2: Do whatever you want.
Speaker 1: Of course, you weren't because you're not rich, because you
weren't running around with a bunch of other so called elite.
A Daily Beast examination into the inner workings of Epstein's
defense strategy reveals how the fear and intimidation experienced by
survivors during pre trial proceedings, combined with a ferocious, protracted
campaign to undermine the prosecution, summed up as the best
defense is an all star offense culminated in a set
of charges that became a virtual slap on the wrist
for the globe trotting financier for the pedophile. And that's
why I'm so adamant about a full look into what
went on down in Florida as well. I know I
go hard on the SDNY, and that's because they're considered
the most elite prosecutor or prosecutorial office in the nation, right,
so they should be doing a better job.
Speaker 2: But what went on down.
Speaker 1: In Florida, Yo, this is a straight up abortion of justice.
The prosecutors in Florida and everybody involved down in Florida,
they should all be looked at. Because Epstein manipulated everything
that happened down here. He was able to finagel and
maneuver himself into a position of only getting thirteen months.
And this next segment was the actual letter from Alexander
Acosta to the deadly Beast. Over the past weeks, I
have read much regarding mister Jeffrey Epstein. Are words opening
an extraordinary letter written by our Alexander Acosta, who served
as US Attorney for the Southern District of Florida during
Epstein's criminal investigation. Mister Acosta goes on to detail how
in two thousand and five, a young girl first brought
sex crimes allegations to the Palm Beach Police Department, which
sought felony charges against Epstein. Subsequently, however, the state attorney
agreed to charge him only with one count of aggravated
assault with no intent to commit a felony.
Speaker 2: Acosta rites.
Speaker 1: He notes that such a charge whatever resulted in no
jail time, no registration as a sexual offender, and no
responsibility for restitution to Epstein's underage survivors. So basically what
he's saying is he's the hero here of folks. Mister
no spine, limpiass backbone, alex Acosta set himself up as
the hero.
Speaker 2: You're no hero, You're just.
Speaker 1: Another Yes, man that went along with this absolute travisy.
Frustrated by the state attorney's decision, the police referred the
case to the FBI, which handed it to the US
Attorney General's office. After reviewing the charges, federal prosecutors agreed
that the state charges were insufficient Acosta rights. In a
script that could have been lifted from Law and Order,
his team gave Epstein two choices. Plead to more serious
state felony charges or prepare for federal felony trial. Well
that never happened, right, and you might ask yourselves, why
is that? Well, we're about to find out. The next
passage is where things get really interesting. What followed was
a year long assault on the prosecution and prosecutors. Epstein
had assembled a world class legal team including Allen I
Kept my Pants on, Dershowitz, Kenneth Starr, and Roy Black,
best known for having defended William Kennedy Smith against rape
charges in Palm Beach. One member of the defense team
warned me that the offices excess zeal in forcing a
good man to serve time in jail might be the
subject of a book if we continued Acosta rights. In
his view, excessive zeal more aptly describes the actions in
Epstein's camp. Defense counsel investigated individual prosecutors and their family.
So why didn't you put a stop to it? Your prosecutors?
Let Jeffrey Epstein and his lawyers run rough shot over
you and your whole ass office. Who's the blame for that?
If it's not you? Often felt to negotiate in good faith.
They would obtain concessions as part of a negotiation and
agreed to proceed, only to change their minds and appeal
to the office's position to Washington. Oh well, there you go, folks.
Let me be very clear once again, it was not
Alexandra Acosta making these decisions on his own. He just
told you that. Okay, they appealed to Washington, d C.
Who was in DC at the time, Mukasey, Right, Well,
just follow the trail. Who was mcazy associated with, what
were his associations, and then you come to the reasoning
at how Epstein and his lawyers can manipulate this situation. Remember,
you're not paying for your lawyer for what he does
in the courtroom. You're paying for who he knows behind
the scenes, how many judges chambers he can access, and
when you have the team that Jeffrey Epstein had. Do
you really think that these guys had trouble accessing the
very highest levels of DC or any of these judges.
Of course not. That's what you're paying for. That's why
it costs you twenty five hundred an hour. Undeterred, Acosta
stuck to his position that Epstein must agree to the
three criteria he had laid out, jail time, registration as
a sex offender, and restitution to survivors. Acosta's account is
supported by his second document, obtained by The Daily Mail Beat.
By The Daily Beast, a five page letter written by
Assistant US Attorney and Marie Villa Fauna to another of
Epstein's lawyers, Jay Lefkowitz, during the period when both sides
were hammering out the eventual plea agreement. The indictment was
postponed for more than five months to allow you and
mister Epstein's other attorneys to make presentations to the office
to convince the office not to prosecute, Villafana writes, conjuring
the degree of pushback apparently central to the team strategy,
those presentations were unsuccessful. Villa Fauna also mentions her efforts
to ensure that Epstein would serve time in a federal
prison camp and not a state prison, which would be
far rougher environment, particularly for a child molester. So Ann
and Anne Marie Villa Fauna was over here acting like
she was helping the survivors, but at the same time
play in ball with Epstein's lawyers. So she was playing
both sides of the fence here, and that's always been
my interpretation of her involvement. Villafano marshall these facts in
the process of strenuously disputing apparent charges of misconduct by
the defense. I continue to work with you in a
professional manner, even after I learned that you had been
proceeding in bad faith for several weeks, thinking that you
would fool our office into letting mister Epstein plead to
a non registerable offense. And the whole entire time that
they were trying to maneuver, they were reaching out to
the bosses in DC, they were reaching out to the
Muckesy's office and the Department of Justice leadership. What do
you think they were doing just hanging out eating cereal.
At another point in her letter, Villafano refers to an
apparent allegation of self dealing in the selection of an
outside attorney who would represent the forty odd survivors identified
in the probe. In a somewhat unusual arrangement, Epstein agreed
not to contest his liability in any civil suits brought
by these survivors, and in fact pay for lawyers to
represent them. So take all of the alleged and shove
it okay. Epstein admitted numerous times that he did this shit,
and he did it with hubris and in a straight up,
in your face manner, and nobody had anything to say
to him. Huh, nobody wanted to stop them. Yeah, thirteen months, man,
that's all you're gonna get for this, No big deal.
In her letter, Villafana denies any personal interest in the
choice of attorney and goes on to say, your attacks
on me and on the survivors established why I wanted
to find someone whom I could trust with safeguarding the
survivor's best interests in the face of intense pressure from
an unlimited number of highly skilled and well paid attorneys.
Imagine being some girl from the other side of the
tracks accusing somebody like Jeffrey Epstein of this and then
getting faced with all of these high profile attorneys that
are basically ruining your life. If they're so brazen and
so comfortable going after prosecutors, do you really think they'd
have any qualms going after survivers. Responding to a request
for comment on a Costa's account of events, Roy Black
wrote The Daily Beast on Thursday that I can't reply
to a letter I haven't received. I can't give a
reason to response without examining the files and being able
to refresh my recollection of events that occurred years ago.
Black went on, I do not believe any of the
things you mention occurred, except for the fact we did
exercise our right to appeal to the Department of Justice
to determine if a federal crime had been committed. There
you go again, folks, Remember what I tell you about
the little golden nuggets that we get here, That it's
his lawyer telling you, not me. Okay, this isn't me
telling you. It's his lawyer, Roy Black telling you that
they appeal to the Department of Justice. That means mukesy,
that means the bosses about all of this and what
was going on? Now, you mean to tell me that
those guys had nothing to do with a slap on
the wrist here, huh okay, it's all a Costa's fault.
Other Epstein attorneys contacted by The Daily Beast did not respond.
The US Attorney's Office for the Southern District of Florida
had no comment. Why did Acosta decide the Voice's opinions now?
In part, he clearly is reacting to ongoing criticism that
Epstein's puny punishment did not fit his crimes. Some may
feel that the prosecution should have been tougher. Acosta Rites
evidence that has come to light since two thousand and
seven may encourage that view. Many survivors have since spoken
out physical evidence has since been discovered. Acosta may also
have chosen to come forward now because on Monday, attorneys
for a number of those survivors filed the suit under
the Victim's Crimes Rights Act to challenge the non prosecution
agreement that ultimately resulted from all the wrangling, claiming that
they were not consulted. The US Attorney's Office, now led
by Wilfredo A. Ferrar, has indicated it will file a
response to the suit on April seventh. Now, remember this
was two thousand and seven and they brought this suit
in two thousand and excuse me, twenty and eleven, and
they brought the suit in twenty and eleven, and it
was still ongoing all the way through all these years.
Now ask yourselves, why is that the case. Don't you
think a case like this would be heard in a
timely manner and not dragged out through the courts. The
fact is this, the government doesn't want to be transparent here.
They don't want to give you all of the details
of what went down because it makes them look absolutely horrible.
In his letter, Acosta also takes issue with the way
Epstein's sentence was carried out. Although the terms of confinement
in a state prison are a matter appropriately appropriately left
to the State of Florida, without doubt, the treatment that
he received while in state custody undermine the purpose of
a jail sentence. Indeed, Epstein's brief confinement likely reinforced a
perception that he had merely succumbed to a nuisance suit.
Such a gross misapprehension would help account for the apparent
ease with which Epstein has rejoined the ranks of the
social elite twenty eleven. Folks, Remember this is before the
second arrest, when all of these people welcomed them back
with open arms. Katie Kirk, Woody Allen, and George Stepanopolis,
among others, attended a dinner party he hosted for Prince
Andrew in December, and New York authority seemed to be
either unaware or unconcerned that his Upper east Side home
is within one thousand feet of an episcopal preschool and
violation of sex offender laws. You know, it's all just
such a big ass joke to these people, all of
these people who are supposed to safeguard folks, who are
supposed to protect the vulnerable. They made a big joke
at all of this and acted like these survivors and
what they went through didn't matter, and they thought they
were never going to have to hear about it again.
They thought this boom bomerang was never going to come
back and slap them in the head. Well, guess what.
The boomerang has arrived and the slapping has begun yet.
A source tells The Daily Beasts that Epstein's legal troubles
may not be over. Talk about foreshadowing, huh. It is
possible that as an outgrowth of the two thousand and
seven Florida investigation. Federal investigators are now looking into allegations
of money laundering and other financial misdeeds. Boy, would wouldn't
that be nice? How long have I been telling you
this is a financial crime. They knew it all the
way back then, and they didn't chase it down because
people like Mukasey and the bosses at the DOJ told
them not to. Now can I prove that with documentation?
I cannot. But if you add up all of the
things that we have heard from Acosta and others involved,
it's obvious who was pulling the strings here. And if
you think some second rate Florida state attorney general or
I mean federal attorney general is going to be pulling
the strings of investigation like this into Epstein, I don't
know what to tell you because this comes from on high.
Villa Fanna notes at the end of her letter to Lefkowitz,
you accuse me of broadening the scope of the investigation
without any foundation for doing so, by adding charges of
money laundering and violations of a money transmitting business to
the investigation. Again, I consulted with the Justice Department's Money
Laundering section about my analysis. The duty officer agreed with
my analysis. So that's the FBI telling you right there, folks,
that there was money laundering going on, a whole ass
lot of it too. Villa Fauna knew it, their office
knew it, the DOJ knew it, and they refused to act.
So keep this all in mind what we just talked about.
Next time you hear somebody talking about how this is
all Lacosta's fault, it is not. He is somebody who
played a part, and a big part, no doubt about it.
But he ended up really being the fall guy. And
when we use fall guys, we don't ever get to
the real problem, de we. So the people who were
really at the levers of power here, the people who
were really making the decisions, once again, get off scott free,
and we turn all of our anger, all of our
ranker towards Acosta.
Speaker 2: And while he definitely deserves it.
Speaker 1: Again, I have to keep reiterating that because I don't
want you to think I'm saying, oh, A Costa is
a victim here.
Speaker 2: He is not.
Speaker 1: He is a spineless coward who should have stepped up
to the plate. But I'm not willing to just stop there.
Other people might just want to go hunting for a
regular old deer, right me. I'm looking to go trophy hunting,
and that means I want the people who are behind
the decisions. Those are the people that need to answer
questions because they're the ones who made these decisions and
let Jeffrey Epstein, in the wake of those decisions, continue
to abuse people. Somebody needs be accountable for it, and
all these years later, unfortunately, still nobody is. All Right, folks,
it's gonna do it for this episode. If you'd like
to contact me, you can do that at Bobby Kapuchi
at ProtonMail dot com. That's bo bb Y c apu
Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can also find me
on Twitter at Bobby underscore cap you Cci. The link
that I discussed can be found in the description box.
It comes to light now that a year's worth of
emails for mister Acosta vanished from two thousand and seven
to two thousand and eight. Where did those emails go?
Speaker 2: Oh?
Speaker 1: But the government says it's just a glitch. It affected
a lot of people. Does anybody really believe that? So
it was a glitch with the video cameras, It's it's
a glitch. With the emails. Everything's just coincidence, and none
of this adds up to a much darker, more devious picture. Huh,
that's what you would have us believe. Well, I'm sorry,
but I don't believe it. I don't believe it for
one single minute. These emails just happened to disappear. Ha.
I'm sure the NSA has them. They have all the
metadata and all the other information from everybody else. Pretty
sure that they probably have those emails too, don't they.
I find it very hard to believe that a year's
worth of emails from this crucial period of two thousand
and seven and two thousand and eight just happened to disappear.
And it's a glitch, you say. Now, we know that
Jeffrey Epstein had some very powerful friends for a very
long time that spanned numerous presidencies. Did somebody in power
pull on a lever to get rid of these emails,
knowing how damning they were? It's above these people. They
don't have the capability to do something like this. Of
course they do. We're talking about the FBI, we're talking
about the intelligence services. There is nothing out of the
realm of possibility for these people these are kingmakers.
Speaker 2: These are nation topper. They topple nations. These people you
think it's above their pay.
Speaker 1: Grade to get rid of some emails that might, you know,
lead to a place they don't want anyone to go.
And look, I'm not saying that's exactly what happened, right,
I don't have the evidence for that. But what I
am saying is this, I don't believe that all these
coincidences are just coincidences. There are way too many of
them around this case. I am not a conspira theorist
in the least. You'll never catch me piping off about weird, wild,
nonsensical bullshit. But when things don't add up, they don't
add up. There is way too much that has occurred
in this case, from Jeffrey Epstein's death all the way
back to this first investigation that they would want us
to believe is just coincidence. And I'm sorry, I don't
believe that it's statistically possible for all of this to
just be coincidence. Not when you add up everything around
the case, everything that was Jeffrey Epstein in general, and
then you add in all these coincidences and you look
at the big picture and it's really a hard pill
to swallow, to buy that narrative that they're trying to sell.
And with these emails, of course they're gonna say, oh,
it affected multiple people or a bunch of people, and
but I honestly I don't believe it, again a gli
or was it something that was done on purpose by
who the hell knows? Again, we know that Epstein was
rolling with some of the most powerful people in the world,
prime ministers, presidents, leaders of industry, leaders of science and academia.
Speaker 2: You don't think.
Speaker 1: It would be possible for insert whoever to try and
clean up a little bit of the mess by getting
rid of these emails. I mean, it's something that we
have to talk about and think about.
Speaker 2: At the very least.
Speaker 1: I just I'm not willing to buy their explanations anymore.
Speaker 2: They've been nothing but untruthful with us.
Speaker 1: They've been very guarded, they've been everything but transparent, and
they have sold us some whoppers, expecting us just to
buy write in folks, I'm here to.
Speaker 2: Tell you I am not buying it.
Speaker 1: They honestly think we're going to believe anything that they say.
And the sad part is there's a good portion of
the populace that believes every single thing they hear on
the news. They don't bother to dig deeper. They have
this trust in the media to do the right thing.
And while I wish I could have that sort of trust,
it just is not reality. The legacy media does not
have anyone's best interest at heart, and this whole entire
situation was just going to be blown up, forever blown up,
and these people are never ever going to be able
to sweep this under the rug. I don't care about
missing emails. I don't care about all the coincidences in
the world. I don't care about the legacy media running
cover for them. We're just gonna keep on keeping on,
and we're gonna keep digging and we're gonna keep talking
about these articles on a daily basis. And these people
are not getting off the hook. I'm sorry, sorry, I'm
not going to just let it go by the wayside
and be like, oh yeah, just miss missing emails. It's
not like this is, you know, a missing email chain
from a Taco Bell employee who got fired. This is
serious shit here, folks. You know, we talk about how
the United States is the world leader and how you know,
the world should look up to the United States. We
can't even keep our own backyard cleaned up. So it's
time that we focus on cleaning up our own backyard
before we try and tell other people what they should
be doing. And we certainly shouldn't be dropping any more
bombs of freedom on anyone anytime soon. We have a
lot of looking in the mirror and some self reflecting
to do in this country, and we need to realize
that these people that we send to Washington, d c.
Are not working for us, and most most times they're
working against us, and we see it here. This will
just go by the wayside. Nobody will be in trouble
and they'll write it off as just a glitch. They'll
never be any firm their investigation. Congress won't care, the
Senate won't care, and it'll be just forgotten by these
people because at the end of the day, they don't
care about any of this. This is not something that
they care about. If any of them cared, they would
have stopped this guy a very long time ago. But
they didn't care. Nobody cared, not the FBI, not the prosecutors, nobody.
This man was able to do whatever he wanted for
all of these years, and people like Acosta and his
bosses get away with bullshit like this, Oh, the inbox
is missing.
Speaker 2: We can't provide that for you.
Speaker 1: Let me or you try that, say the government's coming
after us in an investigation. Let us try that bullshit.
Oh yeah, well I lost that stuff. You know, we
don't have it for you. I'm sure that would go
over real well. Our article is from the Daily News.
The headline cost his email inbox during critical period of
Jeffrey Epstein case missing, author Steven Rex Brown Nearly a
year of emails and Alex Acosta's email inbox while he
oversaw the case against Jeffrey Epstein are missing. The Justice
Department has revealed to the survivor's lawyers during a meeting
on Thursday. Imagine being the person that has to deliver
that news. Talk about showing up and having to break
the bad news to the survivor's lawyers that the federal
government is inept once again. We have to tell you, guys, sorry,
we screwed the pooch here. We really we don't know
what we're doing. Obviously, the emails in the inbox back gone. Sorry,
that's a glitch. We don't know what happened to those.
But the good news is federal officials attributed the gap
from May twenty, two thousand and seven to April second,
two thousand and eight to a technical glitch that wasn't
limited to the former US Attorney for the Southern District
of Florida. Two sources familiar with the Justice Department review
of Epstein's sweetheart deal told The Daily News, and there
it is.
Speaker 2: Well, it wasn't just him.
Speaker 1: So come on, folks, all right, don't be crazy, don't
be a conspiracy theorist.
Speaker 2: Just suck down this bullshit that we're feeding you.
Speaker 1: It's like they want you to just obey, don't question anything,
don't have any kind of critical thought or critical critical thinking.
They just want you to just fall in line, listen
to what they have to say and buy into the narrative. Meanwhile,
they have done nothing to prove their worthiness of us
just believing them, not at this point, not after everything
we have seen, and I don't just mean the Jeffrey
Epstein case. Folks, look at the way these people conduct themselves.
Look at the absolute, absolute shit show that the Department
of just Us is. It is a shame, a dumpster fire,
a clown show. You insert whatever kind of derogatory comment
you want here, and it would be fitting.
Speaker 2: Bill Barr is a failure.
Speaker 1: His predecessor was a failure, and all of them before
them were failures as well, the whole entire lot of them.
It's it's just completely corrupt, and it's unacceptable that it
could be that the Department of Justice could be mismanaged
in such a way. It has such an overreaching effect
on all of our lives, and the ineptitude shown time
and time again, administration after administration is unacceptable, and some
body somewhere in our government has to has to put
a stop to it. There has to be accountability for
this shit. No chain of custody. Nobody got in trouble
for the video missing from Jeffrey Epstein's alleged suicide attempt
the first time around. No chain of custody issues whatsoever
there here, emails go missing, No big deal. We'll just
keep it moving and blame it on a glitch. You're
a conspiracy theorist for asking questions. Though the review made
public Thursday found that Acosta exercised poor judgment but committed
no misconduct when he allowed Epstein to plead guilty to
state prostitution charges rather than face a federal case. The
serial pervert served thirteen months in Palm Beach County jail
despite evidence he ran an underage sex trafficking scheme. And now,
mind you the deal that was cut between Acosta, all
the other attorneys involved, and Epstein's lawyers, and let's not
forget the Justice Department, all of those emails in that
inbox for that year, that period of a year just
magically disappeared. I mean, it's not like, you know, there
was an internal investigation and by the Department of Justice
or anything looking into this stuff. It's not like there
were other people who were interested in this stuff. It's
just very convenient that the emails go missing. Huh, very convenient. Indeed,
Epstein hanged himself last year in a Manhattan federal jail,
allegedly after being slapped with new sex trafficking charges. Investigators
with the Justice Department's Office of Professional Responsibility said they
were able to reconstruct much of a Costa's inbox by
examining his cent folder as well as other staffers' emails.
Are we so we're supposed to believe this? Honestly, folks,
a real talk here. Do any of you believe this
narrative that they're spinning to us, because I just can't.
I can't buy into it. I believe me. I wish
it was this cut and dry. I wish I didn't
have to spend all this time every day talking about
this case. I wish these people would just do their job.
I wish they would have done their job and we
could have had a trial and all of this could
have been sorted out. But no, they have to play
their games. They have to be not transparent, they have
to f around. Well, the bullshit's over. People are done
with the nonsense, all right. It is time for accountability.
It is no longer time for excuses. And if these
people are not held accountable, this shit will continue to
go on and we will continue to see people like
Jeffrey Epstein pop up in our society, because when there's
no repercussions, then why would these people not conduct themselves
in the same manner. The email gap came during a
critical period in the Florida Epstein case, when the sex
offender's powerhouse legal team aggressively negotiated with Acosta and his prosecutors.
Epstein's non prosecution agreement with the Costa's office, which covered
named and unnamed co conspirators, was executed in September two
thousand and seven, an unprecedented deal in Justice Department history, officials.
Speaker 2: Said during the meeting.
Speaker 1: According to attendees, so in all the deals the Justice
Department has ever cut, all the people that have come
through those doors, all of the people that have been
served federal warrants, nobody ever has had a deal quite
like Jeffrey Epstein's. But yet you mean to tell me
I should just accept all of the coincidences around this case,
around Jeffrey Epstein, that's what you're telling me. I am
not buying it. Okay, this guy gets the greatest deal
in the history of great deals, and nobody gets held
accountable for that. The Department of Justice, the Inspector General,
couldn't come up with something, couldn't slap sanctions on any
of these lawyers who were involved in this, of course not,
because it's always about protect our own cover your ass. Now,
we can't make the Justice Department look bad, so we'll
say it was just an error in judgment and a glitch.
In October two thousand and seven, Acosta had an unusual
breakfast meeting at a Miami hotel with Epstein's lawyer, Jay Lefkowitz. Now,
remember Jay Lefkowitz is also the man who told us
that Epstein made an obscene amount of money donation to
the Clintons for their Clinton Global initiative. So this is
someone who's really locked in with Jeffrey Epstein. J Lefu
was a huge part of that team. Him and Dershowitz
were pretty much the frontmen, the guys that were really
running the show. So Lefkowitz was really locked in. He
knows the deal. He had this meeting with Acosta. They
were not talking about their families. They were obviously talking
about this case. The gap was also just revealed Thursday,
despite more than ten years of litigation over prosecutors handling
of the case. All these years and we've never heard
anything about that. It took some bitch ass internal investigation.
And that's the bone they're going to throw us, that
the emails were missing. And they wonder why there are
all these questions about this. They wonder why people are
making documentaries about this. They wonder why nobody trusts the
Department of just Us anymore. Yesterday we were told that
OPR was unable to recover months of emails from Alex Acosta,
who was the US attorney and the person ultimately in
charge of this deal. That raises numerous questions about what
the defense attorneys were telling mister Acosta and why he
continually exercised influence to give a sweeter and sweeter deal
for Epstein, said Epstein's survivor's attorney, Paul Cassel. We intend
to pursue this issue through all possible venues to determine
why these emails were missing and why we were never
told about it until yesterday. Good on you, mister Cassell,
and I hope you guys do go harden the paint
over this, because the more I think about it, the
more enraging it is to me. Like I said, I
didn't even plan on doing a daily drop tonight. I
had other things going on already, I was doing other things,
and I'm sitting here and I'm like, you know what,
this shit can't wait till the morning.
Speaker 2: This is such.
Speaker 1: An egregious move by the Department of Justice. And I
really hope the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals is watching,
and I hope they take this into account. And I
hope that they understand that they're literally the last line
of transparency and the last line of defense of some
semblance of justice truly occurring, because that non prosecution.
Speaker 2: Agreement has to go. It has to go.
Speaker 1: And if I was the lawyers for the survivors and
the Eleventh Circuit Court didn't rule in my favor, I
would take this all the way to the Supreme Court
if I had to. It's that important, it's that serious,
and it has that those kind of long reaching ramifications,
not only on this case but on the nation as
a whole. We have to do some soul searching, folks,
who do we want to be? The email gap is
further fodder for conspiracy theories or more evidence that there's
no conspiracy theory here. This is obviously some sort of
real screw up. Okay, there's something really disgustingly.
Speaker 2: Weird going on here.
Speaker 1: Okay, nobody's talking about no sasquatches, nobody's talking about little
green men, nobody's talking about anything like that. Okay, we're
talking about an absolute failure by the Department of Justice
that is not explained away by the excuses that they're
giving us. And if you're willing to accept that narrative
from them, that basic explanation about what occurred, then more
power to you. I'm not here to tell anybody how
to think me personally, though, I am not accepting that bullshit. Sorry,
I need more answers, all right, I need proof At
this point, the government has done nothing but lie for
ten years. They know about these emails missing, and they
don't tell nobody about it. They don't tell the lawyers
about it for the survivors.
Speaker 2: Why not?
Speaker 1: What else is the government hiding? So I'm guessing it's
going to have to come down to a flurry of
Freedom of Information Act suits to try and get some
information from these scumbags like Angela Clemente did. It's a
sad world, folks, when the people who are in place
to protect us do everything in their power to avoid
bringing people like Epstein and his associates to justice the
email gap. Excuse me, I am a firm believer that
there are no coincidences. Epstein survivor's lawyer Jack Scarola said,
there are a lot of strange things that went on
with regards to this case, a lot of questions that
remain unanswered and not yet adequately investigated.
Speaker 2: That's from the lawyer himself.
Speaker 1: So I guess he's a conspiracy theorist too, right, or
maybe that's something they like to throw around to try
and make it seem like there's nothing here, But folks,
there's a lot here. Like mister Scarola says, there is
a lot of unanswered questions that have not yet been
adequately investigated, and that's a damn shame. The legacy media
has had decades to do this and they failed, like
at everything else they get involved with, for the most part,
their failures. So the investigation continues, the digging continues, the
search for answers continues, and ultimately.
Speaker 2: The goal is justice.
Speaker 1: If you like to contact me, you can do that
at Bobby Kapuchi at ProtonMail dot com. That's Bobby c
ap u Cci at ProtonMail dot com. You can also
find me on Twitter at bobbuy Underscore cap u Cci.
All of the links that go at this episode can
be found in the description box. All right, everybody, I'll
be back tomorrow morning and we'll see what we see.
Speaker 2: Then just call