AI Is Getting Faster. Businesses Still Can't Prove It Works

Hi, I'm Connor with Honor - message me here!

OpenAI released results for its custom Jalapeño inference chip and introduced an Admin plugin that can manage workspace permissions, limits, and routine requests. On the same day, U.S. government research raised a harder question: can businesses connect AI adoption to the economic results they expected?
Connor separates confirmed facts from company claims, pressure-tests the productivity story, and explains why cheaper intelligence does not automatically produce more demand or more jobs. He also gives regular people and small-business owners a practical 30-day deployment test built around one result, one measurement, narrow authority, and human escalation.
The machine is getting faster. Management is getting easier. Proof still has to be measured.
Watch: https://youtu.be/VBB7dATXS4Q
Book: https://BookWithHonor.com
Call: 661-476-2217
AI for everyone. Not just the wealthy.

Youtube Channels:

Conner with Honor - real estate

Home Muscle - fat torching

From first responder to real estate expert, Connor with Honor brings honesty and integrity to your Santa Clarita home buying or selling journey. Subscribe to my YouTube channel for valuable tips, local market trends, and a glimpse into the Santa Clarita lifestyle.

Dive into Real Estate with Connor with Honor:
Santa Clarita's Trusted Realtor & Fitness Enthusiast

Real Estate:

Buying or selling in Santa Clarita? Connor with Honor, your local expert with over 2 decades of experience, guides you seamlessly through the process. Subscribe to his YouTube channel for insider market updates, expert advice, and a peek into the vibrant Santa Clarita lifestyle.

Fitness:

Ready to unlock your fitness potential? Join Connor's YouTube journey for inspiring workouts, healthy recipes, and motivational tips. Remember, a strong body fuels a strong mind and a successful life!

Podcast:

Dig deeper with Connor's podcast! Hear insightful interviews with industry experts, inspiring success stories, and targeted real estate advice specific to Santa Clarita.

1 SPEAKER_00: Artificial intelligence just got his own

jalapeno.

And that's not a metaphor.

OpenAI built a computer chip and named it jalapeno.

Company says the chip can serve artificial intelligence faster

while using less power, maybe more spicy.

Well, on that same day, OpenAI released an administrative tool

that can watch company usage, change permissions, manage

spending limits, and handle routine requests through a

conversation.

Then the United States government published research

saying businesses often cannot clearly connect their artificial

intelligence plans to the economic results they expected.

We bought in a little too quick, apparently.

The machine is getting faster.

Management is getting easier.

Proof is still wandering around the parking lot trying to find

the entrance.

And that's our show today.

Three developments for the last 24 hours.

One custom chip, one administrative tool, and one

government report carrying a bucket of cold water, and one

question running through all three.

Are we creating more value or are we getting better at

describing the value we hope to create?

OpenAI published that first measured results for jalapeno,

custom chip built specifically to run artificial intelligence

models.

Inference is the part where a trained model actually answers

us.

Training is the school.

Inference is the shift after graduation when somebody finally

expects the kid to earn rent.

OpenAI says jalapeno completed between 1.5 and 1.9 times more

artificial intelligence work per watt at peak throughput than the

commercial systems and its comparison.

It also reported between 1.7 and 3.6 times lower to end-to-end

delay across three public models.

That means more answers from the same amount of electricity with

less weighting.

The company tested the chip with a public benchmark called

Inference X.

A benchmark is a standardized test for machines.

It's the artificial intelligence version of lining up 10 pickup

trucks, loading them with concrete, and seeing which one

gets over the hill without leaving a transmission laying on

the asphalt.

Now here's the catch.

OpenAI built the truck, picked the setup, and of course ran the

test and published the brochure.

The benchmark's public, the reported numbers are specific.

That's better than a stage presentation full of glowing

circles and the word revolutionary spelled

incorrectly.

But these are still company results.

They're not yet an independent verdict from years of production

use.

OpenAI says it plans to begin deploying jalapeno inside its

own computer systems by the end of the year.

Plans are not deployments.

The chip is real enough to measure, but the promised

economic effect is still ahead of us.

Why does this matter to a family, a worker, a small

business owner who's never spent a morning comparing token

latency?

Well, because that cost of running artificial intelligence

decides where it can go.

When each answer becomes cheaper and faster, artificial

intelligence stops being something we visit for a clever

paragraph, but it starts becoming something that stays on

the job.

It can answer every phone call, review every incoming document,

watch every service request, now check every invoice, follow

every customer conversation.

Not because it suddenly developed a work ethic, but

because somebody removed the meter that made the constraint

attention too expensive.

While the name jalapeno is almost too perfect, the chip

makes the system hotter, faster, and cheaper.

Somewhere a marketing department looked at a 700-watt processor

and said, what this needs is the name of something we warn our

children not to rub into their eyes.

The larger move is not the name.

OpenAI is trying to control more of the chain.

The models, the software, the chip, the memory, the network,

the data centers, the products we use.

That's called vertical integration.

Plain English, they're trying to own a lot more of the

restaurant, not just the recipe.

The stove, the delivery truck, the building, and eventually the

person and person asking.

You want fries with that.

But you can lower costs.

It can concentrate power.

The same company that builds the intelligence could increasingly

control the machinery that delivers it.

For regular people, the opportunity is real.

Cheaper intelligence means smaller businesses can use tools

only large companies could afford a few years ago.

The guardrail is also real.

We should not build a business that becomes helpless when one

provider changes a price, removes a model, or tightens

access.

Use the best tool, keep our data portable, keep your instructions

documented.

Know what the system does when the preferred model is

unavailable.

A spare tire is boring right up until the freeway shoulder.

The same development moves artificial intelligence deeper

into management.

OpenAI introduced an admin plugin for Jet GPT work and

codecs.

An administrator can ask questions about workspace

activity, review credit usage, add or remove members, change

groups, inspect permissions, adjust usage limits, and handle

supported requests through a conversation.

That tool follows the administrator's existing

permissions.

It does not magically give somebody access that they didn't

already have.

And that does matter.

The dangerous version of Artificial Intelligence

Administrator is not a robot carrying a tie or wearing a tie

and carrying a clipboard.

It's a system with broad permissions, a vague

instruction, and nobody checking what happened after it said it

was finished.

OpenAI says its own information technology team uses an agent to

handle employee requests.

The company reports that developed workflows resolved

about 45% of ticket volume.

It also says support volume roughly doubled while the

backlog was eliminated.

These are company reported results from the company that's

selling the tool.

Useful evidence, but not holy scripture.

Still, 45% is large enough to matter it.

Nearly half the retween tickets can be resolved automatically.

The human job starts to change.

The person is no longer spending the entire day resetting access

or finding a policy and explaining it for the 83rd time

that turning the laptop off and back on is not a spiritual

philosophy.

The human can work on exceptions, security judgment,

the strange cases where the request sounds normal until we

notice the employee left the company six months ago and is

emailing from a fishing boat near Belize.

That's the useful version of artificial deployment.

Routine work goes to the machine.

Authority stays bounded.

Exceptions go to a human.

Every action leaves a record, but we need to pressure test the

labor story.

If one employee becomes three times more productive, the

company doesn't automatically hire three times as many

employees.

That can also happen if demand can absorb three times the

output.

If the company's a fixed amount of work management may reduce

headcount and keep the productivity gain, that's not

pessimism.

That's arithmetic wearing work boots.

Productivity doesn't have to become unemployment.

A company can use the extra capacity to improve service,

shorten response times, build products it can never afford,

expand into new markets, and let human beings do the judgment

heavy work machines cannot own.

But that output or outcome requires a decision.

The technology does not choose whether the saved time becomes

better service, more growth, shorter work weeks, higher

profit, or fewer employees.

Management chooses that.

And that leads directly to the third development.

The United States Bureau of Economic Analysis published a

research spotlight examining what businesses expected from

artificial intelligence and what actually happened later.

The Bureau of Economic Analysis is the governmental group that

measures major parts of the economy.

It's not selling an artificial intelligence subscription.

Its incentive is better measurement, although the

researchers clearly state that the available data has limits.

The study found that businesses predicted their future

artificial intelligence use six months ahead with two percentage

points on average.

That sounds impressive.

Companies were getting fairly good at predicting whether they

would use AI or artificial intelligence.

Using it was not the same as getting the result they wanted.

The researchers compared reasons companies gave for adopting

artificial intelligence with economic measures later.

Early adopters sometime achieved their goals, but often the

researchers could not find a clear connection between the

original motivation and the later economic result.

The data were too coarse to isolate every effect.

So this report doesn't prove artificial intelligence failed.

It proves something less dramatic and actually more

useful.

Installing a tool is easy to count.

Proving the tool changed the business is harder.

We've seen this movie before.

The company buys software.

Everybody attends a webinar, new dashboard appears, three people

receive a certificate.

Six months later, nobody remembers the password, but the

annual renewal knows exactly where that credit card lives.

Adoption is not value.

Activity is not value.

Prompts entered are not value either.

Reports generated are not value.

Value is the customer reached faster.

The mistake caught before it left the building, the invoice

collected sooner.

The product shipped that could not be built before.

The hour returned to a human being.

The deep question today is whether cheaper intelligence

automatically creates more economic activity.

OpenAI argues that efficiency can make more uses affordable.

Economists call this the Javon's paradox.

When a resource becomes more efficient, total use can rise

because new uses become practical.

That can happen with artificial intelligence.

Cheaper answers can create services that did not exist with

every task, required an expensive professional.

A small business could review every consumer call instead of

sampling five.

A family could compare confusing medical bills before making

calls.

A worker could rehearse a difficult conversation with the

words stop getting stuck behind the ribs.

Well, cheaper supply doesn't mean manufacture demand by

itself.

If a bakery can produce three times as many cakes, but the

town still eats the same number of cakes, we don't have an

ambulance or an abundance miracle.

We have a freezer problem.

The opportunity is to use extra capacity for work that was

previously ignored.

Faster follow-up, better documentation, new offers, more

personal service, deeper checking.

That's how productivity can become growth instead of a

headcount meeting with a suspiciously cheerful calendar

title.

Now there's another mistake hiding in the productivity

story.

We keep measuring how fast the machine produces the first

draft.

We do not always measure how long the human spends checking

it.

If artificial intelligence writes a proposal in four

minutes and a person spends two hours finding the invented

numbers, we didn't save two hours.

We bought a very fast liar and assigned somebody to follow it

around with a mop.

That doesn't make the tool useless.

It means the quality control belongs inside the measurement.

The same applies at home.

Artificial intelligence can compare insurance plans,

summarize a school policy, organize a family budget, or

explain a medical bill.

That can save real time, but the final decision still touches our

money, our children, and our health.

The tool can prepare the table, but it doesn't get to decide

what the family eats.

This is where regular people can outperform companies with larger

budgets.

A small operation can see the entire workflow.

We know who called.

We know what went wrong.

We know whether the consumer came back.

Large companies can buy a failed artificial intelligence product

under 11 departments, four dashboards and a meeting called

strategic enablement alignment.

But the time or by the time everybody agrees it didn't work.

The software has a parking space and dental coverage.

We can move faster because we can measure closer to the

ground.

Did the phone get answered?

Did the consumer get served?

Did the error rate fall?

Did we recover time?

Did revenue move?

Those questions aren't glamorous, but neither is

checking the oil.

But the engine prefers it to a motivational speech.

Here's the practical development example.

Take one repeated task in a business.

Customer calls are a good example.

Do not begin with announcing that artificial intelligence

will transform customer experience.

That sentence has escaped from too many conference rooms

already.

Begin with a number.

How many calls came in last week?

How many were answered?

How long did the callers wait?

How many needed a human decision?

And then give artificial intelligence one narrow job.

Answer after hours.

Collect the caller's name, reason, urgency, and preferred

callback time.

Don't let it negotiate prices.

Don't let it promise outcomes.

Don't let it improve policy because it felt creative after

dinner.

Run it for 30 days.

Compare missed calls, response times, appointments, complaints,

and human hours before and after.

That's deployment with judgment.

Small lane, clear authority, measurable result, human

escalation.

The guardrail is permissions.

An artificial intelligence system should receive the least

authority required to do its job.

Read access before write access, draft before send,

recommendation before approve, one consumer record before the

entire database.

The speed of the machine makes permission mistakes more

dangerous, not less.

A person can make one bad change before lunch.

An automated system can make 10,000 and still be early for

the meeting.

Our move today is simple.

Pick one artificial intelligence workflow already running in our

life or business.

Write down the result it's supposed to create.

Write down the number that proves it.

Write down the authority it actually needs.

If we cannot name the result, the measurement, the boundary,

we don't have deployment.

We have a science project with access to the company credit

card.

The chips will get faster, the agents will take more action,

the promotional claims will arrive wearing better shoes.

Our advantage is not predicting every turn, it's the learning

how to measure the distance, control the authority, and make

the move that produces a real result.

AI for everyone, not just the wealthy.

I'm Connor with honor.

We'll see you tomorrow.