Civics In A Year
What do you really know about American government, the Constitution, and your rights as a citizen?Civics in a Year is a fast-paced podcast series that delivers essential civic knowledge in just 10 minutes per episode. Over the course of a year, we’ll explore 250 key questions—from the founding documents and branches of government to civil liberties, elections, and public participation.Rooted in the Civic Literacy Curriculum from the Center for American Civics at Arizona State University, this series is a collaborative project supported by the School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership. Each episode is designed to spark curi...
Latest Episodes
A sitting vice president shoots a Founding Father, the Constitution gets rewritten because of a botched election, and a rivalry that starts as professional respect ends in blood. That’s the real historical arc behind Hamilton and Burr, and it’s even more complicated than the musical makes it look.
We’re joined by Dr. Stephen Knott, historian and author who studied Hamilton long before pop culture made him a household name. Together, we map the early connection between Alexander Hamilton and Aaron Burr as Revolutionary War veterans and New York City lawyers, then follow the moments where politics turns personal. The Senate race that stings, the grudges that harden, and the campaign tactics that push both men toward a public breaking point all matter because early American politics runs on reputation as much as policy.
From there, we dig into the election of 1800, the Electoral College tie, and the House vote that triggers the 12th Amendment. We talk about why Hamilton urges support for Jefferson over Burr, what that says about party politics and principle, and how “all ambition, no principle” becomes a lens for understanding Burr’s choices. Finally, we unpack the duel itself, what dueling rules often aimed for, why Burr’s shot changes everything, and what happens next: indictment, a troubled journey west, and a treason trial that ends in acquittal but not redemption.
If you care about US history, constitutional amendments, the Electoral College, or the true story behind Hamilton vs Burr, this conversation connects the dots. Subscribe, share this with a history-minded friend, and leave a review with your take on Burr: calculating villain or complicated product of his era?
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
Your city is not just where you live. It is a political education you walk through every day.
We sit down with Dr. John Harner, professor of geography and environmental studies, to connect cultural geography to civic engagement in the United States. We unpack what “place” really means, including place identity (the image a community projects through architecture, branding, and design rules) and sense of place (the personal ties that make us feel rooted). When those pieces work together, people feel valued, connected, and more willing to show up for local politics, volunteer work, and community problem-solving.
Then we follow the thread into the built environment: public spaces that welcome everyone versus landscapes that exclude. We talk about placelessness, the spread of disposable, look-alike development, and how car-centered suburban design can weaken a sense of belonging. From there, we explore how politics can shape place through regulation, sprawl, and privatized enclaves, and how those landscapes can reinforce ideas about property, public services, and community responsibility.
We also zoom out to economic and social forces, linking spatial mobility to social mobility through housing choice, transportation access, and opportunity. Finally, we turn to border regions and the US-Mexico border as dynamic spaces where identity, citizenship, and political boundaries are constantly negotiated, and where proximity can foster empathy and compromise.
If you want smarter conversations about urban planning, civic life, and how place shapes political identity, listen now, then subscribe, share this episode with a friend, and leave a review. What place has shaped your worldview the most?
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
A map can look clean and still be unfair, and a “weird” map can exist for reasons most people never learn. That’s why we sit down with Dr. Rebecca Theobald, an associate research professor at the University of Colorado Colorado Springs, to unpack geocivics and the real mechanics behind redistricting and gerrymandering. We walk through what geocivics looks like in practice: learning the US Census and apportionment, understanding state rules, debating criteria, and then using free online mapping tools to draw and defend your own legislative district map.
We also tackle one of the most common misunderstandings in civics: districts represent people, not land. That’s how you can end up with a massive rural congressional district next to tiny urban districts without anyone getting “extra” representation. From there, we get concrete about the principles map drawers juggle, including equal population, contiguity, compactness, protecting minority voters, keeping counties and cities intact, and recognizing communities of interest. We talk about why independent redistricting commissions matter, what “fair representation” can mean in different communities, and how court decisions shape what challenges are possible.
Then we zoom out to the stakes: the decennial census, the fixed 435 House seats, shifting electoral votes, and how undercounts can change representation for a decade. If you teach civics, history, or geography, we also point to practical resources including the GeoCivics project and Dave’s Redistricting App so students can compare maps built for different goals and see the tradeoffs for themselves.
If this helped you see district lines differently, subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review so more people can learn how maps shape democracy.
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
A president’s first job after a national trauma is to lead the story people tell themselves about what just happened and what must happen next. After 9/11, George W. Bush had to name the enemy, promise action, and still convince Americans that daily life could continue without surrendering to fear. We talk with historian Dr. Stephen Knott about how Bush framed the attacks in his address to the nation, why that framing shaped public understanding of the conflict that followed, and how presidential rhetoric can steady a country even when the future feels unknowable.
From the bullhorn moment at Ground Zero to the World Series first pitch in an FDNY jacket, we dig into presidential communication as more than optics. These public signals helped project resolve and restore a sense of normalcy, but they also set expectations for what “justice” would look like. We explore why certain lines and images endure, and how leadership in a crisis often hinges on a few clear, memorable choices.
Then we follow the power. The 2001 Authorization for Use of Military Force (AUMF) and the USA PATRIOT Act dramatically expanded executive branch authority in the name of national security. We unpack how Congress delegated its constitutional war powers, why that deference is common in emergencies, and what the long-term constitutional implications look like when broad authorizations turn into long-running military engagements. We also hear about Knott’s new book, Conspirator in Chief, and what presidential rumor-mongering can cost the body politic.
Listen, share with a friend who cares about civics, and leave a review: Should Congress put real limits and sunsets on AUMFs?
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
Memorial Day gets marketed like a party, but the real story is heavier and more human. We’re joined by Allison Finkelstein, Senior Historian at Arlington National Cemetery, to trace Memorial Day back to its first name: Decoration Day. From Arlington’s creation during the Civil War to the first official annual observance of National Decoration Day in 1868, we talk about how public rituals, flowers, and community grief shaped the way the United States remembers its war dead.
Then we slow down and look at remembrance, one name at a time. Allison shares the story of Private Sylvester Ducket of the 369th Infantry, the Harlem Hellfighters, and how a headstone can open a door into archives, family choices, and long-delayed recognition. We also discuss Anita Campos, a Spanish-American War nurse contracted before the Army Nurse Corps existed, and what her burial at Arlington says about the service that the government didn’t always fully name or reward. Along the way, we unpack Arlington’s history of segregation by race and rank and why the cemetery’s landscape still helps us see that past.
We also get practical about what Memorial Day can look like now: Arlington’s Flags In tradition, the Tomb of the Unknown Soldier, and Flowers of Remembrance, which invites the public to place a flower in a powerful act of collective memory. If you teach civics or history, Alison explains free educational resources from Arlington National Cemetery, including lesson plans, primary source activities, and upcoming virtual visits that bring the site to your classroom.
Subscribe for more conversations that make civics feel real, share this with a teacher or veteran in your life, and leave a review so more listeners can find us. What’s one way you plan to observe Memorial Day with intention this year?
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
Power rarely looks like a speech. Sometimes it looks like a phone call, a vote count, and a president who knows exactly how the Senate works. We’re joined by LBJ Foundation Chairman and CEO Mark Updgrove for a clear-eyed conversation about Lyndon B. Johnson, the skills that made him so effective, and why his story still belongs in every serious discussion of American civic education.
We dig into the Johnson Treatment, LBJ’s legendary ability to persuade, and how his command of the legislative process turned relationships into results. From the pivotal 1964 election to the fleeting nature of political capital, we track how Johnson used a historic mandate to push a progressive agenda at breathtaking speed. The Great Society comes into focus not as a slogan, but as the foundation of modern America: Medicare, Medicaid, the Voting Rights Act, major education funding, immigration reform, environmental protections, and more.
Then we confront the shadow that shaped how many Americans remember him: the Vietnam War, the draft, and a country pulling apart. Mark also explains why Johnson’s 1968 decision not to run again still matters, including the personal reality of his health. We close with a defense of presidential libraries as repositories of the public record and as public squares for debate, plus a listener-friendly path into the LBJ telephone tapes that let you hear history unfold in real time.
Subscribe for more deep dives on U.S. history and civic learning, share this with a friend who loves presidential history, and leave us a review with your biggest takeaway.
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
A dog on the White House lawn can do what a policy speech can’t: make power feel personal. We’re taking a sharp, surprisingly civic look at presidential pets and why these “small” stories shape how Americans see leadership, character, and credibility. From carefully curated photo ops to messy headlines that remind us the White House is also a home, pets have become part of modern political communication.
We walk through some of the most telling examples in presidential history, starting with Franklin D Roosevelt’s Scottish terrier, Fala, and the famous moment Roosevelt used humor about his dog to reinforce confidence during wartime. Then we move to one of the most politically important pet stories ever told on television: Richard Nixon’s 1952 Checkers speech, where a family dog becomes the emotional centerpiece of a career-saving argument. Along the way, we connect the dots to the rise of the “public presidency” and how media rewards relatability.
We also explore how the pet narrative evolves through the TV era and into the 21st century with Reagan’s ranch image, George H W Bush’s wildly popular dog Millie, Barack Obama’s promise of Bo, and the constant attention around President Biden’s dogs. And yes, we make room for the weird ones too: John Quincy Adams’ alligator and Calvin Coolidge’s raccoon Rebecca. If you care about civics, presidential history, media influence, and how voters form trust, this is a surprisingly revealing place to look.
Subscribe, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review with your favorite presidential pet story.
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
I can still picture the classroom TV, the countdown, and the way excitement turned into silence 73 seconds after liftoff. The Space Shuttle Challenger disaster wasn’t just a news event for a lot of Americans, it was something we witnessed as kids, especially because a teacher was onboard. When that kind of shock hits a country in real time, the next question becomes painfully simple: what do you say now?
That night, President Ronald Reagan made a choice that still matters in civics, leadership, and crisis communication. He set aside the State of the Union and delivered a brief national address that spoke directly to schoolchildren. I walk through what made the Reagan Challenger speech work: clear acknowledgment of grief, restraint on technical details, and a focus on shared meaning instead of easy answers. We also unpack the lines that shaped public memory, including “The future doesn’t belong to the faint-hearted. It belongs to the brave,” and why naming the astronauts shifted the moment from history to human beings.
We end with the question Reagan put at the center of the nation’s recovery: do we keep exploring after loss? If you care about public rhetoric, presidential speechwriting, NASA history, or how leaders speak during national tragedy, this is a tight, unforgettable example. Subscribe for more from Civics in a Year, share this with someone who remembers that day, and leave a review with the line from the speech that stayed with you most.
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
The I Have a Dream speech is one of the most recognizable moments in American history, but the version most of us carry around is often the shortest and safest one. We sit down with returning guest Dr. Michael Butler to rebuild the speech from the ground up: the Birmingham campaign, the political pressure on President John F. Kennedy, and the urgency created by Medgar Evers’ assassination in Jackson, Mississippi. When you place August 28, 1963 back into its real world, the “dream” lands differently.
We also dig into the March on Washington for Jobs and Freedom as a feat of coalition-building, not a foregone conclusion. Dr. Butler spotlights Bayard Rustin’s central role, the risks organizers faced, and the way the march was meant to prove broad interracial and interfaith support for a federal Civil Rights Act. Then we talk about what it was like to hear King live at the Lincoln Memorial, including the Black church tradition behind his cadence and the way he weaves the Constitution, the Declaration of Independence, the Gettysburg Address, and Scripture into a single moral argument.
Most importantly, we don’t skip the reality check that comes before the famous lines. King names police brutality, voter suppression, poverty, and the “bad check” America hands to Black citizens, and he says “justice” long before he says “dream.” We unpack how that fuller meaning gets lost, how King was controversial in his own time, and why the FBI treated him as dangerous enough to intensify surveillance through COINTELPRO. If you care about civic education, teaching US history honestly, or understanding the civil rights movement beyond sound bites, this conversation is for you.
Subscribe for more history that keeps its context, share the episode with a friend, and leave a review. What line from King’s speech do you think Americans most need to hear in full today?
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership
A campaign firestorm pushed Barack Obama to a crossroads in 2008: offer a quick political defense or step into the country’s oldest argument about who “We the People” really are. We choose the second path and unpack “A More Perfect Union,” his Philadelphia speech that threads together constitutional language, American history, and the unresolved realities of race and citizenship. If you care about civic education, U.S. politics, or why national unity keeps feeling out of reach, this conversation gives you a clear framework for thinking instead of another round of slogans.
We start with the setting and the stakes. Speaking at the National Constitution Center, Obama anchors his case in the Preamble’s promise to “form a more perfect union,” arguing the Constitution was built to be improved rather than treated as finished and flawless. That idea opens the door to the hardest part of the speech: naming slavery as an original sin and describing American history as a repeated effort to close the gap between ideals and reality.
From there, we break down how Obama confronts the Jeremiah Wright controversy, condemns offensive remarks, and still refuses to reduce a person or a community to a single moment. We explore his willingness to hold competing truths at once: anger in the Black community, resentment among working- and middle-class White Americans, and the danger of pretending any of it can be wished away. Finally, we follow the speech’s turn from reflection to action, where unity becomes a practical requirement for tackling crumbling schools, unequal opportunity, and economic policies that reward the few.
If this helped you think more clearly about polarization, progress, and the work of democracy, subscribe, share the episode, and leave a review. What line from the speech still feels most relevant today?
Check Out the Civic Literacy Curriculum!
School of Civic and Economic Thought and Leadership