← Back to Podcast/Crypto is Making TradFi Markets Better! with Mike Belshe
Episode Transcript

Crypto is Making TradFi Markets Better! with Mike Belshe

Mike Belshe, Co-Founder and CEO of BitGo, joined me to discuss the current state of the crypto market and the TradFi tokenization race.
Topics:
- BitGo IPO on the NYSE 
- Tokenization market 
- BitGo Selected to Provide Stablecoin Infrastructure and Support Distribution for SoFiUSD 
- Crypto market outlook
Brought to you by 🏦 Learn about iTrustCapital’s powerful Premium Custody Account (PCA) and tax-advantaged Crypto IRA platforms https://www.itrustcapital.com/go/thinkingcrypto 
💡Get the (Re)Thinking Crypto Book on Amazon - https://www.amazon.com/dp/B0D2525DYX 
🖥️ Learn Crypto with Expert Commentary - http://MyCryptoCourse.com 
Sponsors:
🌟 Build with BitGo - https://www.bitgo.com/?utm_source=thinking_crypto&utm_medium=brand 
🔐 Safely Store your Crypto with Trezor Hardware Wallets - https://affil.trezor.io/SHlz 
🌟Uphold - Signup with Uphold. https://uphold.sjv.io/gbED4X Terms Apply. Cryptoassets are highly volatile. Your capital is at risk. 
🖥️ Sign up with Santiment to get quality crypto metrics - https://app.santiment.net/pricing?fpr=thinkingcrypto Get 25% discount with code THINKINGCRYPTO 
📰 Sign up for the Free Thinking Crypto Weekly Newsletter https://thinkingcrypto.substack.com/ 
✅ Become a Channel Member - https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCjpkwsuHgYx9fBE0ojsJ_-w/join 
🔥 Buy Merch & support the Podcast https://my-store-574b5b.creator-spring.com/ 
🧙‍♂️Merlin - http://tinyurl.com/MerlinTCYouTube “I am a Merlin partner and get compensated for purchases made through links in this content"this content" 

Follow on social media:
➡️ X(Twitter) - https://x.com/thinkingcrypto 
➡️ Facebook - https://www.facebook.com/thinkingcrypto/
➡️ LinkedIn - http://linkedin.com/company/thinking-crypto 
➡️ Instagram - https://www.instagram.com/thinkingcrypto/ 
➡️ TikTok - https://www.tiktok.com/@thinkingcrypto5 
➡️ Threads - https://www.threads.net/@thinkingcrypto 
➡️ Website - https://www.ThinkingCrypto.com/ 

🔊 Listen to content on Apple Podcasts - https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/thinking-crypto-news-interviews/id1458945676 
🔊 Listen to content on Spotify - https://open.spotify.com/show/221AV5A65v7uYEsuMviVKl

💼Business Inquiries💼
hellothinkingcrypto@gmail.com

⏰ Time Stamps ⏰
00:00 Intro
02:54 BitGo's IPO 
04:41 Crypto maturing
07:56 Tokenization race
17:02 SoFiUSD Custody
20:38 Banks Stablecoin Yield
24:56 Stablecoin and Tokenized Deposits
29:06 SEC CFTC guidance
32:40 Crypto market outlook
39:01 Latest BitGo updates
================================================= 
#Crypto #Tokenization #Blockchain #CryptoNews #Cryptocurrency #Bitcoin #BTC #BitcoinNews #ETF #News #Ripple #XRP #XRPNews #RippleXRP #Ethereum #EthereumNews #ETH #Solana #money #investing #trading #Altcoin #Altcoins #NFTs #Metaverse #Podcast #ThinkingCrypto ================================================= 
The Thinking Crypto Podcast is your home for the best Crypto News and Interviews - crypto, cryptocurrency, crypto news, bitcoin, bitcoin news, xrp, xrp news, ripple, ripple news, ripple xrp, ethereum, ethereum news, cardano, ada, solana, altcoins, defi, news, interviews, podcast, metaverse, nft, altcoin daily, cryptosrus, coin bureau, altcoin news, bitcoin today, markets, investing ================================================= 
Disclaimer - The Thinking Crypto podcast and Tony Edward are not financial or investment experts. You should do your own research on each cryptocurrency and make your own conclusions and decisions for investment. Invest at your own risk, only invest what you are willing to lose. This channel and its videos are just for educational purposes and NOT investment or financial advice. Note that links included in this description might be affiliate links. If you purchase a product or service with the

Speaker 1: I think everyone in the crypto space deserves credit. We

pushed the US stock market to figure out how to

go twenty four to seven. That is crypto do it.

Crypto deserves full credit for this. It would not have

happened if we had not had bitcoin. Obviously, the US

stock markets are not twenty four to seven yet. They

will move in some waves. It'll probably be a little

bit disappointing, but it's coming, and of course this makes sense.

Speaker 2: This episode is brought to you by I Trust Capital.

I Trust Capital gives you a great alternative for buying, selling,

and custodying your crypto assets. They allow you to set

up a self directed IRA, which gives you huge tax advantages.

You can even roll over your four oh one K

to this platform. And they not only offer a crypto,

they also offer gold and silver and as mentioned, the

custody gives you another very safe alternative. So many of

you know about self custody. That's a great option. But

you can also use I Trust Capital's Premium cust City

Accounts also known as PCA. So with the rise of

crypto scams and phishing attacks, a lot of retail investors

are losing their shirts. I mean let's be honest, right,

it sucks to hear that exchanges are getting hacked. Well,

I Trust Capital does things a bit different here. They

use Ford Bank as they're qualified to students, so they're

actually using a bank here, and they have partnerships with

coinbased Prime Fidelity and Fireblocks. They are fully US based

and their client experienced team offers direct phone support, so

not many platforms offer this. This is very unique to

I Trust Capital and folks, most recently we heard from

President Trump that the United States is looking to unlock

for one case to be able to participate in crypto. Well,

you can get a head of the curve by using

I Trust Capital and getting started in that process. And folks,

I'm a user of the platform. I have an account

with them. If you sign up with my link, which

is I Trustcapital dot com slash Thinking Crypto, you can

get an exclusive one hundred dollars funding. So go learn

about this great, safe and awesome way to buy, sell,

and custody your crypto. A great alternative once again with

tax advantages and a lot of safety, very safe compared

to many exchanges, and all the links will be in

a description.

Speaker 1: Check it out.

Speaker 2: Hey, everyone, welcome into the Thinking Crypto podcast. I'm your host,

Tony Edward, and joining me today is Mike Belshi, who

is the co founder and CEO of Bitgo. Bitco is

a digital asset infrastructure company delivering custody, wallet, staking, trading, financing,

stable coins, and settlement services from regulated cold storage. Mike,

great to see you. Good see you again, Tony, how

are you very good? We haven't spoken in a while,

but there were some huge, huge news arount Bidgo going

public a couple months ago, so I'm excited to dive

into that and of course get your take on the

crypto market and where we're at. Let's start with the

IPO on the New York Stock Exchange. Tell us about

the decision to go public and you know what was

that experience?

Speaker 1: Like, well, thanks, Tony, Yet on January twenty second, we did,

we entered into the public markets. We did the traditional

IPO route, which it takes about it a year, so

it's a lot of work in the making. So look,

it's a it's a proud moment. I think the entire

company deserves credit as much as I do for persistence

and continuing through it. Obviously, can't talk about things on

the go forward. But the reason we did did go

public was actually pretty simple. Look, we've been working with

the world's largest institutions for a while. For infrastructure provider,

you can buy and work with Bicco at the self

custody layergies to the Walt Larry work custody layery you

work on the financial service up about and the companies

on Wall Street are predominantly public companies themselves, and it's

so much easier for them to interface to another company

that's public already because you've got this spotlight and for

all of it's you know, faults, the SEC spotlight is

a heavy one, and it means that we have signed

up for all of the financial disclosures, all the risk

disclosures that you know, another public company can need. So

we think this is very good for us. We think

it allows us to work closer with those firms. And also,

you know, we've we're now a OCC charter that's a

national bank, So for custody, it's been moved up to

the highest level of regulation to get here in the

United States. So you put those two things together, along

with the SoC audits and everything else that goes behind it,

and we're really just continuing down the mission of making

sure that people know exactly who we are so they

can count on us absolutely.

Speaker 2: And Mike, you've been building since what one point oh

and two point oh, of course, and now in three

point zero, it feels like crypto is having that moment

where the acid class is maturing at technology maturing, companies

are going public sector's bidgo and others. Do you feel

that same way, you know, given the history of building

in previous cycles, for sure. Look, this takes a long time.

I think one thing, if I want to say, there's

a difference between this and Web one point zero. With

Web one point zero, we had this proliferation of applications

and business models that all came out at once and

there wasn't anything holding it back. There was no regulatory concern.

Speaker 1: Now, of course, in the crypto space there is, and

there's a lot of difference between how different folks are regulated. Now.

Regulation by itself doesn't make great product, doesn't make a business,

doesn't mean that people want to buy it. What makes

this so they want to buy it, of course, is

the product. You've got to be good, it's got to

add value, things like that. So we've got all of

the all of the burdens that you would have in

any business, but on top of it, it's money. And

when it comes to money, we do regulate it differently,

so it takes a long time. Deployments take longer, confidence

takes longer. And then, look, I hope that we are

as a nation turning a corner in terms of being

able to figure out how to embrace innovation in a

way that's responsible rather than just completely thwarting it. So

one answer to innovation that's new that you're not sure

quite how to manage the risk of is just stop it.

Just say hey, we're not going to have it. And

then the problem with that is your economy falls behind

the competitors around the globe that will do it. And

with digital assets in particular, they've finally unlocked a problem

which had never been solved for which is global access.

So all of a sudden, we have digital assets that

are usable everywhere around the planet. Previously, with our monetary system,

we'd taken a path of isolationism, right, we'd said what

we're going to do is we're going to stand up

these banks is the basically the bouncers to us money.

And then if you're not one of those guys are

not already in the system, then you just can't participate

with digital assets, there's no bouncers. It goes everywhere. Everyone

can create this, everyone can move this, and look, this

is coming. It's needed. We have a global economy. Of

course we need global financials. So I would say that,

you know, the comparing contrast between today and you know,

twenty years ago is mainly this. When it comes to money,

it manages a lot more. We do not want people

to get scammed out of their money. We do not

want money to be used for illegal, illegal goods. So

it's harder. It's a little slower, slower than I thought

it would be. We're thirteen years in on this at BICCO.

There's definitely thirteen more years to go. But yeah, everything

moves a little bit slower when it comes to money.

Speaker 2: Pardon the interruption. Hi, I'm Tony. I'm the host of

the Thinking Crypto podcast. I wanted to ask you if

you can please support the podcast by hitting the like

button subscribing. If you haven't as yet, you can leave

a comment below as well, and if you're listening on

a podcast platform such as Spotify, Apple or wherever, you

get your podcasts, please be sure to follow and hit

the five star rating. I'll let you get back to

the content. Thank you so much, So speak you of

thirteen years to go, Mike. The race is on on

Wall Street to tokenize assets. And you mentioned the global

economy and these assets having more of a global distribution,

and we're seeing stock exchanges and much more looking to

go twenty four to seven. So do you think in

ten years' time we're going to have a blending, a

convergence of these markets where it's no longer going to

be crypto and the stock market is just going to

be the market because everything's going to be running on

blockchain rails.

Speaker 1: Everything's going to be digital. Like you don't have to

just take my word for it. I mean, of course

you're caring about it almost every day. We got Morgan

Stanley making huge efforts that are very public about that,

City Bank making huge efforts are public about it. Black

Rocks already in Fidelity, is already in Wisdom, Treetes already

in So I mean just down the line, like all

of these parties are are moving in. Why the digitization

makes that makes the products programmable and it makes it

so that you can be way more liquid. So look,

I think everyone in the crypto space deserves credit. We

pushed the US stock market to figure out how to

go twenty four seven. That is crypto do it. Crypto

deserves full credit for this. It would not have happened

if we had not had bitcoin. So obviously the US

stock markets are not twenty four to seven yet. They

will move in some waves. It'll probably be a little

bit disappointing, but it's coming. And of course this makes sense.

Like the markets you know around the world. What imagine

if you live on completely the opposite side of the

world in Dubai and basically the markets are closed when

you're awake every day. It's difficult to participate in that.

And remember and also the US. Everyone should know. Capital

markets of the US are fifty percent of all capital

markets in the world. There's nobody even close to having

the US capital market. So the idea that the US

markets are closed during the waking hours for most people

around the globe, imagine how much growth we're going to

see when that's no longer true. So, yes, everything's going digital.

Now you can program it, now, you can access it everywhere.

Now you can fractualize things and that gives you more liquidity.

So of course everything's going to be digital.

Speaker 2: So with the race of to tokenization and different assets

getting tokenized, is bit go seeing a lot of demand

from these traditional institutions for custody of tokenized assets. Absolutely, look,

So there's a bunch of different ways forward.

Speaker 1: We just did it. We did the work with Figure

going public on the blockchain I think in February, and

there's a few different approaches. So you've had already the

special purpose Vehicles SPV, single asset products where they create

these wrappers and these are security so they can't trade

them inside the US, and then they give access to

non US people. You can buy those today I think

through crack and through jem and I probably even coinbase,

I'm not sure, but they're okay products, but they don't

trade in the US, and the US, like I just said,

is absolutely capital Marcus. So it's good but not great.

There's also I think a lot of parts that are

just really excited to digitize. Private companies, you know, obviously

like SpaceX, Open Ai, very exciting companies. A lot of

people won't have access to it. Why are people trying

to digitize it so badly well, because if you can

be the first person to build that market, you can

basically charge you know, two hundred basis points to everybody

to exist, which I think is exactly the wrong reason

why you should be digitizing. Digitizing is about open, open networks.

It's about reducing costs, eliminating middlemen in my opinion, but

there's there's there's always a lot of people doing different

types of business. Then, so now the figure product, they're

completely un chain. The downside of that one is that

you actually have to issue the shares directly from the

issuer on chain and that takes work. However, it's going

to build better markets. You know, having seen kind of

what it looks like when you go through this IPO process,

you realize what a game this thing is is. You know,

we're all familiar with the ipo pop. Everybody wants to

get in on an IPO pop. Then, you know, when

a company does go public, for the first six months

is his lockout period. So all you've got is whatever

the flow to shares that were sold kind of in

that beginning period, so that means you've got a small market.

Hedge funds love to bat this back and forth, and

like you know, manipulate markets. They do this all the time.

It's been studied, there's lots of research about it. And

then finally you've got the unlocked that happens where a

bunch of people the majority of this year has suddenly

become available to sell. So what happens shortening happens again.

Going back to Cagney, he went public late last year.

Oh yeah, fall last year, and then he posted that

he had fifty plus percent short interest in his stock,

you know, just before they're unlocking. All right, we can

do much better. We can build blockchain based market which

are going to take all of this on chain. It's

going to make it so that you can see exactly

what's going on. Shorting is going to continue to happen.

You know, shorting is a natural part of any market.

I'm not not complaining about that part. What I'm complaining

about is the processes that we're using are are designed

for playing games for six months. On the financial market.

It's a casino. It's the sec sanctions casino, and we

can do better, so, Mike, in the future. I didn't

answer your final question. So the other part you asked

about was whether the traditional financial firms are looking to

tokenize equities. Yes, there's a whole bunch of different models,

and I can't talk about them because we haven't announced them.

Some of them you've probably heard of, and we do

look forward to participating on those.

Speaker 2: Yes, So would the scenario at play be that a

company goes public let's say in ten years time or

even sooner than that, it goes on chain kind of

what you guys did would figure, and it's more globally

distributed to someone in a country and after go or

in South America can access some of that where they

they can't write now let's say, you know, depending on

the country, and they can simply do it from their

mobile phone.

Speaker 1: Maybe. Look, the SEC has rules about who's allowed to

have access to to the equities and you know how

how they can be traded in which participants. That actually

is going to take regulatory and legislative change. There's there's

nothing you can do about that part. There will be, however,

these SPVs like like what's been created, which can give

you kind of wrapper type access. It's sort of like

an ETF maybe more like a closed end fund, I

guess you would call it. But yes, you will have

more global access. No, but but but more importantly, you'll

have equities that are for grammable and visible on change,

so you'll know exactly what's going on. There's a lot

of speculation as to whether naked shorting happens out in

the in the market is not supposed to happen. It's illegal,

I guess, except when you have a green ship in

an IPO, but that's a different story. And you know,

when it's on chain, you'll know exactly what's going on

all the time, and you'll be able to see who's short.

Interesting thing about you know shorts. You know that the

exchange is published roughly twice a month. You know what

the short interest is in a stock, and it's not

a perfect thing. But anytime you have like some market

designed around as twice a month reporting, I don't it

just sounds pretty arbitrary to me, Like why wouldn't you

want that real time? You know you've got you've got

the the long interest available all the time when the

markets are open, but the short interest, I guess for

some reason those are considered to be special. I don't know,

it sounds fishy to me.

Speaker 2: And to your point, everything going going on chain. It

will make the regulators job easier, but also for the

participants in the markets to be able to see more

of what's happening, more transparency. That sounds like a better market,

a better economics setup in the future.

Speaker 1: Look, I do think we also take out uh A

mid men. So the challenge of the figure model is

that every issuer has to go and issue direct so

it'll take time for that to take full effect. But

there's real benefits when you do that, which is you

kind of take out all the middlemen, you take all

the risk elements. So I do believe there's also going

to be models where we see reg NMS securities that

are wrapped and available and you can start to use them.

I think the number one use case is going to

be securities lending or collateral lending. What you can do

now is you can have your TESLA stock and you

can use that as collateral. Today that can only be

done if you're like really wealthy and you have a

big private wealth management account and prime worker. But that

can be brought all the way down to retail, just

like what we've done with lending against your bitcoin, and

it can be done in a very safe and secure way,

and it can be done a very transparent way too.

Speaker 2: Also, Mike, there's a lot happening on the stable coin

front where that race is heating up since the genius

actor has passed, and there was recent news that a

bitgo was selected to be the stable coin infrastructure provider

and support distribution of SOFI USD tell us about that partnership. Yes,

Security stable coins. You know, we do infrastructure for them.

We've got a service that's got a modular service.

Speaker 1: It's got the tokenization layer, which you can put on

a theorem Penslana, you can put it on a BnB

and a bunch of different different chains. You've got the

mint component, which is being able to take dollars or

any other type of stay cooin converted to your stable

point and barn of course is also a capability there.

And then you've got the treasury. So those are the

three parts, and you know, clients can use our infrastructure

in any kind of piece of that that they want.

In the case of USD one, you know, which is

now about five billion in size, they've used all three

of those things allowed them to market way faster, and

we've got a great partnership there so far. Is coming in.

They're going to use those first parts. They're going to

manage treasury on their own as you would expect their bank,

but they have the ability to take this to their

broad distribution of retail members and really open up the

way payments work. Additionally, you know, you've got people starting

to understand the differences of you know, tokenized deposits versus

stable coins slightly different. I think we'll see products coming there.

Sofi is a stable coin so far, but there's definitely

more to come. And then this is just it's just

better payments. You know, it's twenty four to seven, it's

almost no fees. You know, you can put all kinds

of wallets, so it's it's just a better product. But yeah,

we're proud to have been selected by Sofi. They're great company.

They've been TechEd forward for like forever. They've had a

huge growth story of their own despite being you know,

a pretty pretty large sized company. So yeah, we're going

to continue to see lots of movement on the scape

going in front. The government's got to play in it

in terms of interest, which, as you know, as being

debated like crazy right now. Of course, people should be

able to get interest on their stable coins. We'll see

what the law comes back with. The banker claim that

you know, somehow this is going to cause a deposit

risk of the banks is ridiculous, and it's ridiculous, you know,

kind of with data. We saw the same argument made

back in the early seventies when we first had treasury

backed money markets that gave interest, and of course there

was no run on the bank and we didn't have

a liquidity dry up in that Purcasilly, by the way,

what is going to happen once you do have stable

coins in broad distribution in the US? Lending markets are

going to get tokenized and get better too. And you know,

we're seeing some of this where how do you take

like loans, pull them together and then tokenize them in

a way that you can now make them liquid, So

all of a sudden it makes it so that the

chance of a bank run is like way less because

you can make these loans liquid kind of all the time. Obviously,

there's a lot of maturing in this market to happen.

There's risks in lending, but everybody should be able to lend.

You know, why why is it only this thing that

banks do, like lens of course, they take their own

set of risks. Corporates take their own set of risks,

Governments take their own set of risks. Retail takes their

own set of risks. Everyone should be able to participate

in this. We can make it so that there's no

problem with there's no chance of a bank run by

decoupling the deposits from the lending markets. This is an

antiquated notion. It doesn't need to exist anymore. We can

create lending markets and have you know, stable points savings

deposits side by side in a very very different way.

Speaker 2: Mike, Is it simply these banks look there, the incumbents.

They're going to lose some market share here, and that's

why they're fighting. You know, they don't want to give

up some of the money they're parking where they park

their money of the FED and they just give consumers

zero point zero one percent on interest.

Speaker 1: I think it comes down to the folks that are

borrowing from them are have more power than the folks

that are lending to them. What's really happening is is

not so much the banks taking a lot of profit,

although that's part of it. What's happening is retail is

unknowingly subsidizing lending. So think about it. At the end

of the day, you've got somebody that's lending the money

to the bank, that's the depositor, and we got somebody

that the bank is lending too, that's the borrower. The

borrowers are getting subsidized rates from the depositors because the

banks aren't paying the depositors. So as a deposit you're

getting zero point one percent. You should be able to

get the risk free rate. It's called the risk free

rate for a reason. It's where the bar should be

held for Like, all you have to do is go

put it in T bills and you get four percent,

So it should be four. Now, if they gave four

to the depositors, they would have to give you an

additional They would have to take an additional three point

nine percent from the borrower. So what's really happening is

the borrowers are being subsidized by the depositors. Now you

could already well, no, the bank should just take less.

Maybe you know, maybe it would cause that right. Where

you prevent gouging is competition. You need to have lots

of banks that are competing against each other to kind

of have their feed be lower. But at the end

of the day, of course depositors should get the risk

free rate and then lenders just have to pay, you know,

the price. And right now the banks are saying like, hey,

we really want to compete and win that big, chunky

business from the barrower, so we're going to give him

lower rates, and we're going to just continue to try

to trick our depositors into not taking that much. So

it really comes down to like the big guy versus

the little guy in negotiating with the bank. And you know, look,

this needs to be taken away. It needs to be stopped.

It's it's ridiculous in my opinion, But that's what's happening today.

It's not so much that the banks are just pocketing

the money as it is you're being made forced to

subsidize some corporate loan that you don't even know exists.

Speaker 2: That's great insight. See, I think the majority of folks,

you know, from the outside look at it as the

bank's just trying to keep the majority of the funds.

But that's great insight out.

Speaker 1: And by the way, some bankers would argue, and they're

not entirely wrong that by having by forcing retail to

subsidize these loans. We're helping the economy be better, right,

So remember liquidity is what keeps the economy going. There

is some allegedly small business owner that took that loan

on the other side and he only had to pay

six percent instead of ten percent. Right, that's a big difference,

so he can now afford to borrow that and build

a business. So there's a fair argument that that we're

actually helping the economy with this. Now, I kind of

don't believe that. I think that really the guy who

should be paying that is most of that should be

coming out of compressed bank fees. The banks are more

profitable than they've ever been, and I do think they've

allowed to become very sloppy. I think as a retail person,

you deserve to get the risk free rate, whatever it is,

and banks, if they're doing their job right, should be

doing their damnedest to make sure that retail gets that number.

Then you know, on the other side, did they have

to pass that full cost through? Do they subsize it?

You know from the banking fees. You know, that's where

you could see more compression. I don't know what the

full spectrum of bank take rate on lending is, but

I think it's between six and eight percent of what

they're you know, kind of what they're trying to get

on their money. You know, maybe they need to squeeze

down by two and a half or three percent and

then yes, maybe lending rates need to increase a little

bit so that retail should they are the depositor, they're

the one source in the money, they should be getting

the risk free rate.

Speaker 2: There's been a lot of talks. We've been hearing certain

things coming out from big banks like Bank of America

City and SUP for that they want to launch their

own stable coins. But there's also talks of tokenized deposits.

So I'm curious, how.

Speaker 1: Do you think they do.

Speaker 2: You think they do both and it's used in different ways,

and you know, will the stable point market become too saturated.

Speaker 1: I'm not sure how token is deposits are going to

go exactly. So you know, the banks with deposits, they

have to know who all the clients are, right so

they can then give interest and you got to be tokenized.

But if it's just for your own clients, you know,

tokenizing it by itself may not have enough value because

you can already it's your deposits. You already have technology.

You know, banks have tons of technology. They can already

do a lot, So the tokenized deposit may not really

help that much. I guess it might work on closed

loop networks, so maybe permission ledgers and things like that,

it could work on a little bit better. But it's

it's a trickier thing, so we'll see how that goes.

I'm not sure exactly how it's gonna unfold.

Speaker 2: Get the bangs in fighting the stable coin yields situation.

They're obviously holding up the Clarity Act. I'm curious about

you know what your take is on that Clarity Act.

Do you think it's a good bill as it is?

And do you think it might pass this year?

Speaker 1: I guess I've actually stopped paying attention to a lot

of the details behind Clarity. I feel like whatever gets passed,

we will manage through it. There's better and there's worse,

and I suppose there's some things that are so bad

you shouldn't have anything. But actually, I do think Clarity

in almost any form adds one really important part, which

is it's the legislative path forward for digital assets. And

you know, we had a president before this one that

put a whole bunch of people in charge that we're

all just killing crypto and we can't have that again.

So getting Clarity passed in almost any form prevents that.

Now I realized there's some variance of clarity which could,

you know, block a lot of DeFi, which could of

course block a stable cooin interest, et cetera. I am

mostly hoping that those things don't happen. I think it's

hard to keep track of all of the various drafts

and versions and variants that are out there. So if

DeFi got killed, I think that would be kind of

where my line would be. And then almost anything else,

you know, losing the interest at least for now, we

could deal with that. Will come around on it, It'll

be fine. I think it's annoying. I think America has

a chance to do better on the on the the

the interest bearing stable coins one particular thing which I

think is kind of funny. The reason there's so many

stable coins getting issued is because if you can't give

interest to the depositor, well then everybody wants to have

their own stable coins. So think about it. The only

way to get the interest is to do the issuance.

So you're like, okay, well I don't want circle to

get it. I don't want to tether to get it

my user. I guess we'll create my own stable coin. Now,

imagine if you just had a stable coin which was

able to pass through most of it and ran like

an etf where you know, you keep fifty bases points

for administration and governance and stuff like that, and then

the rest passes through. Well, now the calculus on should

I run my own stable point completely changes Now. Instead

it's like, well, gee, I just pay that guy fifty

BIPs and then I get all the I get all

the interest on it, so I can go build my

applications and so things move a lot faster, they move

a lot better for everybody. So all right, if you

want to block interest, we'll do that for a little while.

There'll be this explosion of stable coins out there. They'll

be competition. We'll see who wins. I do think that

traditional finance you I like so far, and others will

come in and they will try to make make grounds

to win on the stable cooin space, and then eventually

we'll have interest on stable coins, and then at that

point it'll be like who does that the fastest and

the best, and then that that will be kind of

the dominant stablecoin ongoing we have that, then I think

it becomes a much less interesting game.

Speaker 2: I guess the silver lining of the situation, Mike, is

we saw just last week the SEC and the CFDC

are putting out guidance and rulemaking. They gave a breakdown

of crypto securities categories where majority are not securities, and

they highlighted a tokenize securities like stocks and so forth

continue to be security. So it's good that we have that,

But to your point, we still need the Clarity Act

to put this stamp and seal on it because another

administration can come in and roll things back.

Speaker 1: That's right. Yeah. Like Paul Atkins, I think has had

such a great attitude at the SEC. Every time I

talk to him, every time I see him talk, I'm

just delighted. So he wants to grow American capital markets.

And look, we've just been through the IPEO process of Bitco.

It's painful, it's costly. The reason we do it is

because we believe we actually get more business by being

a public company than not. It's a rare situation that's

be because Bicco happens to sit in a particular place

in the financial services industry. For most companies, No, you

don't make more business by just being public, right, Actually,

they're on the capital markets in order to be able

to raise money, raise capital. But they've made it so

difficult that well, maybe you should just stay private and

you should go to the private equity markets. You look,

there's a lot of money out there, and this has

worked very well. We have some very very large companies

that are still private as a results of it. Paul

Atkins wants to make it so like, look, let's bring

all these companies onto the public markets by making it easy,

and then we get better regulated markets, we get larger markets,

we bring more capital to the United States. It's just

it's all winning, and the previous administrations have seemed to

have lost that plot. It's not about like I like

this company or I like that company. Your regulator, you

have a job about making sure that people sit a

certain set of rules. That's it. You don't have to

like it. You don't have to like bitcoin, you know,

like bitco. Your job is to do regulations. So anyway,

I think we very much need clarity to make sure

that we can't have this again. I think most people

are worried. Some people are really paranoid worried, and sometimes

I hear those arguments about what would happen with if,

you know, when when we have a new president. I'm

not as paranoid. I'm more of an optimistic person, I think,

but I can't really dispel their fears either. It happened once,

so why wouldn't you believe it could happen again? Yeah?

Speaker 2: Absolutely, And sometimes it just takes something bad to happen

which has nothing to do necessarily with the technology, just

like a bad actor like a Sam bag mun freed

to change the narrative and in you know, they put

some new laws in place, and that hurts the adoption

of the technology.

Speaker 1: Yeah. I think SPF was a particularly special case. Look,

a lot of things were going fast. Part of why

we had to be public is because, you know, we

are a Silicon Valley company. You know, a people have

learned you can't trust Silicon Valley diligence, uh when it

comes to financial products. You know, obviously SBF had a

glowing review from Sequoia two hundred million dollars in this

massive you know puff piece about how awesome this guy

was and you didn't even have a CFO and you're

stealing money as fast as he could and Sequoia didn't

even know. So you have to be public, right, You

got to put a spotlight on all this stuff. You

got to go through the time, go through the diligence,

and then people can count on you.

Speaker 2: Mike, You've been here for a long time in this

market and a lot of folks, you know, are kind

of struggling with what happened in October of last year

with the market, you know, with bitcoin crashing down, and

it seems like the four year cycles still intact. But

it was the way it happened. There was no euphoria.

There was a blow off top, so to speak. You know,

what do you think happened? Was it kind of macro

conditions affected or stunted the bull market? And do you

think the four year cycle continues? Let's see for October

there was something that happened. You know, Finances has acknowledged

this and it did affect some parties. I don't know

if that was like the thing that's really going on

at the macro level right now. I think we have

two conflating things that are happening, which makes it just

really hard to tell because one is going up and

the other one's going down. So, first off, you know,

the world chaos continues to play out the Bitcoin narrative

that you need to get off of fiat rails, and

the fiat rails are going to continue to just be

inflated and inflated, inflated.

Speaker 1: And you will lose all your money. You throw in

wars and instability in certain local regions, that becomes even

more important. So this is all, you know, Bitcoin's thesis,

and you know Tether, I think you know you look around.

I've started to hear it's not the taxi driver, but

from various business sides where you're just like that guy's

heard of tether, wow, And you know for international money movements,

tether is awesome. So those those those components are all

bullish for bitcoin digital assets. Then the negative part. I

do think bitcoin is the most liquid asset in the world.

You can trade it twenty four to seven. It does

have a higher volatility, which means it's a risk asset,

which means that as soon as you start retreating to

your corners because you're worried about what's going on in

the markets. It's the first thing you saw. It just

is now you might be buying it back, you know,

a little bit later, but it's the thing that you

have access to the most. So these two things are

going against each other and it's really making it hard

to read. I do think there's a number of parties

that a lot of money early on in bitcoin that

have been moving to the sidelines and saying, you know

what I'm gonna I'm gonna cash out some of this

and kind of go into different things. So that's happening

as well. Look, all these happened at the same time,

so the patterns sometimes are hard hard to see. But

the two main ones I think is like, yes, the

thesis is continuing to prove itself and you know, bitcoin

will continue to go up. The second one is fear

and what's liquid causes people to sell, and it's making

it really hard to read. I guess maybe another thing

is that people are uncertain about you know, you see

things like micro strategy strategy. Now they's got a big

pile of bitcoin and we haven't seen this before. And

the other thing is, you know, I think Sailor deserves

a ton of credit here you know, he's figured out

how to use the public equity markets in a way

that the traditional bankers didn't do. And remember when companies

get big, they do get a little less innov it

if they just kind of cling to the thing that

they did in the past that work. And by the way,

make no mistake, I mean investment banking is the most

profitable vision of these large investments, these large banks, So

they're very, very good at what they do. They don't

want that to change. And Sailor is coming up with

new pioneering models for how you can use that thing

that nobody's ever thought of before. The bankers certainly don't.

They're not they're not innovators like like Sailors. So that

that does leave a little bit of question where people

are just like, how's this going to work? And I

think what has to happen is I just have to

settle out a little bit longer. People have to get

more educated about how it works, and we'll see. Look,

everything's got risk on it, even what Michael's doing. I

think these I think he understands the risks that he's

taking and and he's probably gonna work. But it does

create some amount of skepticism. That skepticism will come and

go in waves. That's not specifical. Some bitcoin cycles, that's

just like market cycles go up and down like this.

Speaker 2: Yeah, well said, And it feels like we're near a

bottom mic knock on wood. I don't know, you know

what's going to happen if we're going to go in anottle

lead down to the fifty k's or so, but it

feels like the majority of the downside has happened, right

if you look at the percentage wise, we may be

the thesis of we didn't have a massive parabolic run up,

so maybe we're not going to have.

Speaker 1: The same type of downside we've seen in previous bull

markets or bear markets. Yeah. I mean one thing I

forgot to mention in terms of proving the bitcoin thesis.

You know, we saw gold this year perform tremendously well.

And what that is is, look, gold at some level

has the same thesis as Bitcoin, which is that the

Fiat side is going to continue to go down and

so get into gold. And what happened was that particular

fear grew. You know, you can hear Gray Dalio talking

all the time about the cycles that we're in at

the macromacro level, and people are like, yeah, they agree

with that, but they may not understand bitcoin. And if

you're an investor, you should not invest in things you

don't understand, right, No discredit to bitcoin here, just this

is this is this is anybody smart, you should not

invest this stuff you don't understand. But gold they do understand,

and so they buy go. So so that again for

the for the for proves that that that side and

then I guess the last track of your last question.

Speaker 2: You know, I mean it just seemed like, uh, maybe

the downside won't be as bad down. Yeah, here's what

I think. I think I can guarantee this part. Uh,

dollar will go down more in the next ten years

than bitcoin will. So I think we're looking at another

you know, dollars could be thirty percent down over the

next ten years, maybe forty percent.

Speaker 1: It's just tremendous. So you know, the one hundred dollars

bill that you have in your wallet right now in

ten years is only worth fifty bucks. I mean, it's crazy.

And uh, and bitcoins socketing go down that much, so

you sed buy bitcoin? Yeah, I definitely agree. There. Final

item before I let you go what's on your roadmap? Well,

I can't talk about the roadmap anymore. This is the

funny thing create a company like gosh, you know I

had to I had to get so many you know,

counsel and advice from lawyers. Oh you can't talk about

material now look at it. I'm like, okay, well can

I can I go on a podcast with this this

tony guy. He's been been talking to him every every

year for for like five years now, and like no, no, no, no, okay, yes,

yeah we can. We can talk about general stuff. We

can talk about stuff we've been ounced, but we can't

talk about what's what's coming. But look, the company continues

to do what it's always done, which is which is infrastructure.

I think, you know, check and and and look around.

I think a lot of people are talking about infrastructure.

I guess I'll go back to one thing that's kind

of unique about Bicco. We started, you know, pushing this

two out of three multi sig wallet way way back,

and nowadays everybody uses you know, some amount of multi

so it could be MPC can be multi sig, but

of course it just it eliminates single point failure and

who gravitated towards that all the way from the beginning, well,

it was people that had lots of bitcoin than it

was businesses and institutions. So we've always been this institutional player.

And in twenty thirteen, twenty fourteen, twenty fifteen, everybody else

was talking about retail, retail, retail, and we were doing

kind of to start institutional infrastructure pieces. And of course

they all want to use it via API. So you know,

whether you're a broker dealer, whether you're a payment process

or whether you're exchange, all those guys that started using bicco,

we're helping us refine the product, make it stronger, make

it better for what institutions need in order to put

this infrastructure into their own products. And then today, of

course it's it's far more. We've got more coin support

than anybody else or the fireblocks, more on the coinbase,

more than Anchorage buy a Maya by the way, it's

not even close. And that's just at the technology layer,

and everything we do is two out of three, which

takes against both theft and loss, and so we've really,

I think honed this very well. And eventually other companies

came in, you know, those are the companies I mentioned

on the institutional side, they didn't start on the institutional

side until I don't know, twenty seventeen, twenty eighteen didn't

even exist, right, So nowadays it's sexy, but we've been

doing it from the beginning. I think that puts it

more in our DNA, and it's certainly been helping us lately.

So we'll continue to do that, continue to grow what works,

and hopefully continue to build great solutions.

Speaker 2: Well, Mike, I know I'm going to see great updates.

You guys are always ahead of the curve and building

really cool things. So and the next one we're gonna

have to do it in person in New York and

talk about the latest and greatest.

Speaker 1: But thank you so much for it's good earnings later

this week. So yeah, then then you get the answer

to the question gives you.

Speaker 2: Just there awesome, Thank you, Mike, all right, take care,

Thank you so much for tuning in. Please hit the

like button subscribe if you haven't as yet. If you're

listening on a podcast platform such a Spotify or Apple,

please follow and leave a five star rating.

Speaker 1: Thank you so much.

This transcript was automatically generated by the podcast creator and may contain errors. Aggregated via the PodcastIndex API.